Interaction between Social and Cognitive in Social Cognitive Theory
While considering the interaction between social and cognitive, specific attention should be paid to changing behaviors. The cognitive dimension strongly relates to the way people respond to challenges. They should practice self-efficacy to generate meaning and values. Regardless of the environment, physical state, psychological characteristics, and social roles an individual performs, it is important to acquire the meaning of life.
Human nature, therefore, should depend on external factors, but the main role of a human being lies in changing the reality he/she lives in by exercising such qualities as dignity, respect, and meaningfulness of life. This is at this point that human beings establish interaction between social and cognitive. Humans should respond to consciousness because it defines the actual essence of humanness. Responding to the self means reacting to the things and events surrounding people. In such a way, individuals can evaluate their human potential by cognizing the social realm.
Thus, the interactive process implies the constant interaction of an individual with the environment. A person, therefore, can receive responses from beyond that can trigger human potential and change behavioral patterns to be able to face difficulties. The established dualism between the individual and the common stands at the core of all human relationships. Therefore, the individual should realize that the environment depends largely on the thinking and response mechanism.
The social setting can either be full of meaning or reflect the existential vacuum of emptiness. Understanding what the definition of a man should cover will allow people to reveal the key to improvement and enhancement of individual capacity. Searching for meaning, therefore, is strongly associated with the ability to overcome challenges and express commitment to the value of life.
The difference in Explanation for Behavior in Social Network Theory and Health Belief Model
Social Network Theory is premised on the assumption that people are constantly interacting with the social environment. Therefore, the relations between a human and the environment trigger human development, as well as understanding of further purposes and goals in life. Changing attitude is the main pathway to improving reality. Besides, social network theory views human behavior as a reaction of relationships in a social network. Within the context, individuals are represented as nodes tied with external realms. The presented scheme of nodes and ties shapes the social capital of humans.
Health Belief Model refers to the social cognitive theory and implies the prediction of behavioral responses to therapeutic approaches during treatment. The attitude to the treatment of both the patient and the person who is engaged in the treatment itself identifies the prediction of behaviors in the future. Individuals’ assessment of the conditions and result of the treatment will influence their further aspiration to fight with the diseases.
Unlike Social Network Theory, which is based on the relations between people and personal evaluation of these relations, Health Belief Model is more focused on how individual responses can affect the way an individual assesses his/her personal behaviors and reactions. In addition, the Health Belief Model considers the role and impact of gender, sex, and other social factors on the responding mechanism, which is insignificant within the framework of Social Network Theory. Shifts in priorities here constitute the major differences between the two models of perceiving and responding to the environment. Thus, the Health Belief Model is more focused on reactions and behaviors whereas Social Network Theory seeks to define how those reactions influence the environment.