Canadians are inclined to discuss the particular features of their health care system as the cause for being proud of the government’s effective policies in controlling the health of citizens.
The Canadian health care system is known world widely as Medicare. In spite of the global tendencies to provide the health care based on the privately owned insurance, Canada’s Medicare depends on the public funding, and its services are accessible for each citizen of the state without references to the status and income.
The example of the Canadian health care system accentuates the significant role of the government in financing this social sphere. The government should provide health care because only government can regulate and control such aspects of the system as the accessibility and mobility of all the services with references to the citizens’ participating in the process.
The universal accessibility to free services is guaranteed by the government because the Canadian health care system is publicly-funded and privately-provided. All Canadians have the equal access to the medical services regardless of their status, income, and state of health.
The policy’s advantages are in the fact that health care system is based on the responsibility of the provincial governments which develop specific plans for their administrative territories according to the principles worked out by the federal government. Furthermore, the overall accessibility is supported by the federal government which controls the specific categories of the population (Armstrong, Armstrong, and Fegan 75).
Mobility is the next significant aspect which is expected to be provided by the government. According to the Canada Health Act, the Canadian government accentuates the availability of free medical services for all the population in spite of the people’s moving from one province to another.
Only government can provide the possibilities to receive the free medical help during the period of changing jobs, and Canadians have the opportunities to use this chance.
The significance of this aspect is in the fact the population of many countries is rather unprotected in the situation of losing job because employers often guarantee the medical insurance, and the government develops strategies to support the health state of unemployed citizens. (Fierlbeck 28).
The Canadian government improves the state’s health care system regularly and provides the availability of all the medical services as well as accessibility of the medical services in any part of the state. Thus, the publicly-funded health care system is beneficial for patients because the government provides citizens with the possibility to use the medical services for free, but with some exceptions.
The system based on private insurance cannot provide all the citizens with all the necessary help when the system based on public funds guarantees the provision of any medical services for free (Russell and Cohn 39). The importance of the government in the process is associated with the aspects of the economic relations in the country.
To protect the citizens legally, the government should develop the principles of funding the Canadian health care system with references to the citizens’ role in the process. The Canadian government resolves the problem using taxation as the main resource of financing the sphere.
Moreover, all the questions connected with financing the system are discussed with the official public representatives who prepare reports for the population (Fierlbeck 65). In spite of the fact the role of the government in providing the health care is leading, the citizens’ control is realized with the help of official representatives.
If people in different countries are asked to imagine the ideal health care system, many would concentrate on the example of Canada. The reasons for this fact are simple. People need to be provided with free access to all the medical services at any place.
Moreover, focusing on the example of Canada, the respondents will be right because the Canadian government not only provides the availability of the services but also support the people’s healthy lifestyle, and this fact is even more important for citizens.
Works Cited
Armstrong, Pat, Hugh Armstrong, and Claudia Fegan. Universal Health Care: What the United States Can Learn from the Canadian Experience. USA: The New Press, 1999. Print.
Fierlbeck, Katherine. Health Care in Canada: A Citizen’s Guide to Policy and Politics. Canada: University of Toronto Press, 2011. Print.
Russell, Jesse, and Ronald Cohn. Health Care in Canada. UK: Book on Demand Ltd., 2012. Print.