Introduction
The utilization of dynamic pricing has emerged as a viable approach for enterprises and institutions to enhance their financial gains. This mechanism enables enterprises to modify their pricing strategies in response to market supply and demand fluctuations. Auctions are a general approach to assessing the worth of commodities and amenities (Hendershott & Pagano, 2019).
The present study aims to conduct an in-depth examination of the comparative merits of surge pricing and congestion pricing. Additionally, it seeks to assess the efficacy of various auction types regarding value discovery while also scrutinizing auctions implemented by government agencies and for-profit enterprises (Wang, 2019). Furthermore, the study scrutinizes the auction process employed to sell the Wells Fargo consumer-facing banking division. This paper aims to provide insights into the effectiveness and potential drawbacks of pricing strategies and auction types through a comparative and contrasting analysis.
Surge Pricing versus Congestion Pricing
In order to optimize their revenue and mitigate traffic congestion in regions with high traffic, corporations and institutions utilize two pricing tactics: surge pricing and congestion pricing. The practice of surge pricing is employed during periods of high demand, whereby the prices of goods or services are adjusted upwards in response to the level of competition among consumers. Ride-sharing companies such as Uber and Lyft use surge pricing strategies during peak hours or festive seasons to increase fares (Hendershott & Pagano, 2019).
The principal aim of this methodology is to maximize revenue while maintaining an equilibrium between the availability and requirement of goods or services (Wang, 2019). The concept of congestion pricing entails implementing elevated prices during peak traffic periods to reduce road usage and mitigate traffic congestion. By implementing pricing strategies, enterprises and institutions can effectively and efficiently regulate the balance between demand and supply while minimizing costs.
In contrast to surge pricing, congestion pricing is a strategy designed to alleviate traffic congestion by implementing charges on drivers who enter heavily trafficked areas. The primary aims are to mitigate traffic congestion, improve air quality, and increase efficacy. The implementation of charges for drivers entering the city center during peak periods, as exemplified by the London congestion charge, is a notable instance of this particular strategy.
The pricing strategy is designed to dissuade superfluous journeys and encourage the adoption of alternative transportation modes (Wang, 2019). This approach reduces traffic volumes, enhancing vehicular flow within the urban area. To summarize, implementing congestion pricing is a beneficial strategy for promoting sustainable urban transportation and mitigating city traffic congestion issues.
English Auction versus Dutch Auction
English and Dutch auctions are two commonly employed bidding systems in auction settings. In an English auction, the bidding commences at a relatively low price point, and the auctioneer gradually increases the price in predetermined increments until there are no further bids from the participants (D’Acci, 2019). The auction modality frequently employed to trade high-end art pieces or collectibles is the ascending-bid auction, where the auctioneer’s objective is to secure the most elevated price achievable for the item.
The auction process concludes when a sole bidder remains, who is subsequently awarded the item (Wang, 2019). In contrast, Dutch auctions commence with an initial high price, which progressively diminishes until a purchaser agrees to the prevailing price. The auction format frequently employed for selling time-sensitive merchandise or raw materials involves expeditiously and equitably vending the item at a reasonable market value.
The Dutch auction differs from the English auction in that it commences with a relatively elevated price point that diminishes until a bidder elects to accept it. The individual who is the initial participant to agree to the offered price is designated as the successful acquirer of the item. The auction format commonly employed for selling commodities, such as flowers in a flower market, prioritizes the expeditious and effective sale of the goods by the auctioneer (D’Acci, 2019).
In contrast to the English auction, which involves a bidding process that persists until a sole bidder remains, the Dutch auction concludes immediately upon a bidder consenting to the proposed price (Wang, 2019). Utilizing this auction format guarantees the expeditious sale of items, mitigating the potential for spoilage or damage of perishable commodities. Additionally, employing the Dutch auction mechanism confers advantages to purchasers and vendors by fostering openness and impartiality in ascertaining the worth of commodities.
