Human behavior and decision-making optimally rely on the constructs of the moral and ethical frameworks. Different societies uphold dynamic ethical principles, hence the distinction and variation on behavioral contexts. One of the philosophical mainframes that significantly influence the interpretation of the relationship between human behavior and ethics enshrines utilitarianism (Parfit 7). Despite the various foundations of utilitarianism, it involves the association of actions based on the good will of the majority, hence the subjective nature to individualized domain. It is an individual responsibility to engage in an act or make a decision that fosters significant benefit to the vast population percentage. Over the decades, there is a profound utilitarianism effect concerning the increasing human population that highly affects quality of living universally. The structuring of the human society aptly relies on the concept of two-dimensional approaches, that is, right and wrong profoundly attributed by utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism is a philosophical construct that offers an insight into the confinement of human behavior as either right or wrong. Research establishes that human behaviour mainly focuses on the essence of intent and the outcome (Browning and Walter 2). On the one hand, the deontological concept establishes that it is highly important to consider the human intent to engage in a particular action as a formative aspect of justifying right or wrong. On the other hand, Bentham founded the utilitarian concept through the teleological spectrum. According to the teleological foundation, it is crucial to determine right or wrong based on the measure of the outcome. Therefore, utilitarian concept indicates that it is paramount that personnel engage in acts that render more happiness among the counterparts. Ideally, an action that is right fosters more happiness and lesser pain and suffering among the counterpart. The controversial baseline focuses on the outcome of an action despite the moral and ethical implication of the distinctive engagements.
There are different values posed by the utilitarian concept across the human population regarding ethical and moral implications. According to research, the core aspect of enhancing quantitative utilitarianism lies in the aspect of determining the interdependence between certainty and uncertainty, purity, fecundity, extent, and propinquity and remoteness (Mill 2). One of the issues with the utilitarian concept encompass the subjective nature of happiness and pain. Despite the attempt to define the significance of different human engagements, Bentham lacks the adept insight onto the perceptive baseline concerning the formation of a community mainly because of the imperative overview concerning happiness and pain. The philosopher indicates that quantitative utilitarianism renders the necessity to incorporate measures that improve community members’ well-being. Therefore, a community is formed based on the common interests among the counterparts. However, the controversy lies in the ability to determine the gradients fostering the measure. Notably, as a subjective overview, utilitarianism renders an apt weakness based on the reliance of determining the value of the outcome without justifying the profound essence of intent as either wrong or right.
In a different spectrum, the utilitarian philosophy plays a crucial role in understanding human behavior and projecting the relevance of the relationship. The comprehension of utilitarian concept significantly contributes in the determination of ethical considerations during policy-making. It is the responsibility of key stakeholders to uphold the core foundations of a truth. According to Browning and Walter, utilitarianism needs a rethink due to the controversy that emanates from the profound initiative on defining the truth (2). Although a conglomerate fosters the determination of the truth, it is crucial to determine the happiness index among the entities involved. Fundamentally, utilitarianism fosters the foundation of objective insight during the decision and policy making session.
The reliance on happiness among the majority is one of the sustainable practices that improves the well-being of community members. Sustainability is the incorporation of strategies that enhance trickle-down of accrued benefits among the dynamic institutions. Utilitarianism is an initiative that fosters the alignment of policy making decisions along the gradient of improving the quality of living (Parfit 8). On the one hand, the concept renders the controversy on ethical considerations mainly because of the adept focus on the outcome than the intent. Contrary, the framework attributes to the core indication of community members’ interests. An excellent demonstration is the intent of an individual to intentionally cause harm among the elderly by signing them up in the care institutions for the old age personnel. However, the elderly finds happiness from the resolution due to the opportunity to interact with the peers. Although the intention involved isolating the elderly from the family members, it is rightful due to the profound outcome on boosting the individual’s happiness index.
Utilitarian concept is dynamically exploited across distinctive mainframes to determine the significance of dynamic occurrences. According to research, one of the controversies that demands the use of utilitarianism philosophy in understanding the significance is overpopulation and the impact to the quality of living (Smart and Bernard 4). Since the advent of technological advancement, different initiatives steered the boost in the human population increase and emergence of distinct issues. Research establishes that the increase in the populace is a multifaceted phenomenon that highly affects the quality of living and the natural environment. Computerization fostered the intensification in human activities based on the automation of systems and processes. Further, the practice rendered movement of people from different regions and the interaction causing relationship buildings. Overpopulation is a necessity mainly because of the intensified levels of human activities and the importance of balancing supply and demand.
Within the environmental spectrum, overpopulation negatively impacts nature’s aesthetic value due to the promptness to create settlement areas. In this case, people clear trees and pristine natural areas to accommodate the increasing human populace. According to the quantitative utilitarian concept, deforestation is a justified practice based on the core outcome of intensified happiness among people while compromising the aesthetic and pristine state of the natural environment (Parfit 10). However, deforestation and increased human activities exploiting natural resources caused globalization and climate change. In the short-term, the overexploitation of natural resources attributed to the increase in human population reflected through the happiness index. Researchers establish that there is an interdependent relationship between sustainability and community members’ happiness index.
