Source Location
The paper reviews the tendencies of matrimonial and reproduction life in Norway in the 19th century. The research study is based on the academic peer-reviewed article that analyzes marriage in the country in the 1800s.
Reliability of the Article
The source was located through the usage of Google Scholar as a search engine. The article is reliable since it operates the original Norwegian state reports (Roskaft, Wara, and Viken 443).
Three Marriage Aspects
Aspect 1
The first issue demonstrates how the political and cultural situation in the country-influenced demographic rates. Mainly, the authors of the work argue that there was a one-child decrease in every Norwegian family at the time of Swedish encroachment.
Aspect 2
It is concluded that the 19th-century society tended to improve the social positioning of the country by marrying low-status girls to wealthy men.
Aspect 3
Finally, the article provides a unique discovery, due to which the quality of marriage life in Norway was deeply dependent on the age of women, who were getting married.
Questionable Issue
In his dramas, Henrik Ibsen makes a strong accent on the willful and motivated women, who strive for knowledge and education. Unfortunately, the academic article does not provide the statistics on the level of Norwegian female education. Thus, the questionable issue is still researched and analyzed by experts and historians.
“A Doll House” Production Implications
The research study asserts the theory and provides some explanation for the matrimony aspect of Norway. The information can be used while preparing the performance in “A Doll House” since it serves as a guideline for Nora’s position in her family. Specifically, the actor has to adopt the conduct of a firm and determined woman who suffers from no social status inequality effects.
Work Cited
Roskaft, Eivin, Annelise Wara, and Aslaug Viken. “Reproductive Success in Relation to Resource-Access and Parental Age in a Small Norwegian Farming Parish during the Period 1700-1900.” Ethology and Sociobiology 13.5 (1992): 443-461. Print.