State of Connecticut v. Eric Amado Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Summary

In the State of Connecticut v. Eric Amado (State v. Amado, supra, 42 Conn. App. 351-56), the court found the defendant guilty of two counts of murder, two counts of felony, and one count of a capital felony. The trial court merged the all convictions and sentenced the defendant to life imprisonment. The defendant had gone to the home of Anthony Young and fired gunshots that killed Young and Peter Hall. The defendant claimed that he killed the two men in self-defense as they had started to draw their guns to shoot him. However, the court dismissed the defendant’s claim.

Facts

In this case, Amado went to Young’s home to confront him after realizing that Young had stolen his cocaine. During the confrontation, the defendant fired five gunshots that wounded Young and Hall fatally. When the medical personnel came to offer medical assistance to the men, they found both men alive. The medical personnel found each of the men holding a loaded gun. Both Young and Hall died later due to gunshot wounds. The fact that both men were holding guns when the medical personnel arrived shows that there was a confrontation between the defendant and both men.

Issues

The major issue in the case is whether one can use self-defense in felony murder.

Holding

The defendant committed felony murder, and could, therefore, not use defense or self-defense as an argument for his defense.

Opinion

The jury was of the opinion that self-defense is not admissible as a defense to a charge of felony murder. Therefore, regardless of whether the defendant committed the offense willingly or unwillingly, he is responsible for the murder of the two men. In addition, the defendant cannot prove his claim of self-defense sufficiently, since the murder occurred in the home of the victim. However, if the death of the victim had occurred in the home of the defendant, the claim of self-defense would have been admissible in court.

Notes

The defendant did not find himself in the victims by chance. He went to Young’s home with an ill motive. Therefore, he was ready for any outcome if there was a confrontation with the victim. The fact that the defendant went to Young’s home carrying a loaded gun shows that he was ready to confront Young using any means. He was ready to use force if necessary. Therefore, the defendant’s claim of self-defense is not admissible in court. The prosecution can prove the motive for the murder easily.

Objective

It is clear that the defendant had gone to Young’s home to confront him. Therefore, the defendant is the main source of the confrontation. If the defendant had not gone to the victim’s home, there would have been no confrontation or death of the victim. Due to the fact that Young was in his home, he has the right to defend himself from any individual who may trespass into his home with the intention of harming him. In so doing, Young may use all the necessary force to repel the aggressor. On the other hand, the defendant also has the right to protect himself if he feels that another party’s actions threaten his life. This case is a clear illustration of instances when self-defense is admissible in court. The notion of self-defense is not admissible if the defendant was at the victim’s home.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, May 6). State of Connecticut v. Eric Amado. https://ivypanda.com/essays/state-of-connecticut-v-eric-amado/

Work Cited

"State of Connecticut v. Eric Amado." IvyPanda, 6 May 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/state-of-connecticut-v-eric-amado/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'State of Connecticut v. Eric Amado'. 6 May.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "State of Connecticut v. Eric Amado." May 6, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/state-of-connecticut-v-eric-amado/.

1. IvyPanda. "State of Connecticut v. Eric Amado." May 6, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/state-of-connecticut-v-eric-amado/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "State of Connecticut v. Eric Amado." May 6, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/state-of-connecticut-v-eric-amado/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1