This paper examines the history of Toys “R” Us from when it was founded to when it was declared insolvent. Toys “R” Us was an organization founded in the late 1940s; it started manufacturing cribs, strollers, and highchairs for newborns. Originally, the shop was a baby-focused furnishings store. However, in 1957 the organization was rebranded as Toys “R” Us Inc. (Rosenwald, 2017). In the mid-1950s, the founder adopted a supermarket approach to his toy business, expanding it bigger than its rivals and stocking it with tens of thousands of toys. Even though Toys “R” Us was regarded as every child’s fantasy, the organization was compelled to declare bankruptcy in 2017, liquidating hundreds of its stores (Mackay, 2017). The organization was subjected to chapter 11 bankruptcy legislation, which refers to a law where a company proposes a restructuring proposal to keep the firm operating and pay lenders over time (Morgan & Nasir, 2021). This bankruptcy was caused by the company’s inability to keep up with shifting customer behavior and kid play patterns.
In this regard, management is not a simple objective as people deem it. Thence, companies cannot wait for good fortune; rather, they should be flexible in incorporating innovations. In this sense, these businesses worry about imprudent borrowing that subsequently has long-term effects. Hence, catastrophe is inevitable when such factors are combined with the fragile, uncertain, intricate, and unclear future created by advanced technology. To combat this scenario, every employee, from the top, must work hard to succeed. To be precise, Toys “R” Us should have followed market trends and adequately studied its target. Given that kids no longer play with toys, the company should have emphasized an internet presence. Toys “R” Us also upgraded its e-commerce to respond to the shifting market. Moreover, the firm should have gone worldwide by developing partnerships, companies with diminishing sales or profits diversify. As an effect, helping them stay relevant in the face of digital change and innovation and embrace the future.
Background
In 1948, Charles Lazarus founded Toys “R” Us as a children’s furnishing company. He used investments from savings and bank loans. In 1957, the organization founded its first formal toy shop, completely devoted to children’s toys, and became public in 1978. According to Lewis (2017), the firm had several conventional toy stores, shops focusing on baby commodities, over 100 children’s apparel stores, and various educational specialist stores. Nonetheless, the firm owned numerous toy shops in other international countries, led by Asian vendors (Li et al., 2022). Toys “R” Us offered its items online via toysrus.com and other platforms, with online retailing performed through a partnership with Amazon. Inc. In 1982, the company expanded its product line by adding the Kids “R” Us and Babies “R” Us labels, bearing copyrights. These brands enjoyed tremendous development and became one of the most frequented sites for toys and children’s clothes. The company experienced robust achievements during its inception stages, and the organization’s adoption of various success drivers attributed to this.
In particular, Lazarus’ pricing strategy radically differed from his competitors: he offered the most-desired things for minimal or no profit. Shoppers thought that the remainder of the store’s merchandise was also affordably priced and continued their shopping there. Furthermore, Toys “R” Us created a new segment to offer name-brand children’s clothing at reduced costs to compete with new market entrants. The corporation opened two prototype Kids “R” Us locations in the city of New York that were aesthetically pleasing and satisfied buyers. Concurrently, other extravagantly designed branches contained electronic games and well-named divisions. Kids “R” Us successfully replicated some of Toys “R” Us’s strategies, including bargain pricing, strict inventory control, bulk buying, and building outlets in reduced-rent strip malls along main roads. In 1983, the company’s revenues topped $1 billion, reaching $1.3 billion (Stowell & Raino, 2017). Hence, becoming one of the top performing organizations at that time.
Consequently, Toys “R” Us and Montgomery Ward launched a collaborative partnership in 1986 for Gaithersburg, where they would run separately yet exchange a sign. Toys “R” Us had a sense of humor about itself and the business. Notably, the company’s success was due to its buying power, enormous variety, large stockpiles, and ability to identify high-selling items swiftly; therefore, fiscal sales surpassed the previous year by nearly double figures. In 1989, Toys “R” Us initiated Geoffrey’s Fun Club, a non-profit party that bolstered operations. It submitted semi-annual packages with merchandise like an action booklet with a household individual’s name with a child as the central protagonist. Toys “R” Us merged with McDonald’s Corporation (Japan) to start multiple toy stores in the country.
