The Relationship My IAT Explored
My Implicit Association Test (IAT) measured the strength of connection or association between men with careers and females with family. The test results revealed that I mostly associate with men with careers and females with families. The connection between individuals in such a setting is natural and automatic, standing at a 32% rate (Cerbara et al., 2022). The slightest connection is between males with family and females with careers recording a 1% preference (Sleek, 2018). The evaluations are similar in implicit and explicit attitudes considering that in conscious and unconscious awareness, the preference is for females with families and males with careers. The results indicate that I am socially connected with women with family and men with a career.
The Significance of the Relationship
This relationship is integral considering that it depicts the strength of culture versus person since it elaborates the association of ideas borrowed from cultural knowledge than associations within an individual. For example, I was brought up in a patriarchal society where men were the family’s sole providers, which could influence my appreciation for career men and housewives. The IAT revealed a specific type of intergroup bias which is a negative stereotype against women considering that the belief is that females should take care of the household while men focus on career development and economic stability (Cerbara et al., 2022). This result is strengthened by the fact that there is a connection between the implicit and explicit attitudes, both recording high scores where men dominate careers.
The Impact of Socialization
Socialization breaks gender stereotypes since it enhances egalitarian attitudes towards ideologies favoring sexism and gender equity. It enables one to discover different genders’ unmatched capacities and skills, which influence equalitarianism (Sleek, 2018). Socialization strengthens the understanding of the aspect of equity, which breaks negative stereotypes such as gender roles. This aspect of engagement helps prepare an individual to develop an inclusive system that respects every individual regardless of how they are labeled.
Discrimination and assumptions about a group of people have been the cause of stereotypes and prejudice. For instance, the assumption that unequal pay between men and women is normal has affected gender balance in society (Rae et al.,2018). However, socialization helps break such ideas, opening a space for inclusive engagement, and resulting in in-depth understanding. For example, I worked in a delivery company, and two of my colleagues faced a pay imbalance, considering that despite working for the same hours under strict rules, the delivery man was paid more than the lady.
My interaction with them finally shed insights into my stereotypic mind that the inequality was an infringement right after the lady told us that she was a single parent caring for all her three children by herself. Despite having no dependents or a family to care for at home, the delivery man earned almost twice as much as this lady. This interaction made me realize how outdated philosophies favoring sexism, seclusion, and discrimination hurt the country and its economy.
The IAT results can be contradicted since they are based on culture and not individual influence. My answers were influenced by socialization, which affected my perception of gender pay balance and interaction between women in the career world. Although the results depicted my initial thoughts about women and men in the corporate world, they were not absolute and could easily be changed by external influences such as socialization.
References
Cerbara, L., Ciancimino, G., & Tintori, A. (2022). Are we still a sexist society? Primary socialization and adherence to gender roles in childhood.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3408. Web.
Rae, J. R., & Olson, K. R. (2018). Test-retest reliability and predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test in children. Developmental Psychology, 54(2), 308. Web.
Sleek, S. (2018). The bias beneath two decades of measuring implicit associations.APS Observer, 31(2). Web.