Updated:

Routing Protocols: RIP, EIGRP, and OSPF Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

The current project involves more than 50 routers with a multiple-site orientation. The scope of the current project entails the use of interior protocols such as RIP, EIGRP, and OSPF. In this article, we analyze these protocols and comprehend their feasibility in this scenario. There are two kinds of concepts on which most of the modern day internal routing protocols are based.

One is Distance-vector routing and the other is Link-state routing. In Distance-vector routing protocols routers notify other routers about its distance from them. After receiving such information, a router calculates the costs associated and determines network paths in the system. It requires to be periodically informed about topological changes. In Link-state, routing each router contains information about the entire network topology in the form of maps. It advertises its interface status to other routers in the system. Each router determines the best possible delivery path individually. (Loscrì & Rango, 2007)

Link-state routers converge fast but require more resources and increase network traffic. Distance-vector protocols score over Link-state protocols as they have less computational complexities and message overhead. However, scalability is an issue with Distance-vector routing because they are typically suited to small networks.

RIPv2 is a very widely used protocol and is an enhancement of the RIP, which is a long-existing protocol. About bandwidth utilization, a RIP router broadcasts a record of reachable networks and subnets with the help of a timer generally set at 30 seconds. The maximum hop count is set at 15 and the hold down time is 180 seconds. It is straightforward to put into operation, configure, and control, and operates with little overhead. However, it is useful only for small networks and is not a viable option for large networks with increased number of routers and nodes. (Zhang & Ming, 2007)

Enhanced Internet Gateway Routing protocol is conceptually similar to IGRP and is a distance-vector protocol with better scalability. Unlike the RIP the hop, count is not restricted at 15 and thus it can reach further distances. EIGRP disseminates its routing information to its neighbors and records information received form them. It also sends hello packets to update other routers on the network about new routers being added. It minimizes routing instability, makes use of bandwidth efficiently in kilobits per second and converges quickly. However, it is a Cisco proprietary and works best with Cisco products only. (Loscrì & Rango, 2007)

OSPF calculates paths routes packets derived from the target IP address found in IP packets. It facilitates variable-length subnet masking, and can identify alterations in the network topology very fast and converges to a loop-free routing configuration in a matter of seconds. Individual elements of the database are updated at a 30-minute time interval, when there are no topological changes. The link-bandwidth increases with the increase in the database size. This consumes a huge amount of router memory.

With OSPF, scalability becomes a major issue. The presence of more than 50 routers would result in slower convergence time, memory shortages and processor overloading. Hence, it may be said that it is an excellent protocol to be used for medium sized networks. (Zhang & Ming, 2007) After evaluating the above protocols, in light of the project requirements, EIGRP is the recommended protocol.

Although RIP and OSPF both offer their own advantages and are very efficient in their own sense they face major issues when applied to large networks. Further, EIGRP offer various advantages such as low bandwidth usage and instability minimizing capability. Hence, EIGRP is the most efficient protocol that can be applied to this network containing more than 50 routers connecting multiple sites.

References

Loscrì, V., Rango, F. (2007). Mobile Networks Ad hoc on demand multipath distance vector routing (AOMDV) over a distributed TDMA MAC protocol for QoS support in wireless ad hoc networks: integration issues and performance evaluation. European Transactions on Telecommunications. 18(2), 141-156

Zhang, C., Ming, Y. (2007). Ad hoc network routing and security: A review. International Journal of Communication Systems. 20(8), 909-925.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, November 6). Routing Protocols: RIP, EIGRP, and OSPF. https://ivypanda.com/essays/routing-protocols-rip-eigrp-and-ospf/

Work Cited

"Routing Protocols: RIP, EIGRP, and OSPF." IvyPanda, 6 Nov. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/routing-protocols-rip-eigrp-and-ospf/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Routing Protocols: RIP, EIGRP, and OSPF'. 6 November.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Routing Protocols: RIP, EIGRP, and OSPF." November 6, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/routing-protocols-rip-eigrp-and-ospf/.

1. IvyPanda. "Routing Protocols: RIP, EIGRP, and OSPF." November 6, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/routing-protocols-rip-eigrp-and-ospf/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Routing Protocols: RIP, EIGRP, and OSPF." November 6, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/routing-protocols-rip-eigrp-and-ospf/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1