Analysis and Discussion
Finance
Sponsors bought Toys “R” Us throughout the years, allowing the company to expand into other areas. At the same time, it posed a financial depletion that eventually led to the company’s demise in 2017. According to Morgan & Nasir (2021), Toys-R-Us filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2017 in an effort to consolidate $5 billion in long-term debt. However, it was too late to restructure the organization from bankruptcy protection as Toys “R” Us could not apply innovative ways to enhance consumer traffic around the country.
Cultural
The social culture inhibited Toys “R” Us operations, and businesses ought to have scrutinized the Saudi Arabian way of life. Islam teachings and beliefs impact people’s purchases and choices. Before selling its items, Toys “R” Us should have studied market teachings and practices. For example, the Saudi Arabian government warned its citizens to avoid Barbie dolls that disseminate western culture and violate Islamic precepts. Such a decision may have far-reaching repercussions for Toys “R” Us, especially if it does not make Saudi Arabian-suited toys.
Social Factors
Toys “R” Us witnessed a major income drop throughout the years. This was mostly due to the company’s inability to adapt its methods to shifting customer preferences about their favorite web portals. In particular, the firm’s negligence towards adopting the e-commerce boom, hence their clients. Additionally, the corporation did not examine the consumer happiness measurements. As a result of the company’s decision to eliminate cleaning services, dust accumulated on the floors of its shops, which were not adequately maintained. As part of its cost-cutting initiatives, Toys “R” Us further dismissed knowledgeable employees, a risky move intended to ensure the company’s market viability. The company’s string of actions resulted in an overall decline in consumer satisfaction, which negatively impacted the number of loyal customers.
Economic
At the height of Toys “R” Us’s operations, inept and unscrupulous employees embezzled funds; thus, the company’s profits were inadequate to pay off its outstanding obligations. The inability of the investment managers to thoroughly examine and manage risks associated with funded status risk, market risk, interest rate risk, operational risk, and liquidity risk while managing the company’s plan assets exacerbated the organization’s financial restrictions. Toys “R” Us could not address cash flow management and asset class diversification; hence, they failed to diversify their investment plan.
Environmental
Toys “R” Us support social causes; they appreciate the necessity of operating sustainably and positively impacting society. Over the previous three decades, the corporation has donated million in goods to children’s organizations (Murnen, 2018). Toys “R” Us Children’s Fund gave more billions to child safety. The corporation encouraged workers to be philanthropic by matching their donations to qualifying charities. Toys “R” Us had a well-established system for arranging volunteer matches, a program that identifies organizations that need aid.
Legal-regulatory
The corporation had considerable legal challenges, which finally halted its operations. In 2017, the company filed for bankruptcy, and it was disclosed that the attorneys and bankruptcy advisors were paid $56 million in fees. The company’s lenders agreed that the Toys “R” Us business had to be seized since it accumulated losses. The fact that the firm’s workers did not get severance pay from the corporation indicates that they were forgotten throughout the bankruptcy process. The whole debacle badly impacted the company’s brand image, which had taken decades to create.
Political
Toys “R” Us had several outlets licensed in over fifty countries. Nevertheless, the entity was well-known throughout North America, Europe, and Asia. The firm leads in toy and infant goods retail. They concentrate on scalability, reduced regional footprint, and strong vendor relationships to gain a market-leading position (Morgan & Nasir, 2021). Due to China’s great development potential, the firm built its first licensed outlet there. However, on the verge of collapsing, the government could not afford them with loans and reduced taxes, causing its downfall as their rivals usurped their market niche.
Technological
Toys “R” Us could not successfully incorporate new technology and adjust to the ever-changing demands of its customers. However, their rivals quickly adopted the newly implemented enhancements. Mobile apps and websites have been adopted in larger retail organizations to attract more consumers. As a direct result, Toys “R” Us introduced a search page that directed customers to Target’s website (Lee & Raziff, 2021). Nonetheless, the new strategy seems to have Target firm as the primary beneficiary.
Demographic
Toys “R” Us could not detect the changes in consumer behavior brought on by inventions in the toy industry. For instance, the younger generation favored utilizing the internet and social sites. In addition, the introduction of the internet and other social media platforms led to a 3.1 percent decline in the industry sales of toys. Thence, a significant number of their devoted clients who used the new technology switched to competing services with their rivals provided.
