Tendencies in the UK and the US Economies Report (Assessment)

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Openness and Industrial Pay Inequality

The environment of the global economy requires that the states operating in it should make the best use possible of their resources, including the human ones. Similarly, the regulations in the international trade department affect the quality of the essential economic processes. As the data retrieved from the UK and the US statistics shows, the current trends in the US and the UK economies can be deemed as slightly negative (see Appendix A (The World Bank 2016)).

Particularly, the openness rates have been dropping slightly over the past few decades for the United States, whereas in the United Kingdom, the levels of openness to trade have been rather stable (see Appendix C) (Armingeon et al. 2016). The lack of progress in either state, therefore, can be viewed as troubling. Coupled with a recent increase of Industrial Pay Inequality levels in the UK and its steep rise in the US over 1985–2005, the economy trends require that immediate actions should be taken. The negative entropy of the Theil index in both states (-0.182 and -0.787 in UK and US correspondingly, see Appendix B (Galbraith 2016)) implies that, while the UK economy is comparatively safe, the US strategy needs a thorough reconsideration.

Data Analysis: What the Calculations Show

According to the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem, there is a direct correlation between the real wages and the protectionism rates in a particular country (Hillman 2013). In the case in point, protectionism incorporates the actions of the state government aimed at restricting trade. On the one hand, the concept might seem contradictory to the principles of the global economy and the importance of entering the area of the international competition.

On the other hand, the reasons for states to offer protectionism to the entrepreneurs operating in the local market are justified by the harsh competition rates on the global arena (Parmar 2013). Furthermore, the idea is tied directly to the concept of perfect competition. In light of the fact that the phenomenon is only possible in the local market environment currently, loosening the state regulations addressing the issue of foreign trade will trigger an immediate drop in employees’ wages. Apart from the possible profit loss, the subject matter is affected by the migrant labour and the associated issues.

The information represented in the graphs is a graphic proof of the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem. Indeed, the data obtained from the World Bank and UTIP shows explicitly that there has been a consistent drop in the US wages rate. The UK salaries rate is comparatively stable, yet the absence of the tendencies for the subject matter to increase shows that the globalisation process is taking its toll on the state economy (Grinols 2013).

Indeed, the Industrial Pay Inequality Rates are linked to the GDP of the states. For instance, in 1985-1990, when the UK GDP was dropping, the IPI index was comparatively low (0.015), yet, once the GDP started experiencing a gradual growth due to the integration into the global economy environment, IPI rose to 0.18-019. It could be argued, though, that the correlation is not perfectly direct in the UK case.

For instance, in 2005, when the state GDP reached an impressive mark of $13,304,180,000.00, and the openness rates equalled 56.73, the IPI rate was at its lowest (0.013). In case of the United States, however, the correlation is less explicit. The fact that the openness rates were reduced by nearly 12%, and that the wages of the employees remain comparatively the same, shows that there are minor discrepancies with the theory.

Therefore, claiming that the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem as the link between the wages and the openness of the state economy to the impact of the global market would be quite a stretch. Apart from the two variables mentioned above, an array of factors needs to be taken into account.

Reference List

Armingeon, K, Isler, C, Knopfel, L, Weisstaner, D & Engler, S 2016, Comparative political data set. Web.

Galbraith, J 2016, UTIP-UNIDO. Web.

Grinols, E 2013, Uncertainty and the theory of international trade, Taylor & Francis, New York, NY.

Hillman, A L 2013, The political economy of protection, Taylor & Francis, New York, NY.

Parmar, I 2013, Foundations of the American Century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller foundations and the rise of American power, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

The World Bank 2016, . Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, October 11). Tendencies in the UK and the US Economies. https://ivypanda.com/essays/tendencies-in-the-uk-and-the-us-economies/

Work Cited

"Tendencies in the UK and the US Economies." IvyPanda, 11 Oct. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/tendencies-in-the-uk-and-the-us-economies/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'Tendencies in the UK and the US Economies'. 11 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "Tendencies in the UK and the US Economies." October 11, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/tendencies-in-the-uk-and-the-us-economies/.

1. IvyPanda. "Tendencies in the UK and the US Economies." October 11, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/tendencies-in-the-uk-and-the-us-economies/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Tendencies in the UK and the US Economies." October 11, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/tendencies-in-the-uk-and-the-us-economies/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1