Women in Politics: A State-by-State Comparison Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

In general, women have made tremendous strides in politics over the last 50 years. A half-century ago, it was extremely rare for women to hold office in the United States. More women started to become involved in politics during the feminist revolution in the 1960s and 1970s, and today we see the results of their efforts. Dozens of women are now represented in Congress. In 2008, Hilary Clinton nearly became the first woman nominated for President by either of the two major political parties. A woman was on the ballot for vice-president that year, and multiple women are rumored as potential presidential or vice-presidential candidates in 2012.

These events on the national level have been well-documented. However, fewer commentators have noticed the wide variation in women’s political progression from state to state. In no state do women make up a majority of state legislators? However, some states have a much larger percentage of women in their state legislature than others do.

According to the Center for American Women in Politics at Rutgers University, Colorado has the highest percentage of women in its state legislature at 41%. Vermont, Arizona, Hawaii, and Minnesota are ranked 2-5, with 39%, 34%, 34%, and 32% respectively (“Women in State Legislative Office 2011”). In contrast, South Carolina has the fewest percentage of women in its state legislature with only 9%, while Oklahoma (13%), Alabama (14%), Mississippi (15%), and North Dakota (15%) round out the bottom five (“Women in State Legislative Office 2011”).

This is an extremely wide variation. At first glance, there does not appear to be a common theme between the five states with the highest percentage of women in their state legislatures. One assumption many pundits make is that liberal states are more likely to elect women to office than more socially conservative states. Under this view, liberals are more likely to support working women, while traditional conservatives are more apt to believe that women belong at home raising their children.

This is a stereotypical assumption in some respects, and a look at the states with the highest rates of women participating in politics does not bear it out. The state with the highest percentage of women in its state legislature, Colorado, is a “swing state” that historically has leaned Republican (although this may be starting to change). Vermont, Hawaii, and Minnesota are solidly liberal states, but Arizona has been one of the most conservative states in the country. One possible explanation may be that Colorado and Arizona are Western states that were settled by pioneers. Since life was often difficult on the frontier, many pioneer families needed to have women earn a living to make ends meet. As a result, Western states may be more open to women participating in politics than other states are.

On the other hand, the states with the fewest percentage of women in state legislatures seem to back up the theory of conservative states being less willing to accept women in politics. South Carolina, Oklahoma, Alabama, and Mississippi are all conservative Southern states. North Dakota is also a conservative state (although it is also a Western state, which seems to refute the theory that Western states are more tolerant of women in politics). Even in these states, attitudes may be starting to change. South Carolina elected a woman as its Governor last year in a well-publicized race. However, attitudes do not change overnight. The vast majority of candidates for office, male or female, are in their late-30’s or older. These potential candidates may have been raised to believe that politics is a men’s club. Even if attitudes are changing in these states, it may take a decade or two before the change is reflected in state legislatures.

One interesting note is that Pennsylvania only ranks 42nd in the percentage of women in its state legislature, with 17% (“Women in State Legislative Office 2011”). This is surprising since Pennsylvania is a Northeastern state that is thought to be relatively moderate. However, Pennsylvania is a state that has historically been dominated by political machines in both major parties. Research has shown that large party organizations are less likely to recruit women to run for office (Sabonmatsu 20-21). Political machines usually throw their support behind candidates who have already served in the machine. Since women rarely entered politics until recent decades, they are less likely to have a long track record of working within a party. This is another factor that can only be changed with time.

Ultimately, parties will be more likely to recruit women to run for office when there are more examples of women winning elections. This can be frustrating since it is impossible to win an election without getting a chance to run. Few people of either gender have the financial resources to run for office on their own, so some level of outside support is necessary. However, as more women run for office win elections, more women will be recruited to run for office. This will be true even in states where relatively few women currently hold office. While old attitudes do not vanish overnight, political parties generally place a higher value on winning elections than they do on any traditional gender stereotypes.

Works Cited

Sabonmatsu, Kira. Candidate Recruitment and Women’s Election to the State Legislatures. Report prepared for the Center for American Women and Politics, Rutgers U. September 2003: 20-21. Print.

Women in State Legislative Office 2011. Center for American Women and Politics, Rutgers U.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, January 9). Women in Politics: A State-by-State Comparison. https://ivypanda.com/essays/women-in-politics-a-state-by-state-comparison/

Work Cited

"Women in Politics: A State-by-State Comparison." IvyPanda, 9 Jan. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/women-in-politics-a-state-by-state-comparison/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Women in Politics: A State-by-State Comparison'. 9 January.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Women in Politics: A State-by-State Comparison." January 9, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/women-in-politics-a-state-by-state-comparison/.

1. IvyPanda. "Women in Politics: A State-by-State Comparison." January 9, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/women-in-politics-a-state-by-state-comparison/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Women in Politics: A State-by-State Comparison." January 9, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/women-in-politics-a-state-by-state-comparison/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1