Teleology and Deontology in Healthcare Coursework

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

The competing trends of normative ethics of the last decades can be basically reduced to an alternative to teleology and deontology. The generally accepted paradigm of teleology is the description and explanation of human activity (D’Oca, 2021). A person must act according to their goals and be guided by their own norms, values, and ideals. Teleology supports an activity guided by one’s personal goals and filled with meaning for a particular individual. Deontology, on the contrary, does not call for achieving individual well-being but aims to maximize the amount of public utility. Deontology is more in line with my position since I believe that social relations are the substantial basis of personality, the place of residence of its essence, qualities, and properties. All the aspirations of the individual are a fundamental form of the existence of social relations as a whole. Consequently, social values and goals for achieving the common good are more significant than individual ones.

Vaccination and wearing masks are a measure of caring for the surrounding people. Each member of society should participate in forming population immunity, eliminating the pathogen, and circulating the disease in the country. Thus, even if wearing a mask causes discomfort to a person, and they are opponents of vaccination, the individual must still perform these actions for the common good. The evidence of these conclusions is that with the help of a vaccine, humanity has already managed to defeat epidemics (for example, the measles epidemic). However, the coverage of vaccinated persons should exceed 90% of the population (Ban, 2019). Therefore, for the common and personal good aimed at combating the disease, one should be vaccinated and wear masks, even if this contradicts personal beliefs.

References

Ban, M. D. (2019). The human security discourse: Balancing deontology with teleology. International Relations & European Studies, 11(12), 195-206.

D’Oca, F. R. (2021). Deontology and teleology in morality of Anselm of Canterbury. Journal of Teleological Science, 1(1), 98-116.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, June 5). Teleology and Deontology in Healthcare. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teleology-and-deontology-in-healthcare/

Work Cited

"Teleology and Deontology in Healthcare." IvyPanda, 5 June 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/teleology-and-deontology-in-healthcare/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Teleology and Deontology in Healthcare'. 5 June.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Teleology and Deontology in Healthcare." June 5, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teleology-and-deontology-in-healthcare/.

1. IvyPanda. "Teleology and Deontology in Healthcare." June 5, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teleology-and-deontology-in-healthcare/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Teleology and Deontology in Healthcare." June 5, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teleology-and-deontology-in-healthcare/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1