Stakeholders vs. Shareholders: Ethics in the Workplace Case Study

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Written by Human No AI

This video presents a debate about the ethical responsibilities of businesses and their managers. In particular, the discussion is focused on the conflict between the interests of shareholders and stakeholders (“Stakeholders vs. Shareholders”). The participants advance different arguments about the way in which enterprises should approach their obligations. Overall, it seems that the recognition of stakeholders’ needs is essential for the sustainable development of companies.

This conflict is closely related to the functions that businesses are expected to perform. Firstly, these organizations are supposed to increase their revenues and benefit shareholders or owners. However, there is an alternative viewpoint according to which managers should take into account the interests of stakeholders or various individuals and groups that may be affected by the work of businesses. For instance, it is possible to consider the needs of workers, customers, communities, trade unions, and so forth.

The key issue is that the concept of a stakeholder does not exclude the owners of a business. In this case, managers are not required to disregard such issues as financial performance and revenues. Nevertheless, they have to ensure that their activities do not pose a threat to other people and their interests. For example, in some cases, the work of enterprises can endanger the environment (The Saylor Foundation 628). If these risks are overlooked, companies can threaten the welfare of many communities. Moreover, this reckless approach can destroy the economic resources that these organizations need.

To some degree, this discussion indicates that the emphasis on stakeholders’ needs is critical for ensuring that the work of companies does not threaten the welfare of society. This approach does not force businesses to reject such priorities as financial performance and the needs of owners. More likely, it emphasizes the necessity to introduce safeguards reducing the risk of unethical practices that harm other people.

Works Cited

YouTube, uploaded by Berkeley Haas. 2010. Web.

The Saylor Foundation. “What is Business Ethics?” Saylor. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, July 15). Stakeholders vs. Shareholders: Ethics in the Workplace. https://ivypanda.com/essays/stakeholders-vs-shareholders-ethics-in-the-workplace/

Work Cited

"Stakeholders vs. Shareholders: Ethics in the Workplace." IvyPanda, 15 July 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/stakeholders-vs-shareholders-ethics-in-the-workplace/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Stakeholders vs. Shareholders: Ethics in the Workplace'. 15 July.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Stakeholders vs. Shareholders: Ethics in the Workplace." July 15, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/stakeholders-vs-shareholders-ethics-in-the-workplace/.

1. IvyPanda. "Stakeholders vs. Shareholders: Ethics in the Workplace." July 15, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/stakeholders-vs-shareholders-ethics-in-the-workplace/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Stakeholders vs. Shareholders: Ethics in the Workplace." July 15, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/stakeholders-vs-shareholders-ethics-in-the-workplace/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, you can request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1