Sealed-Bid First-Price Auction versus Vickery Auction
In a sealed-bid first-price auction, all bids are submitted simultaneously, and the top bidder immediately pays the winning offer. Openness and fairness are paramount when selling government contracts, so the auction format is frequently used. Bidders in a sealed-bid first-price auction are unaware of each other’s offers until the winning bid is announced.
Therefore, prospective buyers should submit their highest and best bid (Wang, 2019). This kind of auction guarantees that the highest bidder is the one who cares about the object being auctioned. To fairly and efficiently distribute products and services, the sealed-bid first-price auction is often employed in both the commercial and governmental sectors.
In contrast to the sealed-bid first-price auction, the Vickrey Auction is a kind of sealed-bid auction in which the highest bidder wins the item but only pays the amount equivalent to the second-highest offer. This auction method encourages bidders to offer their genuine values, knowing that if they win, they will pay a price lower than their bid (Hendershott & Pagano, 2019). The Vickrey Auction is intended to prevent the winner’s curse, in which the winner overpays for an item and afterward regrets their choice (Wang, 2019). This auction type is typically used to sell products with subjective value or where buyers may have little knowledge regarding the item’s worth. The sale of Google’s initial public offering (IPO) shares is a noteworthy example of a Vickrey Auction, in which bidders entered their offers secretly, and the highest bidder won by paying the second-highest bid price.
Two standard auction formats for establishing a product’s market value are the sealed-bid first-price auction and the Vickrey auction. The winner of a Vickrey auction pays just the second-highest bid amount, whereas the winner of a sealed-bid first-price auction pays the amount they bid (Fang & Sun, 2020). In contrast to the Vickrey auction, which is used when bidders may have incomplete information about the item’s value and the goal is to encourage them to bid their accurate valuations, the sealed-bid first-price auction is appropriate for items with well-known values or when transparency is not a significant concern (Brown, 2019). Both types of auctions have been used in a wide variety of settings, from public sector contracts to art sales to IPOs. Seller motivations, item features, and the auction setting all factor into the format decision.
Actual Auctions Employed by State and Federal Government Agencies and For-Profit Businesses
State and Federal Government Auction
The FCC is a federal organization that oversees and regulates broadcast radio and television, as well as wired and wireless Internet, satellite, and cable television. The FCC is responsible for various tasks, including distributing wireless licenses for services like cellular and PCS networks. The FCC uses sealed-bid first-price auctions to choose the winners of specific licenses (Wang, 2019).
Bids are submitted simultaneously, and the license is awarded to the bidder who offers the highest price. Fair competition and effective use of scarce resources like radio spectrum are primary goals of the FCC’s auction process. The FCC’s goal in conducting license and auction processes is to encourage new ideas, healthy competition, and expand the communications sector.
Auctions are held by state governments in addition to the FCC, often to dispose of excess property and items like cars and office supplies. State governments may use different auction formats, such as online bidding on various platforms or live auctions (Zhu & Jin, 2020). In any situation, the winning bidder is often expected to make a complete payment immediately after the auction concludes (Wang, 2019). The ability of states to auction off their excess assets and collect the resulting funds is crucial. State governments may make better use of public funds and allow citizens and companies to save money by disposing of unused assets.
For-Profit Business Auction
Amazon is a for-profit company that sets its pricing via auctions. It is an online auction in the English style, where goods are listed and bid on by interested parties. In this auction, Amazon establishes a floor price for the item, and the buyer who offers the most for it is the winner (Zhu & Jin, 2020). Using this strategy, Amazon can maximize its profits by responding to shifts in supply and demand.
Amazon not only utilizes auctions to set pricing for its items but also for its advertising services. Auctions determine ad placement and pricing in Amazon’s Sponsored Products program (Fang & Sun, 2020). Amazon employs an auction system to choose which advertisements to display and the sequence. This auction approach gives all advertisers a level playing field and allows Amazon to optimize its advertising earnings.
