Introduction
Determining the reliability of the study and the credibility of its conclusions should be based on the analysis of applicability and the importance of the study. It is also necessary to consider the sampling method and its relevance to the study’s objectives, while understanding the data analysis process (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).
Validity and Credibility of the Study and Its Results
A qualitative study by Karreinen et al. (2023), which deals with leadership and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, was selected for analysis. The study can be considered reliable because it meets all the criteria for validity and provides valuable insights for future practice. The results of the study in question are valid, trustworthy, and credible. Karreinen et al. (2023) conclude that the acceptance of uncertainty is the basis for the functioning of primary health care, and the means of increasing adaptability were workforce, knowledge, understanding, and cooperation.
The study findings can be trusted because they are based on individual interviews and represent first-hand best practices (Karreinen et al., 2023). Research establishes practical implications in defining the role of leaders and delineating aspects of sustainability. These findings can be applied to health care as well as other areas of leadership.
Research Significance
The significance of the study is clear; it lies in practical recommendations for action in times of crisis, obtained from best practices. The sample consisted of 14 leaders of local healthcare systems in four regions (Karreinen et al., 2023).
Sampling and Data Collection Accuracy
The sampling strategy is clear and was dictated by the needs of the study: local leaders were selected to determine strategies for dealing with the crisis. Data for the study were obtained from 14 semi-structured interviews after detailed analysis (Karreinen et al., 2023). The data collection procedure is also straightforward, and it is clear that only the priority opinions of healthcare representatives were included in the analysis.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the analyzed article meets all the reliability criteria. The findings are based on interviews with local health officials. The procedure for sampling and data selection is established in the study, and there is no doubt about its accuracy. The study’s applicability to healthcare and other areas of leadership is documented. The study’s practical significance lies in the awareness of the need to accept uncertainty and increase adaptability in times of crisis.
References
Karreinen, S., Paananen, H., Kihlström, L., Janhonen, K., Huhtakangas, M., Viita-Aho, M., & Tynkkynen, L. K. (2023). Living through uncertainty: A qualitative study on leadership and resilience in primary healthcare during COVID-19. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 1-13.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Wolters Kluwer.