Introduction
The question regarding the right to health care relates to many spheres of human life, like politics, law, and ethics. The moral side of the question is one of the most important, as many debates are taking place today, and a standard solution is still not found. Consequently, it is essential to look at the justice and beneficence of the issues and define the autonomy that affects the most common thoughts in societies. The right to health is a beneficial part of societal structure, and even though some issues appear, changes should be considered.
The Right to Health in the United States
The issues related to healthcare provision in the United States are increasing due to the high costs that burden individuals. Accessible healthcare should prevent suffering and protect lives (Nunez et al., 2021). Consequently, the prices of services should be reduced. Taxpayers may become concerned about the rising percentages and inefficient treatment. Therefore, the counterargument becomes visible and concerning in families and communities. Universal healthcare can reduce costs and address issues related to ethics and justice so every citizen can stay equal.
Everyone should understand that their well-being is valued, and the healthcare system should promote public welfare. The quality of life can also be boosted when patients have immediate access to medical care and assistance from professionals (Showalter, 2020a). Therefore, the level of productivity can increase, making global achievements more progressive. It is not only about the service provision but also about the development of positive well-being in the nation. Consequently, the right to health care should not be neglected and should be developed in the United States.
Patient autonomy should be protected as it is one of the main ethical aspects. Legal rules provide a deep understanding of informed decision-making and the right to stay aware of the financial part of services (Showalter, 2020b). Every human brings unique value to the world, and every individual should be confident about it. Therefore, the dignity is acknowledged, and the socioeconomic status is always considered. With the development of the right to health care, people may know that their thoughts and decisions are valued, a sense of self-respect can be improved, and the level of structure might increase.
Causing harm is one of the most abnormal actions of people, and it is essential to follow the principle of non-maleficence. Harming can include the denial of providing support to the person who is a part of a lower social class. In this case, equality plays a massive role, and ensuring that medical support is available for everyone is crucial. More severe illnesses can be developed and transmitted if those who cannot afford to not ask for help. Unnecessary suffering can also appear, causing a general decrease in national well-being. Consequently, progress can only be achieved when patients are happy with the support provided by medical professionals.
By making healthcare open to every person, the responsibility towards each other may become less efficient. This problem may occur as some people pay increased taxes when others do not pay anything (Galvani et al., 2020). The middle class might experience financial unfairness in making healthcare available to every citizen. However, the ethical aspect can also be raised in this question, as access to medical services can promote productivity and improve the generation of the economy.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the development and introduction of the right to health care is one of the main factors that can improve society and increase general well-being. Societies that adhere to ethical rules can build more fulfilled and happy lives. Nevertheless, legal obligations should be followed, and individuals should protect their right to free decision-making. In this case, dignity can also be secured, and developmental progress can be boosted.
References
Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., & Foster, E. M. (2020). Improving the prognosis of health care in the USA. Health Policy, 395(10223), 524-533. Web.
Nunez, A., Sreeganga, S. D., Ramaprasad, A. (2021). Access to healthcare during COVID-19. IJERPH, 18(6). Web.
Showalter, J. S. (2020b). A brief history of law and medicine. In The Law of Healthcare Administration (9th Ed.). Chicago: Health Administration Press.
Showalter, J. S. (2020a). Access to healthcare: Rights and responsibilities. In The Law of Healthcare Administration (9th Ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.