Introduction
Food waste is one of the most unpredictable issues in the HORECA industry, and it cannot be resolved due to numerous factors that affect the use of food. For instance, the lack of predictive capability and organizational flexibility tends to lead to even more issues in the restaurant business. With an average of 25 billion pounds of food wasted across the United States each year, it is vital to address this issue as soon as possible (Huang et al., 2022).
With restaurants wasting approximately 10% of all food generated across the country, the issue cannot be ignored any longer. Both environmental and economic damage can be expected to transpire when over-the-top food waste trends are in place. For instance, Gruia et al. (2021) noted that more than 50,000 pounds of food are wasted annually without entering the recycling stream. Hence, food waste continues to increase, resulting in substantial energy costs and increased greenhouse gas emissions.
The socioeconomic and environmental consequences of food waste across the HORECA industry cannot be neglected. Discarding food produces methane and intensifies the generation of greenhouse gases, contributing to climate change (Vizzotto et al., 2020). Another problem that researchers must address is that HORECA organizations utilize land, energy, and water resources, only to have a high percentage of food discarded at the end of the day. Therefore, socioeconomic factors are particularly significant in food waste, as both consumers and businesses tend to prioritize saving money and resources over long-term environmental consequences. The goal for all stakeholders should be to work together to establish an equitable, sustainable environment where food waste is proactively prevented. The thesis investigated in this paper is that existing food waste trends can be mitigated through a comprehensive strategy that includes improved waste management, consumer-centered incentives, and a revised organizational culture.
Environmental Science
When discussing the connection between food waste and environmental science, two particular gaps need to be addressed. The first one is the lack of insight into non-traditional metrics, such as water and land use, biodiversity loss, and soil degradation. Food waste has a significant negative impact on the environment, so the whole picture cannot be fully understood using only traditional metrics. From water resource conservation and enhanced water management to crop rotation and detailed agroforestry, there are numerous ways for interdisciplinary teams to minimize food waste to a reasonable extent (Filimonau et al., 2019).
Traditional environmental metrics are no longer a viable option for measuring food waste across the HORECA industry. Hence, water usage and greenhouse gas emissions are no longer considered the most effective. Instead, it is recommended to examine the benefits of food donations and their subsequent social impact (Huang et al., 2022). It could be one of the best ways to address food poverty and insecurity while giving back to the community.
At the same time, employee morale and job satisfaction in the HORECA industry could serve as another means of measuring food waste through non-traditional metrics. Employee engagement is vital because it enhances job motivation and fosters a more profound sense of purpose. According to Filimonau et al. (2023), it could lead to improved customer loyalty and a stronger brand reputation. By becoming more sustainable, organizations in the HORECA industry can prioritize food waste and explore how to prevent it using non-traditional metrics.
Hence, the second gap is the lack of detailed comparisons among waste management strategies, such as composting, recycling, and landfilling. Additional data collection and analysis can facilitate the process; however, the primary finding is that composting is the most sustainable and effective method for reducing environmental pollution (Lang et al., 2020). Landfills, in turn, are the least effective because they generate methane, which accelerates climate change. More HORECA organizations should focus on compost-based strategies because they enable a shift away from synthetic fertilizers and reduce various emissions.
Additionally, the HORECA industry creates an environment where excessive food waste is the norm. For example, consumers are currently accustomed to ordering larger portions that they often do not fully consume (Lang et al., 2020). It means that food waste occurs daily because there are no tangible limitations to how much a person can order versus how much they actually eat.
A more significant issue with food waste is that numerous HORECA organizations often discard food that does not appear marketable, even though it is still safe to eat. Visual appeal is significant to consumers, but it should not be treated as the primary priority by food-producing entities (Martin-Rios et al., 2020). Resource preservation and reducing the effects of climate change can be seen as two long-term objectives that HORECA representatives must achieve.
Behavioral Economics
When examining the connections between behavioral economics and food waste, it is crucial to acknowledge the limited understanding of psychological factors that contribute to food waste in restaurants, including consumer attitudes and beliefs, decision-making processes, and social norms. Hence, the primary issue with this gap is that many consumers believe larger portions offer greater value and help them save money (Vizzoto et al., 2020). As a result, many people order more than they can eat, leading to food waste. As for social norms, some individuals are influenced by others to order more food. This implicit peer pressure makes it harder for restaurants to prevent food waste because individual psychological factors are at fault.
The second gap to review is the lack of discussion of behavioral interventions, such as nudges or incentives, for consumers who waste food intentionally or unintentionally. For example, restaurants could use smaller plates to reduce portion sizes and motivate consumers to eat less (Filimonau et al., 2023). Another crucial strategy would be to have customers bring their own containers and pack the leftovers instead of leaving food on the plate.
