Agriculture seriously depends on the ability of specialists to differentiate among genotypes and promote plant diversity. Therefore, the main objective of DNA fingerprinting in agriculture is to overcome the limitation of insufficient dissimilarity among prior genotypes and come up with the best ideas to discover new molecular markers and collect data differently (Piggott et al., 2015). The introduction of DNA markers made it possible for agriculture specialists to develop novel chemical reactions and significantly pushed the plant science forward. Some of the most important areas where DNA fingerprinting is used for agricultural science are hybridisation, gene flow, and mating systems (Evans et al., 2019). The advent of this innovation made it possible to analyse plants from remote areas and run specific sampling procedures that could help isolate the biggest issues and make it easier to respond to genotype problems.
Currently, DNA fingerprinting is directly associated with chemical fertilizers and hormones that assist in the fight against an abusive usage of pesticides. Therefore, DNA markers protect soil from pollution and make it easier for agriculture experts to stop the current decline in the quality of agrarian products (Wossen et al., 2019). The growing demand puts a serious strain on molecular biology because scientists have to invest more time and money in research projects that focus on genetic background or additional DNA techniques. Possible crop improvements and cultivar identification may only be possible under the condition where DNA fingerprinting is in place (Coyotzi et al., 2017). Agriculture experts, on the other hand, should ensure that chromosome engineering and crop germplasm may bring significant benefits to the area.
Overall, DNA fingerprinting is the best way to improve biosafety and maintain decent crop quality. In the face of numerous challenges linked to food shortage and population upsurge, it may be safe to say that DNA-based technologies are essential for the national economy because they help researchers establish better solutions for modern problems that might require additional expenditures. Even if it is going to cost more to investigate the potential technological capabilities of DNA-based agricultural techniques, agrarians should pay more attention to the pioneering methods in DNA plant engineering to create a much more efficient environment for plant cultivation. In the future, the agrarian community may be able to witness non-model plant species being genotyped-by-sequencing (Kosmowski et al., 2019). The cost-effectiveness of the proposed methods may also be expected to increase, as experts will have the opportunity to obtain full genomic sequence data and complete preventive analyses of risky situations based on massive data sets spawned by next-generation sequencing technologies.
Reference List
Coyotzi, S. et al. 2017 ‘Agricultural soil denitrifiers possess extensive nitrite reductase gene diversity’, Environmental Microbiology, 19(3), pp. 1189-1208.
Evans, A. E. et al. 2019 ‘Agricultural water pollution: key knowledge gaps and research needs’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 36, 20-27.
Kosmowski, F. et al. 2019 ‘Varietal identification in household surveys: results from three household-based methods against the benchmark of DNA fingerprinting in southern Ethiopia’, Experimental Agriculture, 55(3), pp. 371-385.
Piggott, J. J. et al. (2015) ‘Climate warming and agricultural stressors interact to determine stream periphyton community composition’, Global Change Biology, 21(1), pp. 206-222.
Wossen, T. et al. 2019 ‘Poverty reduction effects of agricultural technology adoption: the case of improved cassava varieties in Nigeria’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(2), pp. 392-407.