It is worth noting that Toys “R” Us failed to implement the fundamentals that would keep the organization afloat promptly. For example, corporate organizational notions and changes in customer service requirements. In this regard, these two factors seem to have been the undoing of the once-mighty Toys “R” Us. The entity’s store was compelled to embrace the future of internet selling as the industry started to shift. Regarding customer service, it seems that the company did not attempt to restructure how they portray themselves to buyers and what improvements they might give to make the purchasing process as efficient as feasible. Moreover, a radical overhaul on such a massive scale would need significant business transformation to be more effective. As Toys “R” Us became private, they might have replaced senior leadership roles with new people introducing a new trend of cutting-edge thinking and a new consumer image. The retailer’s failure was aided by the wasted chance to introduce fresh concepts, which perpetuated a losing cycle in many ways.
Conclusions and Findings
Successful business management is a complicated business notion that most organizations fail to achieve. As a result, corporations cannot just sit back and wait for favourable events to transpire. Of late, reckless borrowing is a major concern for businesses. When paired with the unpredictable, fragile, unclear future and complicated created by the technological superiority that shapes people’s minds, catastrophic outcomes are inevitable. To achieve success, every employee must exert the necessary effort from the top to the bottom of the hierarchy. However, issues emerge when a corporation with a 70-year history, such as Toys “R” Us, declares bankruptcy and subsequently collapses.
Therefore, the failure of Toys “R” Us business may be attributed to the brand suffering from a condition known as managerial myopia. They were still of the opinion that Toys “R” Us was the undisputed leader in the toy sector and that nothing negative could occur to the business. Furthermore, the organization succumbed to poor leadership, bad financial management choices, or an inability to adapt to the digital era. In addition, the titan’s collapse was caused by its failure to overcome insolvency. Accepting a caveat as a buyout is risky since more companies fail after choosing this route. In an age dominated by Amazon, equity is no longer a viable option. Toys “R” Us’s demise was a long time coming. From a comprehensive business case study, organizations may learn to better adapt to the times to make extreme choices and better prepare to remain competitive.
Recommendations
After examining its challenges, Toys “R” Us should have heeded the market’s evolution. They should have analysed their target audience and acted appropriately. The firm ought to have prioritized establishing a bigger online presence, given that youngsters no longer play with toys as they once did. Additionally, Toys “R” Us purposed to have adapted to the changing market and improve its e-shopping procedures. For example, their closest rivals, Target, and Amazon, provided free two-day delivery to consumers based on the amount of money they spent, boosting sales. Thus, Toys “R” Us may have created a similar campaign to attract its customers’ attention.
Nonetheless, Toys “R” Us should have fostered to broaden its business globally. Diversification is used by enterprises suffering from declining sales or profitability by forming partnerships with other businesses. Therefore, to remain relevant in the face of digital change and innovation, it is vital to embrace the future instead of maintaining the status quo (Covert, 2018). To be successful, various firms must adapt to this uncertain business climate since conventional retail is no longer viable. Several once-prominent retail titans in the United States face the retail apocalypse. Toys “R” Us should revamp the store’s physical appearance to save costs in specific areas and enhance its locations. In order to offer a more enjoyable shopping experience for customers, the store’s space and assortment should have been reduced by half. To provide a more enjoyable experience for customers, Toys “R” Us should have prioritized offering superior customer service. Hence, this would have resulted in increased customer loyalty for their firm.
References
Covert, B. (2018). The demise of Toys’ R’Us is a warning.The Atlantic.
Lewis, P. J. (2017). The erosion of play. International Journal of Play, 6(1), 10-23.
Li, S., Liu, X., & Tan, W. W. (2022). The study of Toys R Us’ LBO failure. In 2022 7th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2022) (pp. 1412-1417). Atlantis Press.
Mackay, D. (2017). The fantasy role-playing game: A new performing art. McFarland & Co.
Morgan, J., & Nasir, M. A. (2021). Financialised private equity finance and the debt gamble: The case of Toys R Us. New Political Economy, 26(3), 455-471.
Murnen, S. K. (2018). Fashion or action? Gender-stereotyped toys and social behavior. In Weisgram, E. S., & Dinella, L. M. (Eds.), Gender typing of children’s toys: How early play experiences impact development. American Psychological Association.
Rosenwald, M. S. (2017). Toys R Us founder Charles Lazarus has died. Here’s how he built — and lost — an empire. The Washington Post.
Stowell, D. P., & Raino, M. (2017). The Toys “R” Us LBO. Kellogg School of Management Cases.