In the short-run, the consideration of the utilitarian concept hindered the derivation of projected negative effects of the endeavor. Nevertheless, the long-term perspective on the interdependent relationship between sustainability and people’s happiness index is a utilitarian context with a hedonic outcome. Research indicates that the rate of human population increase profoundly impacts the quality of living due to the influence on the interdependent relationship (Browning and Walter 5). The researchers further depict that the core mandate among the counterparts involves incorporating measures that render adept effect to all entities. A smaller population with higher margin in wealth acquisition poses lesser utilitarian effect than a larger population with lower margin on the quality of living. Primarily, the main goal encompasses the considerate volume amassing the increased happiness index.
The pursuit of happiness is a multidimensional phenomenon across the overpopulation and quality of living spectrum. One of the vital sustainable initiatives appreciating utilitarian concept is the advocacy for the regulation of human population increase. The increase in the human population is a necessity in the establishment of a consumption market for the products. However, research indicates that it is crucial to enhance a balance in the distribution of resources (Mill 4). Therefore, the implementation of the utilitarian concept focuses on the essence of communistic and socialism tendencies than the capitalistic economic foundations. The main reason enshrines the reliance of the happiness index based on the volumes than the quality. As a result, it is preferable there is a compromise in the quality of living than the essence of discriminate distribution of wealth causing the marginalization of communities and varied levels of poverty.
Within the economic construct and its relation to globalization, the utilitarian concept aptly advocates for the human population increase regulation. According to research, one of the steering factors that foster the marginalization of populations based on wealth acquisition include capitalism (Parfit 11). The economic philosophy focuses on the privatization and optimal acquisition of wealth that is contrary to the communism approach. There is proficient application of the utilitarian concept in the communist countries mainly because of the promotion of equality regarding the distribution of wealth. Nevertheless, the aspect poses a profound challenge to the improvement in the quality of living at the expense of happiness index among the community members.
The application of the utilitarian concept steers sustainability and globalization while disregarding the apt essence of capitalism. The core mandate of overpopulation regards fostering the establishment of a market hence balancing supply and demand. The notion is prominently fostered by the aspect of technological advancement and sustainability. However, the globalization overwhelms the capitalism effect to render the core happiness index based on the better quality of living (Parfit 12). It is the key responsibility of leadership to implement policies that enhance distributive social justice. Globalization optimally reflects utilitarianism mainly because of the focus on enhancing a significant connection among people globally despite the geographical distance. The perspective fosters an intensified happiness index due to the exchange of socio-cultural and economic values.
An intensified exchange of socio-cultural values globally attributes to the identification of a social identity among the community members. The identification of a social identity significantly contributes in self-awareness that trickles-down to the increase in the happiness index. Therefore, globalization is a facilitator of the utilitarian concept based on the vital goal to promote self-realization across the global human population. In a different spectrum, sustainability further dictates the efficacy level of globalization essence mainly because of the focus on effective distribution of the accrued benefits (Parfit 15). Apart from the exchange of socio-cultural values, institutions extend business practices across various regions to enhance the economic growth and development. Globalization significantly relies on the coordination of all community members despite the challenging issue on population increase.
Utilitarian philosophy renders a significant insight concerning justified human behavior and the relation to ethical and moral conduct. On the one hand, there is a profound controversy regarding the advocacy for ethical considerations mainly because of the focus on the outcome than the intent and process. In this case, it is easier for an individual to violate a regulation with an aim of enhancing happiness among the majority. Although the approach fosters the improvement on happiness among the counterparts, it is challenging based on the subjective essence (Smart and Bernard 6). On the other hand, the measure of happiness and pain is subjective on people’s perception concerning certain issues. Ideally, the application of the utilitarian concept across the distinctive frameworks fosters the understanding regarding the importance of distributive social justice system despite the steering interdependent relationships.
Consequently, utilitarianism contributes in the foundation of right and wrong across distinctive mainframes on human activities and behavioral context. Different administrations use dynamic approaches in the advocacy for equality. Therefore, an intersection of the utilitarian concept with the distinctive conceptual mainframes renders an understanding regarding the promotion of ethical considerations. It is the mandate of the institutional leaders and individuals to engage in activities and processes that intensify the quality of living. In this case, the solution to the shortcoming from the application of utilitarianism lies in the aspect of advancing implementation of sustainability practice. The lack of clarity on the interdependence risks the incurrence of apt negative effects to the effect of human behavior. Utilitarianism applies to the socio-cultural, economic, and political domains to establish the significance of equality and distributive justice system. The confinement of human engagements to right and wrong attributing to optimal happiness renders the core foundation on sustainability and globalization while exploiting technological advancement as a facilitation tool.
Works Cited
Browning, Heather, and Walter Veit. “Does utilitarianism need a rethink? Review of Louis Narens and Brian Skyrms’ The Pursuit of Happiness.” Journal of Economic Methodology, (2021), pp. 1-10.
Mill, John Stuart. “2001. Utilitarianism.” The basic writings of John Stuart Mill (1863), pp. 1-10.
Parfit, Derek. “Overpopulation and the Quality of Life.” The repugnant conclusion. Springer, Dordrecht, (2004), pp. 7-22.
Smart, John Jamieson Carswell, and Bernard Williams. Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge University Press, (2008), pp. 2-16.