The journal titled “Psychological Science” was used as the scientific resource that published the article in question. Regarding sponsorship, the study was supported by grants from several foundations. As sponsors, the following organizations were involved: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Richard Parsons Family Foundation, the James Irvine Foundation, and the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Additional expert support was also provided by several specialists.
As a methodology used by the authors to perform their experiment, a random selection of participants was carried out following the ethnicity criterion. Antonio et al. (2004) utilized the screening survey as the main tool for collecting data from the involved members. Three institutes engaged in research activities became platforms for the study, which made it possible to expand the range of assessments and attract more collaborators. The participants’ responses were used as the main resource for the analysis and interpretation.
The main conclusions of the study were obtained by evaluating the data collected from the target members. The statistical methods of analysis were utilized to identify averages and highlight relevant trends in the responses. Individual characteristics, such as background characteristics and racial factors, were the key determinants of variation in the participants’ views.
The data of the collaborators supervising the course of the study were also taken into account to obtain an objective assessment of the results. The aspects that affected the perception of the study members regarding the topic in question were reviewed. The distribution of collaborators by race was aimed at achieving the accuracy of the analysis. By comparing all the variables and evaluating the participants’ views, the main conclusions regarding the topic raised were made.
Reference
Antonio, A. L., Chang, M. J., Hakuta, K., Kenny, D. A., Levin, S., & Milem, J. F. (2004). Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science, 15(8), 507-510.