In the present article “What theory is not, theorizing is”, the author intends to describe what distinguishes theory from theorizing (Weick, 1995). In this context, criticizing unconnected references is one of the most remarkable ideas because citing other researchers’ works is an indispensable part of formulating theories. What makes the paragraph useful and enlightening is the fact that it sheds light on the significance of proper references for researchers, reviewers, and editors and singles out the typical mistakes.
Weick addresses the lesser-known aspect of quoting: ceremonial citations that do not bring any sense to appear frequently. The author makes readers ponder about what requirements a researcher is expected to meet and what is important to create a theory. Those who carry out researches regularly will find this paragraph and the whole article useful since they may help enhance the quality of their works. This paragraph is also recommended to research beginners who might be obsessed with formal standards and fail to make their work concise and pertinent.
Another issue touches upon reviewers who tend to introduce more references as substitutes for theory: sometimes there is no ground why a certain reference is needed (Weick, 1995). The paragraph proves that recommendations contents are equally important as the theory suggested. Thus, reviewers are also reminded that every reference prescribed should be compatible.
Finally, the author tells about the editors’ and reviewers’ attitudes towards reference overuse. As a rule, they are not tolerant of the material that takes much space. This information may also guide researchers and help them set their priorities when they write their papers.
Overall, the present paragraph is helpful: researchers and reviewers have a chance to improve the quality of their works. Experienced specialists refresh their memory about reference requirements. Younger professionals obtain a valuable piece of advice.
References
Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385-390.