The Shelly v. Kraemer Case Decision Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

The American Supreme Court considered the case Shelly v. Kraemer, the essence of which was that the Shelly family acquired real estate in St. Louis, Missouri. The Shelly family was African American and did not know that a restrictive agreement was in effect for the purchase of the real estate in the area. This agreement was based on the fact that people of the Negro and Mongolian races did not have the right to acquire any property in a particular area. In this regard, Louis Kremer sued Shelley to prevent them from getting the property into ownership. The court’s decision was that the agreement should take place and should enter into force.

The court’s decision is striking that despite the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that people should not be deprived of any rights because of skin color, race, etc., it was decided that the agreement should be applied. According to the court’s decision, the agreement prohibiting Shelley from acquiring real estate in St. Louis does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. In this case, the case is based on a concluded private contract, which is not subject to any amendments. Nevertheless, the obstacle to acquiring real estate for people of a different race from the majority is unfair and racist. All people should have the right to purchase property, which is entirely consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment and excludes any elements of any additional agreements.

After reading the court’s decision, one of the most pressing questions is how black people can achieve equal treatment for themselves, even if states do not stand up for them. The problem is that despite all the laws and amendments, African Americans continue to experience racial harassment from the racial majority as well as the State on whose behalf the courts act. There are various ways to circumvent, for example, amendments to the constitution, which eliminate the chances of eradicating racism. In this case and a number of other similar cases, the court’s decision was based not on official documents but on private agreements. Such situations contribute to the growth of racism and violate people’s rights to equal treatment and opportunities.

The court ruled that the owners of the district must enforce the agreement against the Shelley family. The agreement was not signed by all residents of the neighborhood, yet the majority signed it. Although the Shelley family should have been protected by the Fourteenth Amendment on equal protection, the agreement prevails over this amendment. The Shelleys were not aware of this agreement, and yet they are not allowed to live in this area of the state by order of the Supreme Court of Missouri.

In conclusion, in the case Shelly v. Kraemer, which was considered in the Supreme Court of the United States, the result was the recognition of the validity of the frequent agreement that African Americans do not have the right to acquire real estate. Although the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution excludes discrimination based on race and skin color, yet in this case, the agreement became the primary document in the case. Because even the State supports private agreements and not a State official document, the eradication of racism cannot take place. Injustice towards black people continues to grow and concerns such essential and integral parts of life as the right to purchase housing.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2024, February 9). The Shelly v. Kraemer Case Decision. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-shelly-v-kraemer-case-decision/

Work Cited

"The Shelly v. Kraemer Case Decision." IvyPanda, 9 Feb. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/the-shelly-v-kraemer-case-decision/.

References

IvyPanda. (2024) 'The Shelly v. Kraemer Case Decision'. 9 February.

References

IvyPanda. 2024. "The Shelly v. Kraemer Case Decision." February 9, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-shelly-v-kraemer-case-decision/.

1. IvyPanda. "The Shelly v. Kraemer Case Decision." February 9, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-shelly-v-kraemer-case-decision/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "The Shelly v. Kraemer Case Decision." February 9, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-shelly-v-kraemer-case-decision/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1