Problem Identification
Different variables significantly influence the quality of learning among students with disabilities. According to studies, the major challenges affecting the implementation framework of the vital process entails impartiality and the availability of adequate teaching and training resources (Dirth and Branscombe, 2018). Scholars further articulate it is crucial to enhance the structural mainframe steering the educational system on special learning opportunities (Dirth and Branscombe, 2018). On the one hand, the individuals with disabilities encounter apt sociological problem of stereotyping attributing to the low self-esteem. On the other hand, the personnel counter the stress through distinctive practices, such as drug and alcohol addiction. Ideally, it is the core responsibility of the relevant stakeholders to establish programs enhancing the institutionalization of dynamic special educational outliers across the schools.
Disability is an impairment of the body towards performing certain tasks hence intensifying the difficulty in engaging in dynamic practices. Researchers argue that the divergent state of the condition poses varying effect to the response and the essence of effective learning spectrum (Dirth and Branscombe, 2018). According to the investigation, different personnel experience distinctive impairments thus compromising the effective learning quotient. Primarily, it is critical to focus on the interdependence between the sociological environment and the capacities in the learning institutions. Incompetency among teachers threatens the appeals among children with disability attributing to a profound implication on marginalization.
A preteen and teenager is at a developmental phase that involves identifying the personal traits and choosing the best character traits. It is a notion that El Talla et al. (2019) utilizes to justify the necessity of intensifying evidence-based learning. Primarily, the adolescents make their decisions based on the acquired knowledge and experience to justify the resolution. As a result, there is higher tendencies of indiscipline cases due to the cognitive-behavioral theoretical framework. Cognitive-behavioral theory establishes that there is an interdependent relationship between behavior, emotions, and cognition. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the teachers to integrate the values of the theoretical construct to enhance equal treatment among the personalities. The initiative attributes to the effective interaction and engagement between teachers and adolescent learners for optimal knowledge and skills acquisition.
Effective education policies and practices positively impact preteens and teenagers during the learning process. The optimal acquisition of knowledge and skills is an essential factor for individuals with disabilities due to the trickle-down effect of the benefits based on increased population of highly competent labor capital. However, Harzallah (2018) establishes that it is the responsibility of the relevant stakeholders to ensure the incorporation of distinct theoretical practices, such as cognitive-behavioral and social learning theories. It is an initiative that the researcher further establishes profoundly influences the appeal concerning self-awareness among the students. The strategy boosts the understanding and mentorship by instructors to the adolescents with minimal confrontational fronts during lecture sessions. The main aim in the education sector concerning preteens and teenagers with disabilities enshrines promoting the effective enlightenment on dynamic foundational outliers and practice.
Research questions
- What are the parameters significantly influencing the provision of special education among children with disability?
- Sub-research questions:
- What is the effective assisting technology promoting effective delivery of special education among children with disability?
- What is the importance of inclusion in the implementation of special education provision among children with disability?
- What is the remedy towards boosting the promotional special education program among children with disability?
Research Aims
One of the key purposes for the study involves deriving insights on the dynamic issues influencing the effective implementation of the special education program among children with disability. In this case, the comparative analysis contributes to the pool of details on the interdependence of values concerning learning and the significance of the sociological environment. Previous studies focus on variant issues within the spectrum mainly encapsulating the implication of discrimination towards the psychological well-being of the counterparts. Further, scholars investigate the consequence of technological advancement in the modelling of learners’ curriculum for competent academic performance. The in-depth assessment of the interdependent relationship between the dependent and independent quotients renders a proficient overview of the significance of all stakeholders’ inclusion. On the one hand, the evolving society is a multifaceted domain with an apt intersectionality of interactions and the influential digitalization. On the other hand, the segregation towards children with disability encompasses the integration of policy remedies promoting the advocacy of special education. The critical accountability factor involves incorporating aspects to improve acquisition of knowledge and skills.
This research topic explores the essence of special education provision among children with disability. In this case, one of the elements I would like to understand better enshrines the core values affecting the effective implementation of the program across the American schools. The assessment attributes to the comprehension of the significance of curriculum and optimal training among teachers. Therefore, the study fosters the derivation of insights concerning the needs of the children with disability while establishing recommended practices to boost the efficacy quotient. A different component that I would like to understand better is the potent levels of integrating technological tools within the learning process. Despite the impairment, computerization renders opportunities to maximize personal capabilities on distinctive engagements. As a result, it is critical to apprehend the divergence of automated systems towards amplifying quality education among individuals with disability. Ideally, optimal performance among the learners relies on the environmental condition and healthy well-being.
Literature Review
The provision of special education among children with disabilities is a multidimensional phenomenon that impacts the learning process efficiency. According to Hornby (2015), the perceptive approach is a context regarding an interplay and reconstruction of crucial objectives to ensure effectiveness during the implementation process. In this case, the researcher argues that the vital indicators on inclusivity quotient encompass social justice, human rights consideration, and valuing diversity (Hornby, 2015). Distinct principles outline the recommended procedural framework on special education practice.
One of the major challenges across the learning institutions enshrines the lack of insights regarding the strategies contributing to apt indulgence of students. Hornby (2015) indicates that the core principles of inclusive education engulf reconstructing the school curricula for indepth problem and solution-oriented concepts, appreciating diversity, reflective studies, and developing a learning community (Hornby, 2015). The main aim of the special educational mainframe enshrines the amplification on the recalibration of the educational environment for children with disabilities (Tabroni et al., 2022). Therefore, it is critical to integrate values on participatory quotient of all entities to enhance the pool of moral and ethical foundations on engagement portfolio.
