Being a minority in a foreign country is not easy; the issue concerning the rights of minorities and the unequal forces of minorities and the majority have been discussed long enough.
We will write a custom Report on Revisiting the Minority Issue Viewed from a Statistical Standpoint: The Discovery of the Century specifically for you
301 certified writers online
However, due to the influx of immigrants into the U.S., as well as the development of the minority infrastructure and the increase in the birthrates among minorities, the latter can actually become the national majority quite soon, according to what Dougherty states in his article Minority births are new majority in The Wall Street Journal.
Dealing with the amount of Hispanic babies that have been born and the rates of death among the Hispanic children, the article offers the data that can be considered from a mathematical viewpoint for making further assumptions as per rise of the birth of the Hispanic children and the veracity of the statement concerning the minority turning into the majority.
As the data provided by Dougherty say, the minimum amount of newborn Hispanic babies is the daily 1.8, whereas the maximum statistics for the Hispanic newborns makes 2.4 per day (Dougherty, 2012, May 17).
Before calculating the popular mean, one has to produce the variables; in the given case, these can be 1.9, 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3. As for the annual increment of the Hispanic population, it is necessary to mention that of 1,025 annually born children, 1,000 die every year in the Hispanic areas of the state.
Therefore, the popular mean for the Hispanic children born per day is 1/25(1.9 + 2.1 + 2.2. + 2.3) = 0.38. Therefore, the population mean for the given research makes 0.38, which means that the annual increase of the number of Hispanics is upward, yet is rather humble.
Defining the margin of error that the calculations in the given article have will be more complicated, since Dougherty does not offer any specific information on the issue. However, with the help of several calculations, one can possibly define the margin of error.
If taking a closer look at what the article has to offer, one will see that none of the statistical data has hundredth; there are only decimals: “Data for 2010 show Hispanic women give birth to 2.4 babies on average, compared with 1.8 babies for non-Hispanic whites”.
Hence, it can be concluded that each of the statistical numbers has been rounded either up or down at least 0.01, which gives the reasons to conclude that the margin of error in the given paper makes 0.1, or 10%.
Given the fact that ἀ equals 0.9 in the given case, as the previous calculations say, the confidence interval for the given research can be calculated easily.
Following the formula for the expectation value will lead to defining the confidence interval. Since n equals 25 (1,025 annually born Hispanic babies minus 1,000 annually dying), it can be concluded that the confidence interval in the given example is going to make
Therefore, it is clear that the statistical data offered by Dougherty are very accurate. In the light of the above-mentioned, the issue concerning the national minorities is yet to be resolved.
Though it is clear that the Hispanics are increasing in number, there are yet social, economical and financial factors to be considered before offering a defining result.
Dougherty, C. (2012, May 17). Minority births are new majority. The Wall Street Journal. Web.