Response to intervention technique is a multi-tiered practice to identify and address students’ academic and behavioral needs. Administrators and teachers can use tactics to help children have discipline, reasonable behavior objectives, and standards for staff to follow when engaging with students. Interventions are tailored to the student’s specific needs and can be tracked to measure performance and offer data for appropriate adjustments to current and future interventions. Response to interventions (RTI) provides direct ways to enhance student conduct and is tiered to guarantee that each kid receives what they require (Shepherd & Linn, 2015). The types of strategies include; tier 1 (the entire class interventions), tier 2 (small grouping interventions), and tier 3 (intense interventions).
The tier 1 intervention strategy is the most basic, and it supports around 80% of kids’ behavior. To enhance appropriate student behavior, each instructor or administrator will be authorized to employ a variety of incentives or behavior-monitoring reinforcements. The distinct rules and requirements are to utilize a device that specifies the expectations and any advantages the learner can earn if they satisfy those requirements (Shepherd & Linn, 2015). Teachers can provide precise directions, state what appropriate behavior looks like, and then acknowledge a student performing appropriately through verbal encouragement.
After completion of the student assessments, the instructor should be able to determine which kids require additional behavior support. Tier 2 intervention strategy is necessary for around 15% of students who need more individualized assistance. This could include self-monitoring materials or systems that enable students’ structures to control their behavioral traits and give them agency to change their conduct by excusing themselves or interacting with a staff person. Students can keep track of their behavior from one lesson to the next using folders (Shepherd & Linn, 2015). Instructors can approve the behavior charts and then openly discuss it with the student’s parents or custodians to offer encouragement and feedback.
Tier 3 supports offer even extra structure for kids who require assistance exceeding Tier 1 and Tier 2. A behavior plan developed by the RTI team could be part of a Tier 3 intervention strategy. Teaching staff can identify Tier 3 services, but parents are probably engaged in their execution and reinforcement. If the actual cause of the undesirable behavior has been recognized, Tier 3 interventions can be pretty beneficial. Counseling programs will deliver strategic support to pupils in order to help them modify their behavioral reactions. Teachers and parents can organize behavior sessions to manage student behavior and track improvement (Shepherd & Linn, 2015). This is also a platform for parents to learn abilities that will allow them to support their children outside of the classroom.
RTI, like any other methodology, has benefits and drawbacks. One advantage is that the practice is compatible with inclusive classroom management and international design. RTI’s other benefits include focusing on the student’s accomplishments, prompt identification and education, and the fact that students do not have to fail before receiving interventions. The RTI technique has the drawback of instilling false confidence in the effectiveness of evaluation and instruction (Shepherd & Linn, 2015). Other disadvantages of RTI include the lack of a procedure for measuring cognitive capacities, the inability of the technique to differentiate between kids with different impairments and slow learners, and the lack of scientific evidence to substantiate its efficacy (Shepherd & Linn, 2015).
Reference
Shepherd, T. L., & Linn, D. (2015). Behavior and classroom management in the multicultural classroom. SAGE Publication.