Introduction
Theory of mind (TOM) refers to the cognitive ability to understand one’s mental status and that of others. ‘Mental states’ refers to beliefs, desires, and feelings. The word ‘theory’ is used because mental states are not observable; thus, knowledge of them is theoretical. Some of the mental states one considers are beliefs, desires, emotions, intents, and knowledge.
TOM forms one of the basic elements of social interactions in kids. Having a TOM helps people realize and understand that others have unique beliefs and desires that differ from their own, allowing them to engage in daily social interactions. TOM is believed to be a universal ability, and research has been conducted to identify its development. Different methods, such as the False Belief Task test, have been employed in various cultures to investigate TOM development.
Developing TOM at an early age enables one to grow with knowledge and the ability to predict, interpret, and influence the behaviors of others. According to Wellman and Liu (2004), five key components of TOM develop sequentially in almost all kids between the ages of three and five. These concepts encompass diverse desires, beliefs, access to knowledge, false beliefs, and hidden emotions.
The False Belief Task and Its Relation to Theory of Mind Development
The False Belief Task is a task in TOM development where children must conclude that another person does not possess the knowledge they have. Guessing what a person believes in this task is used to measure the development of TOM. If children successfully assume what they know, they are considered to have passed the task. This is because the prediction depends on correctly inferring that person’s false belief; the task empirically shows TOM ability (Baron-Cohen et al., 1985). FBT is important as it gives more knowledge on how one grows and how kids develop TOM. Additionally, scientists use TOM to predict and explain behavior in children.
TOM research is essential, as it can help identify a child’s primary source of influence at any given time. It also explains how one develops and changes over time and how these changes affect one’s development. TOM research also helps determine whether people, especially children, develop the same theory of development regardless of their culture or region.
Three main tasks are employed in the FBT test: the unexpected transfer task, the deceptive box task, and the appearance-reality task. In an unexpected transfer task test, an object is moved from where the child left it and placed somewhere else. For example, a scenario where two kids, Mary and Martha, are playing with a marble can be used as an unexpected transfer task. Mary moved the marble from the countertop where Martha had left it and put it in a cabinet. Martha will look for the marble where she left it, as that is what is expected.
In this situation, Mary will be asked what is expected of Martha. If she recognizes that the other person will act according to her false beliefs, then she can reasonably be sure she can attribute beliefs to the other. This indicates that typically developing children can typically pass the unexpected transfer task, a so-called first-order belief attribution task, by the age of four.
Unlike unexpected transfer tasks, the deceptive box task involves showing kids Smarties tubes containing pencils rather than Smarties. Children are then asked what another child, who has not seen inside the Smarties tube, will think is inside(Hughes, 1998). In the appearance-reality task, children are shown a cutout of a white bird, which is then covered by a blue filter, and they are asked what color the bird is in reality and what color it appears to be when viewed through the filter (Flavell, 1986). The bird’s color is white, but it appears blue through the filter. According to Flavell (1986), this is done to help children understand that the same stimulus can be mentally represented in two contradictory ways.
Results from False Belief Task Studies from Across the World
Studies using the False Belief Task worldwide have consistently revealed patterns in the development of a Theory of Mind (TOM). According to Callaghan et al. (2005, when a standardized procedure or method is used in five different cultures, there is synchrony in the onset of mental reasoning, with many children crossing the false-belief milestone at approximately five years of age. However, desynchronization occurs if different methods are used in other cultures, and the cross-cultural tests produce different results. Cross-cultural results on the FBT prove that TOM is universally developed. They also demonstrate a universal ability for false-belief reasoning, particularly in children, regardless of the culture from which they come.
Conducting FBT in different countries yields similar results, provided the same method is used. This occurs because TOM in children develops between the ages of four and seven (Barret et al., 2013). Therefore, children in this age group, regardless of their country of origin, will demonstrate an understanding of what is happening. This matters because it provides insight into how children develop TOM and whether there are factors that influence its development. Wellman and Liu (2004) also believe that kids at this age shift from a situation-based to a representation-based understanding of behavior since their TOM have begun to develop. Once the results are interpreted, they are an essential indicator of understanding children’s mental state.
False belief tasks are consistent across all cultures and form the primary and most straightforward building blocks to investigate TOM. This means that despite living in different areas, children tested for TOM will relay the same understanding of beliefs. This applies to Western, Educated, Industrialized, Religious, Democratic (WEIRD) and non-WEIRD societies.