Apart from attaining knowledge and skills, promoting education among children with disabilities significantly contributes to the character development among the personnel. In the study by Tabroni et al. (2022), the scholars notice a profound influence of inclusive learning among students based on personality traits than cognitive behavioral aspect. The main reason lies in the effect of a social environment recalibrating the interactive quotients and aspects among the individuals. Therefore, an inclusive special education is a necessity on account of intensifying the capacity for determining an identity within the spectrum (Hornby, 2015). As a multifaceted continuum, learning among children with disability optimally depends on the reconstructed surrounding and the participation of all stakeholders.
Methodology
This chapter focuses on the dynamic methods used to collect, analyze, and present the preliminary information. Therefore, the researcher demonstrates the distinctive aspects of design, sampling, collection, and analysis dimensions. The research will take place in New York City due to the significant ethnic diversity.
Research Design
The researcher will utilize the survey design and an exploratory approach in analysing the key objectives of the study. In this case, the main insights onto the relevance of the topical issue involve using semi-structured questionnaires and scheduling interviews with relevant authorities. The two data collection practices prominently intensify the interconnectivity between the interviewee and interviewer. Apart from the interconnection, the practice fosters the adept collection of data used during the research process
Sample Size and Sampling Procedures
The research will use a sample size of 200 respondents from different regions in America. The participants will encompass government representatives working in the education sector, parents to children with disability, humanitarian aid non-government organization officials, and dynamic corporate leaders. The main reason for the selection of the respondents enshrines intensifying the collection of divergent appeals concerning the challenges individuals with disability encounter during the learning process. The researcher will recruit the interviewees by conducting a pilot study to assess the viability and reliability of the data collection tools. Therefore, the researcher will inform the participants regarding the key objective of the activity thus the importance of providing authentic responses.
Data Collection Methods and Research Instruments
The structure of the questionnaires will involve open and closed questions that assist in the apt gathering of details from the respondents from the analysis. The interview questions will be open-ended to enhance addressing the key issues. Notably, the questionnaires and interview sessions will focus on government representatives, communities, religious entities, and the respective professional bodies.
Validity
The study’s validity will involve the structuring of the questionnaire based on the ability of the respondents to answer all queries. In this case, the researcher will conduct a pilot study to affirm the proficiency essence among the respondents in understanding and answering the inherent questions.
Reliability
The researcher will use the test-retest approach within the questionnaire to affirm the reliability quotient based on the provided answers. The approach encapsulates the prominent use of repeat questions by paraphrasing to ensure that the respondent understands and is sincere during the data collection process. Further, the researcher will hire a research assistant whose role involves offering assistance among the respondents to understand the questions and answers. As a result, the process fosters the attainment of minimal spoilt questionnaires for the analysis aspect.
Data Analysis
The data will be collected using the questionnaires and interview sessions, coded, analyzed, and presented through a research paper. In this case, the researcher will utilize quantitative and qualitative aspects to enhance the reliability and objectivity of the process. The researcher will further use inferential and descriptive statistics in the comparative aspects of the interdependent relationships among the quotients. As a result, the researcher integrates the ANOVA tables and figures to better comprehend the objectives and the respective hypothesis.
Ethical Consideration
The researcher will observe prominent ethical practices during the study. In this case, the researcher will use in-text citations and include a reference page at the end of the paper as evident documentation of the ethical recognition of previous researchers. Additionally, the researcher will include the age and signature sections in the questionnaires and interview documents to ensure ethical compliance with the legal consent age of respondents. Apart from the consensual essence, the researcher will ensure the balance of gender representation during data collection as an ethical consideration approach.
Reference List
El Talla, S.A., FarajAllah, A.M., Abu-Naser, S.S. & Al Shobaki, M.J. (2019) ‘Intermediate role of the criterion of focus on the students benefiting in the relationship between adopting the criterion of partnership and resources and achieving community satisfaction in the Palestinian universities.’ International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR), 3(5), 86-100. Web.
Dirth, T.P. & Branscombe, N.R. (2018) ‘The social identity approach to disability: bridging disability studies and psychological science.’ Psychological Bulletin, 144(12), p.1300. Web.
Harzallah, H. (2018) ‘Palestinian teachers’ views on the factors that limit students’ creativity and some possible strategies to overcome them.’ Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 3(2), 40-57. Web.
Hornby, G. (2015). ‘Inclusive special education: Development of a new theory for the education of children with special educational needs and disabilities.’ British Journal of Special Education, 42(3), 234-256. Web.
Tabroni, I., Bagus, S., Uwes, S., Drajad, M. & Bahijah, I. (2022). ‘The learning process of children with special needs at Salsabila inclusive school, Purwakarta.’ Fikroh: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 15(1), 52-62. Web.
Indicative Bibliography
Baykal, G.E., Van Mechelen, M. & Eriksson, E. (2020). Collaborative technologies for children with special needs: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-13). Web.
Broomhead, K.E. (2019). Acceptance or rejection? The social experiences of children with special educational needs and disabilities within a mainstream primary school. Education 3-13, 47(8), 877-888. Web.
Dhiman, S., Sahu, P.K., Reed, W.R., Ganesh, G.S., Goyal, R.K. & Jain, S. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on mental health and perceived strain among caregivers tending children with special needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 107. Web.
Gurney, P.W. (2018). Self-esteem in children with special educational needs. Routledge.
Kauffman, J.M., Hallahan, D.P., Pullen, P.C. & Badar, J. (2018). Special education: What it is and why we need it. Routledge.