The Debate on Single-Source Dependencies in Logistics Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

The transportation and logistics sector is the foundation of any economy and the driving force behind all industries, including agriculture, industrial production, and services. However, like all businesses, logistics is undergoing significant change at the moment, owing to technological advancements, shifting consumer expectations, and strict regulations. The worldwide prognosis for the industry is positive, estimated at approximately US$ 4 trillion in 2018, and expected to increase to US$ 6.3 trillion by 2025 (Rao, 2021). From these statistics, the future is challenging, particularly for small and medium businesses. The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated how current logistic companies must develop new techniques to counter the challenges presented by new regulations and consumer demands. After the Brexit law was signed in December 2019, global logistics companies have to reconsider the agility of their processes. Single-source dependency, which many companies use globally, results in over-reliance on a single supplier, limiting flexibility and should be eliminated for agility and sustainability in the logistics and supply chain sector.

Single-Source Dependencies Limit the Efficiency of Logistics

From a product’s original location to its consumption stage, global logistics integrates crucial supply chain elements to ensure prompt and consistent delivery of goods from producers to consumers. Three underlying themes drive global logistics growth: expanding demand, e-commerce, and continual distribution network reconfiguration to transport products more swiftly and effectively (Venkatachalam & Narayanan, 2015). These trends are still going strong worldwide, indicating that global logistics will continue to play an essential role in the global economy. Warehousing and transport costs have played a significant role in influencing logistics strategies. To cut on warehousing needs, some companies depend on just-in-time delivery (Venkatachalam & Narayanan, 2015). While this strategy is cost-efficient, it presents serious challenges, including the risk of delivery failure. The problem is intensified by the dependence on one producer, contributing to the debate on the shift from single to multi-source dependency.

Many logistics and supply chain companies have maintained single-sourcing operations mainly because of the benefits derived from the strategy. Single-source dependency is founded on establishing trust, low costs, and quality assurance (Venkatachalam & Narayanan, 2015). As demand increases, manufacturers have to find ways of attracting more consumers through improved quality. For this reason, single-sourcing is no longer the only solution to loyalty and the quality of products. In recent years, consumer preferences have significantly changed, requiring new technological solutions and innovativeness. In this case, not every producer would be in a position to introduce new changes to their operation strategies since there are limiting factors on the production side. Therefore, single sourcing is limited in its ability to meet changing consumer needs in today’s globalized world and should be abolished.

Single-sourcing increases supply interruptions, disrupting consumers from undertaking essential activities. The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed that no matter how prepared a business is, there are some circumstances that may render it valueless. Risk mitigation is a significant element in all industries, including the logistics and supply chain sectors (Rao, 2021). In the case of unforeseen circumstances, a manufacturer may be unable to produce the products needed or have to encounter higher production costs. Sudden changes in the producers’ operations may limit suppliers from sourcing the goods from their usual suppliers. In this case, the consumer may fail to acquire the products they need in time or completely go without them. For this reason, single-sourcing should be replaced with multi-sourcing to reduce the risks of business interruptions.

As the world of logistics changes, supply chain professionals have to adjust through measures such as digitized supply chain management, which is limited by the increased interdependence between suppliers and manufacturers in single-source operations. Single-sourcing works as a binding agreement between the manufacturer and logistics personnel. As such, a change of strategy in one of the parties has far-reaching consequences (Rao, 2021). The close association and dependence on a single manufacturer have made many suppliers have to endure the losses associated with poor quality products and inconsistent supply. Since the future of logistics is digital, there is a need to cut the dependence and increase flexibility for sustainable logistics and supply chain operations.

Opposing Views

Although single-sourcing has been found insufficient to handle customer requirements in today’s globalized supply chain, some experts feel that abolishing it might not be the right strategy. Inconsistent quality has been cited as one of the challenges that might be experienced due to multi-sourcing operations (Namdar et al., 2017). Having many sources may limit the supplier’s ability to keep track of each producer’s quality, which may lead to compromised quality. In essence, product quality is undeniably the most crucial driver of success in the supply chain sector. Therefore, compromised quality arising from multi-sourcing would lead to some companies being thrown out of the market, which is a major drawback. Therefore critics argue that suppliers should find ways to handle the challenges of single-sourcing without altogether abolishing it.

Cost minimization is another major factor associated with the use of single-sourcing strategies. Getting all products from one producer has the benefit of reduced costs because the parties involved have established some level of trust. In some cases, the supplier may even get products on credit, meaning that they are assured of supply even if they encounter financial challenges. According to Namdar et al. (2017), multi-sourcing would introduce new costs that would significantly affect the supply chain efficiency. Therefore, critics of the abolishment of single-sourcing argue that the plan would lead to more losses and, therefore, not worth attempting. In response to the opposing view raised, the logistics and supply chain experts need to understand that multi-sourcing would actually encourage producers to improve on product quality to counter competition. Therefore, the proposition for the abolishment of single-sourcing techniques remains valid and the best solution to sustainability challenges in logistics.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the logistics and supply chain industry is the backbone of every country’s economy. Recently, this sector experienced challenges that prompted experts to consider ways of enhancing agility and sustainability in the supply chain operations. The single-sourcing strategy is one of the factors that has been seriously scrutinized, with experts arguing for its abolishment. Single-sourcing has rendered suppliers incapable of meeting changing customer requirements. In addition, the dependence on one producer has limited suppliers’ flexibility and reduced sustainability in the industry. Critics argue that if single-sourcing is abolished, costs would increase and contribute to low-quality products. Both of these probable challenges can be handled by increased competition resulting from multi-sourcing strategies. In essence, the future of logistics lies in flexibility and enhanced technological solutions. These factors can only be achieved if single-sourcing is replaced with multi-sourcing techniques globally.

References

Namdar, J., Li, X., Sawhney, R., & Pradhan, N. (2017). International Journal of Production Research, 56(6), 2339-2360.

Rao, A. (2021). International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 24(2), 214.

Venkatachalam, S., & Narayanan, A. (2015).. International Journal of Production Research, 54(14), 4087-4103.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, February 21). The Debate on Single-Source Dependencies in Logistics. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-debate-on-single-source-dependencies-in-logistics/

Work Cited

"The Debate on Single-Source Dependencies in Logistics." IvyPanda, 21 Feb. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/the-debate-on-single-source-dependencies-in-logistics/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'The Debate on Single-Source Dependencies in Logistics'. 21 February.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "The Debate on Single-Source Dependencies in Logistics." February 21, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-debate-on-single-source-dependencies-in-logistics/.

1. IvyPanda. "The Debate on Single-Source Dependencies in Logistics." February 21, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-debate-on-single-source-dependencies-in-logistics/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "The Debate on Single-Source Dependencies in Logistics." February 21, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-debate-on-single-source-dependencies-in-logistics/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1