Researchers have often used WEIRD communities to conduct FBT tests and research on the development of TOM. These societies have individuals who are more independent and analytic, concerned with fairness, existentially anxious, and less conforming and attentive to context compared to those from non-WEIRD societies. According to Liu et al. (2008), cultural differences are evident across various traits, including values, personality traits, visual perception, and spatial reasoning. However, the meta-analysis of sampling kids from China and North America showed parallel development trajectories. This supports the FBT task results, indicating that there are fundamental similarities in the ToM mechanism, which makes it clear that WEIRD and non-WEIRD societies share the same ToM development.
Criticisms
False-belief tasks have received numerous criticisms regarding their suitability for measuring the theory of development. Bloom and German (2000) believe there are two main reasons why this method is inappropriate for this study. The first reason was that passing the false belief task requires abilities beyond those of the TOM. Therefore, a kid could have used other cognitive skills to pass the test.
The second reason for not using this method was that the TOM does not require the ability to reason about false beliefs. This may occur in cases where the child is not aware of their mental state during the task. Bloom and German (2000) believe this is a limitation since children with autism fail the false belief task because they lack the capacity to acquire a TOM. This makes it unfair for children with different abilities, as it is limited to those who can acquire the ability to use TOM.
Another criticism was that the number of samples used, in this case, children, was small and may not represent the whole population. Nielsen et al. (2017) argue that bias occurs when the tasks are conducted. The research lacks diversification and focuses solely on Western, educated, industrialized, prosperous, and democratic societies, rendering it unrepresentative of the rest of the world.
False-belief tasks form one small aspect of TOM, making it appropriate to use with children only. Therefore, there is no research on whether adult TOM is consistent across cultures. Since adults have fully developed, understand their culture perfectly, and have their own way of thinking, their TOM may vary across cultures. Current research suggests that TOM deficits are present in various clinical populations. According to Croker (2012), practitioners and researchers who want to use the FBT test should inform themselves about criticisms of the theory and how this might influence the interpretation of the results attained. More complex false-belief tasks may be required to complete and compile standardized results.
Another criticism is the biased nature of the results obtained from the tests. The results are also biased, and more must be done to assimilate all cultures into the tasks fully. Overreliance on research subjects from the US and other Western nations can produce false claims about human psychology and behavior because their psychological tendencies are highly unusual compared to the global population. Future research should use a more comprehensive operational definition of culture and attempt to measure how assimilated participants are to Western culture. Familiarity with the culture should also be considered since many of these tasks were first used in the Western region and have not changed with time or region.
Conclusion
In conclusion, TOM is essential as it allows people to attribute intentions and thoughts to others and also to understand the role of a person’s mental state in explaining their intentions and overall behavior. TOM helps one explain their behavior and perceive possible intentions from others. Studies to investigate TOM across cultures have used false-belief tasks.
The results obtained in the false belief task are similar, as culture does not affect a person’s TOM development. This means the results obtained from the WEIRD countries are similar to those in other cultures and regions. It is, therefore, clear that TOM development occurs across all cultures. Development of TOM depends on the child’s reasoning ability and the ability to relate their beliefs to their surroundings.
References
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?Cognition, 21(1), 37-46.
Barrett, H. C., Broesch, T., Scott, R. M., He, Z., Baillargeon, R., Wu, D., Bolz, M., Henrich, J., Setoh, P., Wang, J., & Laurence, S. (2013). Early false-belief understanding in traditional non-Western societies. Proceedings. Biological sciences, 280(1755), 20122654.
Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77(1), B25-B31.
Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M. L., Odden, H., Itakura, S., Tapanya, S., & Singh, S. (2005). Synchrony in the onset of mental-state reasoning: evidence from five cultures. Psychological science, 16(5), 378–384.
Croker, S. (2012). The development of cognition. Cengage Learning.
Flavell, J. H. (1986). The development of children’s knowledge about the appearance–reality distinction. American Psychologist, 41(4), 418.
Hughes, C. (1998). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(2), 233-253.
Liu, D., Wellman, H. M., Tardif, T., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2008). Theory of mind development in Chinese children: A meta-analysis of false-belief understanding across cultures and languages. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 523.
Nielsen, M., Haun, D., Kärtner, J., & Legare, C. H. (2017). The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31-38.
Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory‐of‐mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523-541.