Treatment Decision Process for Chronic Pain Management: A Case Study Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

A 43-year-old man using crutches went to the hospital complaining of leg pain. His medical history includes a fall on his right hip seven years ago, after which the pain began, and the discovered 75% tear of cartilage surrounding the hip joint. Symptoms include cramps with changes in the skin color and flexions of the toes. One of the neurologists the patient contacted diagnosed complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), also called reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). The family doctor denies RSD and is confident that the pain is of psychosomatic origin and caused by depression and refers the patient for a psychiatric examination. The man denies depression, and although he admits to some periodic sadness, he is confident that he can cope with it. The solutions proposed to the patient included Neurontin, later stopping the first drug, and administration of Zoloft, followed by the addition of Wellbutrin and Ativan.

The first decision for the treatment was to prescribe Neurontin (gabapentin) 300 mg at bedtime with a gradual increase in dose. This decision is justified since the drug is a standard solution for neuropathic pain management in CRPS (Money, 2019). Studies have shown that it has an inhibitory effect on voltage-gated calcium channels (Binder, 2021). As a result, Neurontin was expected to help reduce the patient’s pain. At the same time, side effects of spaciness and dizziness were possible (Binder, 2021). Therefore, the foggy feeling reported by the man was expected, but the medicine did not give the necessary pain relief. Moreover, the patient gave a high rate of the level of pain, indicating that the drug has no effect.

The second decision to treat the patient was to discontinue Neurontin and prescribe Zoloft (sertraline). This drug belongs to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), which are considered a new generation of antidepressants and can be applied to treat chronic pain (Onuțu et al., 2018). According to the evidence presented in various studies, as SSRI, Zoloft can affect serotonin levels and have an anti-inflammatory effect, affecting the patient’s pain (Onuțu et al., 2018). As a result, the expectations for this decision were a reduction in pain in a man. Moreover, side effects were also characteristic of this type of drug; for instance, they included anxiety, sexual dysfunction, and agitation (Onuțu et al., 2018). As the pain became more manageable, the subsequent decision was to correct and improve the current treatment.

Continuing treatment, the third decision was the addition of Wellbutrin (bupropion) and a short course of Ativan. The decrease in Zoloft was not considered, as the patient had improved pain management. The appointment of Wellbutrin is the evidence-based solution, as many studies prove a reduction in the side effect of SSRI-induced Erectile dysfunction (Yasin et al., 2019; Yee et al., 2018). Studies also support the justification for the short-term use of Ativan to reduce anxiety (Constable et al., 2022). These medicines can help the patient cope with side effects and control pain.

Thus, the patient’s treatment in the considered case focused on chronic pain management. The first decision to prescribe Neurontin failed, and the patient continued to feel severe pain. The second decision was the appointment of Zoloft, belonging to SSRIs, which are increasingly being considered for pain management. The medication showed a result in reducing pain but also caused some side effects. Therefore, the third decision, Wellbutrin and Ativan, aimed to minimize the side effects of continuing treatment with Zoloft.

References

Binder, M. R. (2021). American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 9(4), 122-134. Web.

Constable, P. A., Al-Dasooqi, D., Bruce, R., & Prem-Senthil, M. (2022). Clinical Optometry, 14, 13–25. Web.

Money, S. (2019). Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports, 7(4), 203-207. Web.

Onuțu, A. H., Dîrzu, D. S., & Petrișor, C. (2018). In Qu, Y. (Ed.), Serotonin (pp.1-22). IntechOpen. Web.

Yasin, W., Ahmed, S. I., & Gouthro, R. V. (2019). Cureus, 11(3), 1-4. Web.

Yee, A., Loh, H. S., Ong, T. A., Ng, C. G., & Sulaiman, A. H. (2018). American Journal of Men’s Health, 12(5), 1705-1718. Web.

Print
More related papers
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, August 23). Treatment Decision Process for Chronic Pain Management: A Case Study. https://ivypanda.com/essays/treatment-decision-process-for-chronic-pain-management-a-case-study/

Work Cited

"Treatment Decision Process for Chronic Pain Management: A Case Study." IvyPanda, 23 Aug. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/treatment-decision-process-for-chronic-pain-management-a-case-study/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Treatment Decision Process for Chronic Pain Management: A Case Study'. 23 August.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Treatment Decision Process for Chronic Pain Management: A Case Study." August 23, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/treatment-decision-process-for-chronic-pain-management-a-case-study/.

1. IvyPanda. "Treatment Decision Process for Chronic Pain Management: A Case Study." August 23, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/treatment-decision-process-for-chronic-pain-management-a-case-study/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Treatment Decision Process for Chronic Pain Management: A Case Study." August 23, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/treatment-decision-process-for-chronic-pain-management-a-case-study/.

Powered by CiteTotal, free reference generator
If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Cite
Print
1 / 1