In ancient times, the reigning jurists and philosophers proposed natural laws, which later became paramount in deciding human behavior and conduct. These laws existed naturally. In fact, thoughts from our founding fathers are the fundamental basics of natural laws that exhibit in today’s life disciplines. The term ‘natural law ‘started in the Romans. Later on, theologians and jurists found the term applicable in theological and human psychological concepts and started using it heavily. These jurists and theologians considered natural laws to be the pinnacle representing a myriad of other jurisprudence laws, governing human conduct. Since then, a century over a century, people considered natural laws paramount in their world understanding. Of importance to note is that the laws remain as dense and unassailable as ever. Some theologians, professors, students and jurists believe that these laws are divine providence whereby, minus them, life contradicts.
Therefore, a natural law school creates human behavior and conduct. Important to note is that this natural school of law forms the fundamental social norms and human behavior paramount in all genres of life. A natural law school is a superhighway through which people attain social values, expectations and goals. Both corporate, legal, science and business laws compose natural laws learned in the natural law school. For example, Newton’s law of motion applies in diverse technological advancements while, in business and economics, businesspersons find the law of supply and demand functional in transactions. The natural law school challenges human understanding and leaves the mind with a choice of accepting natural laws or denying them. Nevertheless, denying natural law amounts to jurisprudence failure. (Chloros, 1958, pp. 609-612).
In the natural law school, natural laws depict nature to exist everywhere. Unlike positive laws, it is hard to criticize or mutilate natural laws. Although natural law school marks beneficial human behavior, no one can establish its foundation. In natural law school, the metaphysical substructure induces governing ideas, an ability to interpret certain laws and how to apply natural laws. Some scholars argue that natural law schools form true jurisprudence where observation influences the generation of facts. Moreover, the natural law school is the only avenue through which different institutions cohabit. When different human institutions rely on each other, there forms a guiding principle paramount to social stability. Consequently, jurisprudence becomes a social science, which serves as a preamble in the study of positive and natural laws. In other words, the natural slaw school behaves as a finale, summarizing large volumes of work done in the past. (Murphy, 2009, pp. 12-58).
The natural law school provides jurisprudence that takes the place of natural laws. This is because; natural laws ought to exercise practicality hence, scientific and practical advancements. From it, the philosophical foundation and the fundamental basis of laws emanate. For a long time, philosophers have found objects and foundations invariable and absolute. Nonetheless, natural law school knowledge on sound social and political norms, which are integral to society. It guarantees liberty and equality before law hand in hand with social camaraderie and goodwill among human beings. For that reason, natural law schools act as an arbitrator, changing social conditions and current law practices from good to excellent. (Murphy, 2009, pp. 112-123).
Natural law school furnishes true and great ideals that shed light on law. For example, natural law school provides an insight into philosophical and metaphysical concepts of law. The new concepts guide people towards universal leadership models acceptable by all institutions. The new concepts pave way for justice to thrive especially in societies fragmented by impunity and favoritism. On the other hand, having realized the new philosophical and metaphysical concepts, people can make informed institutional reforms through sound legislation. Indeed, unlike the old science, natural law schools disseminate relative and material norms depending on people’s practices, place and time. Additionally, the natural law school bestows international legal prominence with an aim of the uniform codification of laws. Overall, there is a great prospect that any amendment of international and civil law is possible courtesy of natural law school to create an outstanding socio-political environment dominated by economic development. (Stasosphere, 2009, Para. 1-8).
Natural law school enlightens on how to make widely accepted legislation. For example, any legislator must follow natural laws before enacting a bill to become law. In this case, an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the legislation is necessary in order not to tamper with the social orders. Unlike ancient jurisprudence, modem jurisprudence earned through natural law school is violence-free hence, revolutionary. Additionally, natural law school provides fundamental basics of making judge-made laws so that, institutions tandem with social norms. For example, the natural law school educates human dignities and abscond issues that deprive human decorum like euthanasia, persecution, rape, child abuse, abortion and crime. (Stasosphere, 2009, Para. 11-17).
In conclusion, natural law school forms an excellent juridical criterion characterized by metaphysical quality and represent current social scenario. Its precepts bind people with true developmental sociology applicable in all institutions of life. From science to business to legal matters, natural law school is integral in creating new social orders. Today, jurisprudence remains an empirical tool, which measures metaphysical speculation in human behavior.
Reference List
Chloros, G. (1958). What Is Natural Law? The Modern Law Review, 21(6), 609-622.
Murphy, M. (2009). Natural law in jurisprudence and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stasosphere. (2009). True Basics and Object of Jurisprudence. Web.