Updated:

The Moral Dilemma: Nephrologist’s Choices Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

A moral dilemma is a difficult situation where a person has to choose between two alternatives, all of which contribute to the transgression of a moral principle. The decision during a dilemma involves a conflict between two duties, such as loyalty to self or allegiance to society (Papouli, 2019). It is paramount to note that any decision taken may have a negative outcome, and Aristotle’s golden mean is an antidote to solving the challenge.

Example of a Moral Dilemma

A newly employed nephrologist is transferred to a city-based healthcare facility. The nephrologist observes an increasing number of hospital readmissions, and the people readmitted suffer kidney problems. After investigating the patient’s history, he discovers that the patients are admitted for minor surgeries during which radical nephrectomy is performed for organ trafficking. He finds out that the hospital works closely with a criminal syndicate trafficking human organs. When the top management at the hospital realizes that he has found out, they summon him and ask him to join them in performing the heinous acts, otherwise, he will lose his job.

Nephrologist’s Choices on the Moral Dilemma

When the nephrologist discovered the moral decadence in the hospital, he had only two choices, either join them in perpetuating organ trafficking or reject the offer and lose his job. The doctor applied Aristotle’s golden mean in the scenario by selecting a choice that favors more people (Rachels & Rachels, 2012). The essential virtue in the situation is the courage to face the rogue hospital managers. Deciding to join forces is likely to jeopardize the lives of many unsuspecting patients. The decision will further be propagated by cowardice as he may fear what the managers may do to him once he quits the job with their secret. Courage is a virtue that gives a person a choice to confront fear or uncertainty to solve evade crime (Rachels & Rachels, 2012). He expressed the virtue by overcoming the qualms caused by joblessness and quit his job for the patient’s safety and avoiding crime. Quitting the job is best because it serves the community’s interests and saves many lives. Accepting the offer would have helped him to maintain his job, but he sacrificed his job for the sake of society.

References

Papouli, E. (2019). . European Journal of Social Work, 22(6), 921–934. Web.

Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2012). . McGraw Hill. [PDF document]. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2024, April 3). The Moral Dilemma: Nephrologist's Choices. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-moral-dilemma-nephrologists-choices/

Work Cited

"The Moral Dilemma: Nephrologist's Choices." IvyPanda, 3 Apr. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/the-moral-dilemma-nephrologists-choices/.

References

IvyPanda. (2024) 'The Moral Dilemma: Nephrologist's Choices'. 3 April.

References

IvyPanda. 2024. "The Moral Dilemma: Nephrologist's Choices." April 3, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-moral-dilemma-nephrologists-choices/.

1. IvyPanda. "The Moral Dilemma: Nephrologist's Choices." April 3, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-moral-dilemma-nephrologists-choices/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "The Moral Dilemma: Nephrologist's Choices." April 3, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-moral-dilemma-nephrologists-choices/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1