Conflict is an all-encompassing term, which is used when describing the consequences of varying standpoints of parties. However, despite the universal nature of this concept, the perceptions and, consequently, presentations of individuals differ depending on the goals they have in examining it. They can also be distinguished by one’s opinion or a group’s conclusion on the matter. Therefore, it is necessary to compare my perspective and that of other learners to gain a better understanding.
From my point of view, conflict is a collision of opposing interests in the first place. It is an occasion, which follows the impossibility of finding peaceful ways of managing issues. In addition, This situation implies that each side inevitably strives to prove the greater feasibility of their suggestions. The same phenomenon is described by Fineberg (2017), who claims that conflict is the confidence of one party in judgment, which leads to attempts to justify its reasonability. This stance means that any course of action of people is determined by the success of their argumentation. In turn, for Acemoglu et al. (2020), conflict is a societal problem, which emerges as a result of the lack of essential resources. This claim presents a more global outlook since not persons but entities are involved.
To summarize, the perception of conflict as per my philosophy does not correspond to others’ thoughts. The former is based on the general understanding of the necessity of finding common ground, whereas the latter’s orientation is on more specific aspects. They can be either an intention to justify opinions or a fight for resources, and both challenges mean the impossibility of satisfying everyone’s needs and the requirement of developing a single solution.
References
Acemoglu, D., Fergusson, L., & Johnson, S. (2020). Population and conflict. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(4), 1565-1604.
Fineberg, H. V. (2017). Conflict of interest: why does it matter?Jama, 317(17), 1717-1718.