Risk management professionals are to identify, analyze, and document risks that are associated with a company’s business operations. In the case that something goes wrong, a company is likely to be charged; such specialists are also to defend due diligence. It implies the reversing of the burden of proof. In other words, an accused person or a company’s representative is to prove that, on a balance of probability, the requirements of the defense have been fulfilled (DuPlessis et al., 2019). In business content, due diligence is often referred to as an investigation conducted to manage commercial risks.
It is possible to outline management steps that demonstrate a defense of due diligence. Regardless of the type of anticipated offense, the required points are the following. Implement a plan for the identification of all the potential workplace hazards and consider the possible corrective actions to prevent them from happening (DuPlessis et al., 2019). Ensure that copies of occupational health and safety policies, practices, and procedures are in place and signed by employees. It can be complemented with internal safety audits and serve the evidence that the employer ensures that all the workers are familiar with rules for safety fulfilled (DuPlessis et al., 2019). Ensure the provision of appropriate training to all employees while keeping a record of the dates and education programs. Implement a program for monitoring workplaces to ensure compliance with health and safety policies is fulfilled (DuPlessis et al., 2019). Finally, it is vital to establish a document for accident reporting and investigation that would enable to revision of circumstances of cases that occurred. It is most likely that relying on the defense on due diligence will be successful if the mentioned steps are implemented before an accident.
Reference
DuPlessis, D., Enman, S., O’Byrne, S., Adams L. M., & King, P. (2019). Canadian business and the law (7th ed.). Nelson Education.