Darwin’s theory of evolution, while providing a new perspective on topics like natural selection, genealogy and genetics, used to be a subject of various controversies. As a matter of fact, Charles himself was aware of the outrage his beliefs would spark. His work would trigger a number of questions regarding the theological theory of evolution and lead to severe unrest in society and scientific communities.
There are two main reasons why Darwin’s ideas could be perceived as dangerous by his contemporaries: the religious and societal aspects. The two reasons merge, as the society Charles lived in relied on the belief that God created life. He acknowledged that by publishing his research, he would face ridicule and outrage, as the views presented in the book challenged the theological theory. The scientist knew that the concept of the existence of one common ancestor and the idea of natural selection was a striking contradiction to the aforementioned perspective, as it risked invalidating the role of God and religion in contemporary society. Nevertheless, Origins was published, thus, triggering a revolution in society.
Piers J. Hale’s essay, “Rejecting the Myth of the Non-Darwinian Evolution”, expands on the discussion by explaining the complications surrounding the depiction of that period and Darwinism in general. Referencing Robert J. Richards’ book, The Meaning of Evolution, he supports the belief that the concept of the “non-Darwinist revolution” is misled by ideological bias. In Hale’s opinion, said bias invalidates the many supporters of Darwin’s theory. The essay is concluded by emphasizing the need to define Darwinist and Darwinism. It may be misguided by a false category that provides a more vivid depiction of historiographic context than that of the Victorian era or the present.
Bibliography
“Evolution”: Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Directed by David Espar, Susan K. Lewis, and Alastair Reed, 2002.
Hale, Piers J. “Rejecting the Myth of the Non-Darwinian Revolution.” Victorian Review 41, no. 2 (2015): 13-18.