There is also evidence suggesting that consumers tend to evaluate food primarily through the lens of aesthetics rather than taste. Gruia et al. (2021) suggest that perfectly edible food may be rejected by customers due to its less visually appealing appearance. Another problem often faced by HORECA representatives is that consumers are largely unaware of the economic and environmental impacts of food waste. Filimonau et al. (2019) noted that wasteful behaviors stem from apathy towards eco-friendly solutions and a lack of knowledge about general food waste. Steps must be taken to educate individuals and ensure that consumers become more knowledgeable about expiration dates, portion sizes, and menu items.
Management Science
Ultimately, management science can be linked to food waste through the interface of an underestimated role of technology in reducing it, such as food tracking and inventory management systems. The latter can establish an environment in which over-ordering can be prevented, and all menus can be planned (Huang et al., 2022). The inherent value of inventory management systems lies in the opportunity to track food that is frequently wasted and avoid excessive littering in the future.
Another vital gap to address when discussing management science within the framework of the food waste problem is the lack of a detailed discussion of organizational culture and leadership. For example, the former can motivate employees to adhere to waste reduction policies, and the latter can be utilized to promote different positive attitudes among the workforce (Martin-Rios et al., 2020). With new incentives in place, more workers will be motivated to innovate and experiment with waste reduction.
The biggest problem with food waste is that HORECA organizations often encourage employees to sell more food than customers can consume, resulting in excess food production. The focus shifts from waste minimization to revenue maximization, creating an improper source of motivation for food producers (Vizzoto et al., 2020).
Another specific problem that cannot be overlooked is overstocking and overpreparation of food items. Many employees can be moved by the idea that they have to prepare enough meals to meet sales targets. This strategy is somewhat likely to result in food waste because managers order more food than necessary (Filimonau et al., 2019). These issues must be addressed through detailed workplace incentives that are based on sustainability and environmental benefits.
Conclusion
With food poverty and insecurity at stake, food waste can leave specific populations without sufficient nourishment. Based on existing findings, donating excess food and implementing enhanced inventory management could be key measures to improve the current situation. At the same time, HORECA organizations could offer smaller food portions to consumers and donate excess food to reduce food waste while encouraging positive behaviors. Furthermore, incentivizing training and waste reduction can elevate the HORECA industry and generate profits without requiring organizations to prioritize output over rational resource use. Overall, there are numerous ways to close the gap and develop a comprehensive strategy to reduce food waste across the HORECA industry.
Reflection
I am confident in my arguments because they provide a detailed account of the current food waste situation. All the sources included in the paper are scholarly and peer-reviewed, so I believe I have provided sufficient robust evidence to support all the claims. One way to strengthen existing arguments would be to focus more on the sustainability of the HORECA industry. Additional evidence would be required to assess the prevalence of sustainable practices and determine how the negative impact of food waste can be mitigated on a long-term scale.
I should also consider the roles of technology and leadership in greater detail. The paper provides a comprehensive review of related evidence, but it lacks depth in how HORECA organizations achieve their objectives using both material and non-material tools. One question that still puzzles me about the food waste issue is whether consumer-centered incentives could lead to changes in social norms and decision-making processes.
References
Filimonau, V., Chiang, C. C., Wang, L. E., Muhialdin, B. J., & Ermolaev, V. A. (2023). Resourcefulness of chefs and food waste prevention in fine dining restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108, 103368.
Filimonau, V., Fidan, H., Alexieva, I., Dragoev, S., & Marinova, D. D. (2019). Restaurant food waste and the determinants of its effective management in Bulgaria: An exploratory case study of restaurants in Plovdiv. Tourism Management Perspectives, 32, 100577.
Gruia, R., Florescu, G. I., Gaceu, L., Oprea, O. B., & Ţane, N. (2021). Reducing environmental risk by applying a polyvalent model of waste management in the restaurant industry. Sustainability, 13(11), 5852.
Huang, Y., Ma, E., & Yen, T. H. (2022). Generation Z diners’ moral judgements of restaurant food waste in the United States: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1-20.
Lang, L., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, N., Xue, B., & Han, W. (2020). Awareness of food waste recycling in restaurants: Evidence from China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104949.
Martin-Rios, C., Hofmann, A., & Mackenzie, N. (2020). Sustainability-oriented innovations in food waste management technology. Sustainability, 13(1), 210.
Vizzoto, F., Tessitore, S., Iraldo, F., & Testa, F. (2020). Passively concerned: HORECA managers’ recognition of the importance of food waste hardly leads to the adoption of more strategies to reduce it. Waste Management, 107, 266-275.