Broken windows theory is an academic thought advanced by James Wilson and George Kelling. The concept uses broken windows as an analogy for instability inside neighborhoods. Their idea connects community disorder and discourtesy to successive incidents of serious crime. Their hypothesis further says that the existence of the disorder produces anxiety in the minds of people who are persuaded that the region is insecure.
This retreat from society lowers social restraints that initially held criminals in line − the disorder results in crime, which leads to additional chaos. Researchers broadly identify two basic categories of abnormality. First is physical disorder, resulting in abandoned houses, broken windows, damaged cars, and trash-strewn vacant lots. The second category is social disorder, defined by hostile homeless folks, rowdy neighbors, and groups of youngsters crowding on the street. Broken windows theory is regarded by many as a way to change rapidly and with low investment by only changing the police crime-control tactics. It is easier to tackle disorder than to confront severe social problems such as poverty and limited education.
The broken window theory exhibits itself in our neighborhood in that our community is categorized into groups: the upper class, middle class, and lower class. I reside from a lower class family which is by far the most crime-infested region. In regards to the theory, my society has many idling crowds along the streets, derelict buildings ideal for harboring drug addicts and burglars. Arguably, the lack of social cohesion in my neighborhood has significantly led to increased disorder. The disorder has bred rampant crime in my community as compared to the middle and upper class, characterized by individuals of at least desirable social demeanor.