Solution
Drug addiction is a severe issue for each person afflicted with the illness and his or her family, as well as for the state and society at large. This means that preventing drug addiction should happen concurrently at the state and family levels (Kovera, 2019). The following areas are the focus of state efforts to combat drug addiction. To stop the spread of drugs, it is first imperative to take action against the illegal trafficking of all drugs, even those that are illegal (Kovera, 2019).
Additionally, there should be active propaganda campaigns (Kovera, 2019). Education concerning the adverse effects and risks of drug addiction ought to be carried out by several social institutions, such as schools, colleges, and universities. Propaganda against drugs should also be distributed via the media, including radio, television, newspapers, magazines, and banners. Healthy values and skills that aid in societal adaptation must be instilled in the younger generation at the home level. However, when employed at the family level, governmental tactics like direct propaganda and punitive acts are unlikely to contribute to the desired outcome.
One of the primary responsibilities of the rule of law is the prosecution of violent crimes. To this purpose, a range of strategies are implemented to deter violent crimes, apprehend and prosecute offenders, and safeguard potential victims through social rehabilitation (Kovera, 2019). Preventive measures aim to stop violent crimes and create environments that deter people from committing crimes (Kovera, 2019).
One of these tactics is educating locals on the laws, their rights and obligations, and the consequences of committing violent crimes. Educating residents on the laws, their rights and responsibilities, and the repercussions of committing violent crimes is one of these strategies. Furthermore, social support interventions — that is, helping those in challenging circumstances in order to lessen their likelihood of committing violent crimes — will be successful (Kovera, 2019). Increasing the quantity and caliber of police officers, investigators, and the prosecutor’s office are a few examples of such actions. Modern tools and technology should also be made available to law enforcement organizations so they can effectively investigate violent crimes.
Punishment
The illegal acquisition, handling, production, and processing of drugs, psychoactive substances, or their analogs with the goal of marketing them widely requires the imposition of penalties. The criminal should receive a fine of up to three months’ worth of the convicted person’s salary or other income, up to two years of remand labor, or up to three years in jail. Liability for non-medical use of psychotropic substances, opioid medicines, and their precursors in public areas should be included in the criminal code.
Currently, administrative accountability is intended for such an act, but in order to address drug addiction, these regulations must be strengthened. It is imperative to consider drug usage as a criminal violation. Punishment for its commission ought to include community service, a fine, an arrest, or prison work (Harding et al., 2019). A one-year minimum statute of limitations for criminal prosecution must also be established at the same time.
Restriction of freedom is a sort of punishment that must be provided for significant offenses. It entails keeping the guilty individual under supervision in a particular institution, away from society. Persons sentenced to restriction of liberty must be held in correctional centers within the region at the place of permanent residence or conviction, where they serve their sentence (Harding et al., 2019).
Local executive bodies are obliged to assist the bodies executing the restriction of freedom in the labor and household arrangements of persons sent to serve their sentences. The term of restriction of freedom must be set from one year to five years (Harding et al., 2019). Suppose an individual tries to avoid serving a sentence that involves restrictions on their freedom. In that case, the court has the authority to substitute the unfinished term of such restrictions with a time of deprivation of liberty (Harding et al., 2019). In addition, the time spent serving the limitation of freedom is deducted from the total sentence at the rate of one day of incarceration for every day the restriction of freedom is in place.
Possibility of Rehabilitation
A former drug addict might transform, reconcile inner conflicts, and gain confidence via rehabilitation. Treatment is essential because it is the only path toward reintegrating a former drug user into society. The life of a drug addict is collapsing in all directions, with professional skills, interest in work, and study lost. The circle of acquaintances is changing; there are practically no old friends among them, and personalities appear concerned only with the extraction and use of surfactants (Atkin-Plunk, 2020). Relations with relatives deteriorate due to the constant deception on the part of the dependent.
Later, substantial health problems and mental disorders are added to this. The restoration of broken ties and the elimination of the consequences of taking a narcotic substance is the main goal of rehabilitation. Drug withdrawal cannot be considered a completed course of treatment (Atkin-Plunk, 2020). It takes a long time to eliminate harmful psychological bindings and habits, replace them with positive aspirations, and teach the dependent to solve problems without surfactants. Rehabilitation of a former drug addict allows them to change, resolve internal contradictions, and develop self-confidence(Atkin-Plunk, 2020). It is the only way to integrate a former drug addict into society; therefore, it is vital.
Rehabilitation programs ought to be required if violent offenders want to reintegrate into society. It is possible to identify the main problems of criminals in modern society. These are employment problems, cultural adaptation, preservation of social ties with loved ones, relatives, and family, and housing problems (Atkin-Plunk, 2020). Reproduction of normal family relationships is also an essential factor in the success or failure of social rehabilitation. The overwhelming majority of those released from prison strive to return to their family (Atkin-Plunk, 2020).
Restoring communication links is another of the most critical processes of rehabilitating former prisoners and establishing conflict-free relations in society. To address the issue of social rehabilitation and assistance in the adaptation of former criminals, it is necessary to identify and, if possible, solve these problems. To do this, within the rehabilitation framework, it is necessary to create conditions for convicts to obtain specialties that are in demand at vocational and technical education enterprises (Atkin-Plunk, 2020).
In addition, rehabilitation should restore lost public relations and provide medical, socio-economic, professional, and psychological assistance. Moreover, rehabilitation programs allow for the prevention of recidivism (Atkin-Plunk, 2020). Therefore, to return to the public functionality of violent criminals, rehabilitation programs should be mandatory.
References
Atkin-Plunk, C. A. (2020). Should all violent offenders be treated equally? Perceptions of punishment and rehabilitation for violent offenders with varying attributes. Victims and Offenders, 15(2), 218-242. Web.
Harding, D., Morenoff, J. D., Nguyen, A. P., Bushway, S. D., & Binswanger, I. A. (2019). A natural experiment study of the effects of imprisonment on violence in the community. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(7), 671-677. Web.
Kovera, M. B. (2019). Racial disparities in the criminal justice system: Prevalence, causes, and a search for solutions. Journal of Social Issues, 75(4), 1139-1164. Web.