Home > Free Essays > Politics & Government > Law Enforcement > American Police Corruption and Its Classification
Cite this

American Police Corruption and Its Classification Report


Introduction

Police corruption is one of the most prevalent issues in the United States. The invention of camera phones gave everybody the ability to document the wrongful actions of police and have undermined the trust people had in the police authority. The presented video shows one possible case of police misconduct. This paper will analyze the ethics of this action.

Incident Classification

The video shows a large, male police officer pinning a small woman to the side of his patrol car. The woman must have been standing on the pavement before she was pinned because her feet are dangling off the ground. It is unknown what the police officer asks or tells the woman because only a few of the words are audible. The woman is distressed because her body language is very protective. She is also not struggling so there is no justification for this kind of force being applied to her. By the end, the woman was not charged with anything, so it is unclear why this incident occurred (Francis, 2016). I believe this incident can be classified as minor misconduct.

Justification for Classification

To justify this classification, I would like to overview the conditions for the use of force. While they are not strictly defined by any agency, their nature depends on the context of the situation and the need for self-defense of the officer, or others (“Police Use of Force,” 2017).

The officer in the video used physical and verbal restraint when the civilian was not visibly struggling to getaway. The complete context for this is unknown, but some information about the woman suggests she was aggressively yelling at a man who “propositioned” her before the officers arrived. However, this man is not seen in the video. The pinned woman was not armed and was physically weaker due to how easily he was able to hold her in midair. However, the woman did not receive lasting physical harm, lowering the level of misconduct (Francis, 2016).

Recommendation

This incident suggests that the officer is willing to overstep the boundaries of his authority without a just reason. His actions were not justified by the context and his partner did not do anything to stop him suggesting that both of them require disciplinary action. Both officers should be retrained to fully understand the situations where such force is permitted. The officer who perpetrated the misconduct should have a three-year discipline letter added to his file and should be suspended from specialty assignments for the next three months. These actions should serve as a just punishment because the actions of the officer do not reflect the position of the police department so he should not represent it in a specialty, and especially public setting.

Evaluation of the Type of Corruption

The type of corruption is hard to evaluate due to the lack of information on the incident, but it is a likely case of “rotten apples.” The severity of the force compared to the strength of opposition is such that it is hard to believe that this action was accidental or justifiable. However, the data shows that police misconduct in the DC area has already cost the state 31 million dollars which suggests that it is the case of “rotten barrels” rather than just the “apples” (“Police misconduct complaints,” 2016). Greater supervision of both the officer and the police of the state should be conducted to find the true cause of these actions, as well as the support of “whistleblowers” that might help uncover internal corruption.

References

Francis, E. (2016). . ABC News. Web.

. (2016). The Washington Times. Web.

. (2017). National Institute of Justice. Web.

This report on American Police Corruption and Its Classification was written and submitted by your fellow student. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.
Removal Request
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda.
Request the removal

Need a custom Report sample written from scratch by
professional specifically for you?

Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar

301 certified writers online

GET WRITING HELP
Cite This paper

Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, November 19). American Police Corruption and Its Classification. Retrieved from https://ivypanda.com/essays/american-police-corruption-and-its-classification/

Work Cited

"American Police Corruption and Its Classification." IvyPanda, 19 Nov. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/american-police-corruption-and-its-classification/.

1. IvyPanda. "American Police Corruption and Its Classification." November 19, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/american-police-corruption-and-its-classification/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "American Police Corruption and Its Classification." November 19, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/american-police-corruption-and-its-classification/.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "American Police Corruption and Its Classification." November 19, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/american-police-corruption-and-its-classification/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'American Police Corruption and Its Classification'. 19 November.

More related papers