Introduction
Qualitative research may be crucial to expanding the existing breadth of post-delivery care knowledge. Thus, the paper “Parental experiences of providing skin-to-skin care to their newborn infant” by Anderzen-Carlsson, Lamy, and Eriksson (2014) aims to describe parents’ various experiences with skin-to-skin contact (SSC). As such, the article is vital for understanding the psychological processes of both participating parties and remains relevant to increasing the quality of provided post-partum care.
Methodology
The study’s impeccable methodology defends the quality of its results. The researchers used a data extraction method to obtain information about parents’ subjective experiences (Anderzen-Carlsson et al., 2014). A qualitative approach seems to be most beneficial for this type of research since the article’s objective links with analysing the sentiment felt by mothers and fathers during SSC, rather than a clear hypothesis (Cristancho, Goldszmidt, Lingard, & Watling, 2018; McCusker & Gunaydin, 2015).
Anderzen-Carlsson et al. (2014) justify the research design under a formulate-extract-appraise methodology, choosing articles with a solely qualitative methodological base using both systematic and manual searching techniques to select studies from four databases. Thus, data was collected in a way that reflected the objective of the research issue.
Analysis
The conducted analysis allows making a statement about the results’ integrity. The primary means of research was meta-data analysis using NVivo computer software, a reliable program that facilitates the research process, which analysed relevant original quotations and helped categorise the uplifted data into 19 distinct categories (Anderzen-Carlsson et al., 2014; Zamawe, 2015). Potential bias was removed by having multiple researchers appraise articles using an impartial Primary Research Appraisal Form, and the initial literature searches were performed twice to secure the result’s actuality (Anderzen-Carlsson et al., 2014).
Anderzen-Carlsson et al. (2014) tackle each of the 19 defined categories in detail, presenting a definite conclusion regarding the research question regarding the various psychological states of parents post-delivery and during SSC. It is important to note that the researchers did not explicitly discuss any ethical issues raised by the study.
Conclusion
The research attains its goals, and it could be worth continuing from a viewpoint that deals with parental experiences directly or relates to solely paternal experiences. The discussion tackles the range of experienced emotions and their implications for post-partum care, as well as the limitations of their research, such as an overabundance of mothers compared to fathers. Therefore, the paper successfully refines the existing data on the topic of SSC’s effect on parents post-delivery.
References
Anderzen-Carlsson, A., Lamy, Z. C., & Eriksson, M. (2014). Parental experiences of providing skin-to-skin care to their newborn infant – Part 1: A qualitative systematic review. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9(1), 1-22. Web.
Cristancho, S. M., Goldszmidt, M., Lingard, L., & Watling, C. (2018). Qualitative research essentials for medical education. Singapore Medical Journal, 59(12), 622-627. Web.
McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2015). Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion, 30(7), 1-6. Web.
Zamawe, F. C. (2015). The implication of using NVivo software in qualitative data analysis: Evidence-based reflections. Malawi Medical Journal, 27(1), 13-15. Web.