The spot instance market is designed to be as open and transparent as possible by basing pricing on the number of bids and available capacity. Users may avoid overspending by limiting their bids to an amount they are comfortable spending. The bidding procedure concludes that the customers with the highest bids are allowed access to the computing resources at the bid price when AWS needs the unused capacity for its own reasons. In addition to increasing AWS’s bottom line, this technology helps companies save money on processing power. AWS can effectively manage its capacity and provide competitive pricing to its clients thanks to auctions to assign its computer resources.
Auction to Sell Wells Fargo Consumer-Facing Banking Division
A sealed-bid first-price or English auction might be used to sell Wells Fargo’s retail banking operations. In a first-price sealed-bid auction, potential buyers submit their bids anonymously, and the highest bidder is awarded the lot (Brown, 2019). On the other hand, a public English auction would see interested parties make competing bids in the open market until a single top bidder emerged to purchase the business unit. Both have merits and drawbacks, and the auctioneer must consider both when making a decision (Wang, 2019). The auction must be advertised to interested parties and monitored meticulously to maintain a level playing field for all bidders, regardless of the chosen format.
An alternative approach for auctioning Wells Fargo’s banking division that caters to consumers is the implementation of a Dutch auction. In this particular format, the auctioneer would establish an initial high price for the division and decrease the price incrementally until a prospective buyer expresses willingness to acquire it (Zhu & Jin, 2020). The division would be awarded to the initial bidder who agrees to the stipulated price, thereby being declared the successful bidder (Brown, 2019). This format may prove advantageous if Wells Fargo intends to divest the division above expeditiously and effectively. The determination of the auction format to be employed is contingent upon Wells Fargo’s objectives regarding the sale and the degree of attention from prospective purchasers.
Recommendations
This paper concludes that a sealed-bid first-price auction is the best method for selling Wells Fargo’s retail banking operations to the highest bidder. Government contract sales, comparable to the banking division sales regarding the requirement for openness, efficiency, and justice, have succeeded with this auction. Bids from prospective purchasers may be submitted simultaneously in a sealed-bid first-price auction, maintaining the integrity of the bidding process.
The highest bidder will be selected to purchase the banking section, and they will pay the sum they offered. This method will encourage competition among interested purchasers by preventing collusion and manipulating the bidding process. A sealed-bid first-price auction is easy to organize and run, so it may help to save time and money compared to other kinds of auctions. The sale of Wells Fargo’s retail banking sector is best handled via a sealed-bid first-price auction since it will maximize efficiency, fairness, and transparency for all parties involved.
Conclusion
In summary, auctions and other dynamic pricing schemes are helpful instruments for maximizing profits and equitably distributing the limited resources available to enterprises and organizations. Companies may optimize their earnings by strategically pricing their goods and services, which requires understanding the many auction types and pricing techniques accessible to them. However, the success of these methods will vary depending on the kind of business in which they are used. When deciding on a pricing strategy or the type of auction to use, businesses should consider the market, the competition, and the regulatory landscape. Overall, auctions and dynamic pricing have been shown to be beneficial in various sectors, and they are likely to remain an important element of company strategy for years to come, both in their current forms and future iterations.
References
Brown, C., & Liu, Y. (2019). Dynamic pricing strategies in e-commerce: A dynamic game-theoretic approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 81-91.
D’Acci, L. (2019). Platform capitalism and the governance of digital labour. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3), 175-187.
Fang, Y., & Sun, J. (2020). Price discrimination and consumer welfare: Evidence from ride-sharing. Journal of Industrial Economics, 68(1), 63-89.
Hendershott, T., & Pagano, M. (2019). Platform competition and pricing: Evidence from online advertising. Management Science, 65(9), 4189-4207.
Wang, M. (2019). Neuralink – Merging Man and Machine. YouTube. Web.
Zhu, R., & Jin, G. (2020). Optimal dynamic pricing and inventory management in online retailing. Production and Operations Management, 29(5), 1205-1222.