Blindsight is a fascinating phenomenon where people may still locate objects in their visual field without being aware of doing so despite having damage to their central visual cortex. These people can still see certain things but are effectively blind. Two pieces stand out in the study of this subject: a research report by Schmid et al. and a review piece by Overgaard.
These articles each have a unique structure. The article by Overgaard (2012) thoroughly reviews blindsight by navigating its historical setting and related debates. On the other hand, Schmid et al. (2010) give a systematic experimental report outlining their investigation into the brain networks underlying blindsight. Both articles are priceless on their own. Anyone wishing to write about or comprehend the overarching narrative of blindsight should start with Overgaard’s (2012) article because it offers a wide-ranging viewpoint. It provides context by providing a historical lens through which the subject might be seen.
The lateral geniculate nucleus plays a crucial part in the scientific mechanisms behind blindsight, according to Schmid et al. (2010), who go in-depth on the subject. Their specific conclusions highlight the importance of this nucleus in blindness and its potential as a fast pathway for detection during normal vision. Overgaard (2012), however, draws more general conclusions and addresses the more significant implications of blindsight research, particularly concerning the brain basis of consciousness and prospective paths for persons with visual impairments.
In light of the intended readership, Overgaard’s (2012) article appears to be written with researchers, students, and general enthusiasts in mind. With its thorough experimental methodology, the article by Schmid et al. (2010) is better appropriate for neuroscience experts and researchers. Schmid et al. (2010) article would be crucial for anyone interested in undertaking their research on blindsight. It outlines experimental techniques and outcomes that may direct future investigations. However, Overgaard’s (2012) study is still essential for a comprehensive comprehension, illuminating the topic’s broader context and historical development.
References
Overgaard, M. (2012). Blindsight: Recent and historical controversies on the blindness of blindsight. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(6), 607–614. Web.
Schmid, M. C., Mrowka, S. W., Turchi, J., Saunders, R. C., Wilke, M., Peters, A., Ye, F. Q., & Leopold, D. A. (2010). Blindsight depends on the lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 466(7304), 373–377. Web.
Loading...
