The Practice Project focuses on the dimension of online recruitment and relies on three measurable objectives that were formulated according to Bloom’s taxonomy and provided previously. Taking this into account, it seems reasonable to appeal to a goal-based evaluation within the scope of the project assessment. The essence of the mentioned method measures whether the goals of my Practice Project will be achieved. Such a choice is founded on the fact that the given objectives are specific and exhaustive and can be evaluated relying on particular points of the research.
The goal-based method seems to be related to the chosen methodology. Each strategy is related to a certain objective on which goal-based assessment is focused. For instance, a literature search strategy would be applicable to the first and second learning objectives (DePoy & Gitlin, 2019). Consulting with an expert or a body of experts is a source of data for predicting future developments. Interviews and questionnaires could be used for all three objectives, providing information from stakeholders and informing the information found in the review of the literature (Mishra & Alok, 2022). Hence, there is a clear correlation between the goal-based method and the outlined strategies.
The chosen method implies that the project’s success will be determined by the extent to which the objectives will be achieved. To that end, there will be three dimensions that will determine this success – the validity, reliability, and generalizability of findings. Accordingly, information gathered for each of the objectives will be assessed through the following aspects (Delios et al., 2022). First, it is to which degree the project’s strategies measure what they intend to measure. Second, it is the overall consistency of these measures (whether repeated inquiries produce similar results. Third, it is to which extent the findings can be applied in other settings.
Thus, the types of evaluation that will be undertaken are the assessment of the correspondence with the academic field (validity), repeated interviews (reliability), and conducting interviews in different settings (generalizability). Such an approach may imply an exact extent of subjectivity, but it also provides flexibility in terms of the evaluation process. The gathered information within the scope of this evaluation will determine the directions for future research and how, where, and when online recruitment is the most effective.
References
Mishra, S. B., & Alok, S. (2022). Handbook of research methodology. Elsevier.
Delios, A., Clemente, E. G., & Wu, T. (2022). Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. Psychological and Cognitive Science, 119(30). Web.
DePoy, E., & Gitlin, L. N. (2019). Introduction to research E-book: Understanding and applying multiple strategies. Elsevier Health Sciences. Web.