The article’s main focus is on the struggles of immigrants working as day laborers experience and how this affects their ability to support their families. The problems experienced by the immigrants, such as their characterization as illegals, affect their ability to be present for their families (Cleaveland, 2010). The impact of these issues on the immigrants is disadvantaging them and making them more vulnerable. Classifying immigrant families as “illegals” makes it difficult to address their needs and develop empathy toward them effectively.
Primary ideas explored in the research include the characterization of the immigrants as illegal aliens, which leads to the perception they are criminals. The depiction of the immigrant families as “unlawful” makes it difficult for social workers to overcome the tag and understand their circumstances (Cleaveland, 2010). For instance, the population categorized as illegitimate members of society is likely to receive little or no empathy from social workers and government officials.
The effective delivery of services to the population is dependent on numerous aspects. For instance, it is influenced by the perceptions held by those offering services, such as social workers, whose beliefs affect their interaction with the immigrant families will be influenced by their beliefs (Cleaveland, 2010). Social workers’ ability to understand cultural differences and avoid stereotypes is bound to ensure they effectively engage and serve immigrant families.
Government workers are expected to develop strategies to effectively serve all community members at their disposal. Social workers have to competently serve the population without disadvantaging or discriminating against a given group by treating them unfairly because of their status or ancestry (Cleaveland, 2010). The research findings establish the development of culturally competent practice paves the way for the social workers to engage all citizens without prejudices.
The article’s main focus is on the impact environment plays in shaping the lives of children. The study examines how environmental qualities, such as poverty, impact children’s growth and development and the choices they make (Evans, 2004). Social workers and other individuals engaged in managing children’s cases need to understand how a lack of social support, violence, and family turmoil hurt children’s development and progress.
The research’s primary ideas include the knowledge that poverty has a significant impact on the experience and actions of individuals. For example, in children, it influences how they respond to figures of authority, considering parents from low-income families are less responsive to their kids’ needs (Evans, 2004). Children who grow up in low-income and poor homes are probably exposed to more violence and disruptions than those in middle-income backgrounds.
The researcher posits that children from poor backgrounds are likely to be affected by family turmoil, such as absent parents, affecting their growth and self-esteem. The argument brings to the limelight the impact institutional care has on low-income families and children (Evans, 2004). The knowledge disruption in kids’ lives is set to cause problems and raises questions on how social and administrative factors contribute to disadvantaging poor children.
The gap between the wealthy and the poor is continually growing. The growth in income inequalities will impact society’s quality of life, with children from impoverished backgrounds suffering the brunt of this development (Evans, 2004). The poor will experience more family separations and violence, which will affect their social progress. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how poverty affects kids’ development and growth, considering it can influence their socialization and parental care.
The goal of the research is to demonstrate the various factors, such as criminal justice initiatives, social work, and legal proceedings can address domestic violence within a given community. The review of the criminal justice initiative aimed at addressing domestic violence offenders and their rehabilitation enables evaluation of their effectiveness (Danis, 2003). The research helps establish the need for social workers to understand various domestic abuse interventions, which they can use to address cases brought to them.
The study examines several ideas, such as the realization that there is no single domestic violence intervention, which can effectively mitigate the problem. For instance, social workers need to understand various domestic violence management initiatives, considering they can leverage these models to solve the cases brought to them (Danis, 2003). The criminal justice responses need to be supported by coordinated community interventions since this will allow for better results.
The statement that men arrested for domestic violence tends to be ineffective in the long term is confusing. Criminal justice interventions in domestic abuse cases have a positive impact and are likely to deter offenders and set precedence to prevent similar incidences (Danis, 2003). For instance, the issuance of arrest orders and prosecution of the batterers is meant to ensure community members understand they are liable for their actions and will not escape justice.
The article is relevant today since it allows one to understand the connection between criminal justice and community responses in domestic violence cases. The knowledge of these initiatives is essential since there is a need for a multipronged approach to address the problem (Danis, 2003). The use of one approach, such as criminal justice intervention, is bound to limit the involvement of community-based responses in addressing the menace.
References
Cleaveland, C. (2010). “We are not criminals”: Social work advocacy and unauthorized migrants. Social Work, 55(1), 74-81.
Danis, F. S. (2003). The criminalization of domestic violence: What social workers need to know. Social Work, 48(2), 237-246.
Evans, G. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59(2), 77.