Two-factor vs. Appraisal Theory of Emotion Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Also dubbed as Scachter-Singer Philosophy, the two-factor emotional theory is a concept that suggests that human being emotion is comprised of two components or factors. These parts include the cognition or the conscious arousal understanding and the physiological arousal. Derived from this theory, the cognitive label is applicable in the interpretation of physiological reactions to external events.

For an individual to experience emotion, both the elements should be present (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2006). However, some arousal forms occur, such as perspiration or increased heart rate, which makes the person put a label on it (arousal) in order to experience emotion.

The two-factor emotional theory might bring about a misattribution of arousal. For instance, two groups of male participants were asked to pass a river via two types of bridges. The first bridge was a suspended narrow and scary bridge, while the other bridge was more stable and safer when compared to the first one. An attractive female was at the far end of each bridge, prepared to meet the participants with a survey form to be filled. She gave the participants her phone number to call whenever they had any questions. It was noted that the woman was called by male participants who used the scary suspended bridge asking for a date.

This is because they felt some arousal by going across the river via the suspended bridge. The male participants misattributed their arousals towards the lady from the bridge, thus making the woman appear very attractive (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2006). Unlike two-factor emotional theory, the appraisal theory of emotion asserts that individuals’ emotional experience hinges on the manner in which they evaluate, interpret, or appraise events that occur around them. Two significant aspects, namely, what is believed to be the basis of the event and whether the events are interpreted as either being bad or good for the participants, are considered significant in this theory.

Reference

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. M. (2006). Social Psychology. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, January 23). Two-factor vs. Appraisal Theory of Emotion. https://ivypanda.com/essays/two-factor-vs-appraisal-theory-of-emotion/

Work Cited

"Two-factor vs. Appraisal Theory of Emotion." IvyPanda, 23 Jan. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/two-factor-vs-appraisal-theory-of-emotion/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Two-factor vs. Appraisal Theory of Emotion'. 23 January.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Two-factor vs. Appraisal Theory of Emotion." January 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/two-factor-vs-appraisal-theory-of-emotion/.

1. IvyPanda. "Two-factor vs. Appraisal Theory of Emotion." January 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/two-factor-vs-appraisal-theory-of-emotion/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Two-factor vs. Appraisal Theory of Emotion." January 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/two-factor-vs-appraisal-theory-of-emotion/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1