Analysis of “The One Laptop Per Child” Project Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

The One Laptop Per Child project is regarded as one of the most famous ones in the technological and media world due to its intentions to help poor children and to introduce products, taking into consideration current conditions (Wikipedia, n.d.). The articles by Jon Evans and Paul Marks present a clear picture of how this project develops, underline strong and weak sides of this idea to provide children with laptops, and describe how human attitudes, inabilities to find out proper financial support, and the desire to earn money in a short period of time may lead to the collapse of dreams and pure intentions. Mr. Marks creates his article in 2008, when the idea to provide children with opportunities uses small and effective computers at schools and homes seemed to be captivating and winning. The work by Mr. Evans appeared at the beginning of 2009, and this author attempted to analyze why this project went wrong and when exactly the mistake was made. In their articles, Marks and Evans evaluate the worth of the One Laptop Per Child project and the opportunity for children to be closer to the developing technological world, explain the difficulties, its organizers face, and make personal predictions of the project’s future and its ability to change and improve this world.

Worth of the Project under Consideration

Technological progress with its ability to produce “unintentional consequences and side-consequences” (Schomberg, 2007 p. 303) is probably one of the most interesting and up-to-date problems to discuss in different types of media. The Internet is considered to be one of the frequently used sources that can change human lives and where novelties of the technological world are described (Comer, 2007 & Osso, 2000); this is why the articles, found in the Internet are not only reliable and informative pieces of work, but also interesting and illustrative sources, where people with any taste may become involve into reading. Marks (2008) admits that more than 600,000 children have already got the opportunity to use XO computers, offered by the One Laptop Per Child project. These computers are created to involve children in our every day life: small sizes, word processing, access to music and games, and Linux operating system promote an easy-to-use technology. The major worth of this project is that children have a chance to study computers, networking system, and other pros of laptops without a threat of finding out some obscene impressions, dirty video or audio files, and other vulgar information. The article by Paul Marks helps to comprehend the reasons of why this project has been created and realize the consequences of such project and their abilities to change the world.

Challenges Connected to the Project

In his article, Jon Evans presents one of the most serious ideas that the project One Laptop Per Child has already gone wrong, and it becomes hard to change the situation. He says that the company has laid off half of the staff, incomes of the company are far from being satisfactory, and the idea to distribute laptops to poor children was doomed to failure from the very beginning (Evans, 2009). And even in spite of the fact that it was “a learning project, not a laptop project” (Maxwell, 2009, p. 95), its failure is discussed on different levels. The peculiar feature of Evans’ article is that he uses own experience to present clear facts. This author cannot help but wonder “at what point did teaching children an interface fundamentally different from the windowing UI by all other computer seem like a good idea to anyone?” (Evans, 2008, para. 5) Such a provoking idea makes this article very interesting for different people. First of all, student should comprehend that a new product offered by a sophisticated scientists fails, this is why it should be interesting to read more information on this topic. Parents should find this article useful as well to comprehend what services and technologies are better to use for their children. And finally, even the developers of this project should not take offense because of these words, as it is another stimulus to make their work better.

Strong and Weak Sides of Marks and Evans’ Articles

The idea to present a laptop project for children becomes more and more popular among society (Sorondo, Malinvaud, & Lena, 2007). The articles by Jon Evans and Paul Marks are one of those media sources, which touch upon the ideas of the One Laptop Per Child project, its strengths and weaknesses, its necessity, and its challenges. The purpose of these two articles is to not only inform and share personal opinions about the concept, but also provide the reader with a chance to comprehend why such a great project undergoes all these changes and suffers losses. Proper structures of the articles, attention to modern human needs, abilities of technology to meet all the demands, and people’s desire to improve their present and future – all this makes the articles captivating. The authors do not try to persuade readers accept their points of view, they just describe and as ordinary people tell about the consequences of events, the mistakes, made by people, and the hopes, inherent to both children and grown ups. Taking into consideration the words by Mr. Negroponte in Marks’ article (2008), it is possible to say that people usually try to bring democracy and improvement their ways, and these authors show that they can do it their ways and do it perfectly in their articles about the One Laptop Per Child project.

Conclusion

Paul Marks and Jon Evans are the authors of the articles about XO computers, offered by the One Laptop Per Child project; they present their ideas and thoughts about the same project with a difference in several months. These works introduce two different perspectives on the project that touches children and adults in many countries. Marks writes about the positive sides of this project, the necessity to support children with any financial background. His words prove that Nicholas Negroponte’s intentions are great indeed, however, the terrible obstacles of the reality prevent this idea’s accomplishment. Evans’ article is another perspective of the project under discussion, where the author admits how thoughtless human decisions and how useless people’s money and efforts can be. These two articles touch the reader to respect human work and ideas, which are directed to help the others and to take care about people’s future and generations. Not each human action may lead to positive and effective results, however, it is not necessary to criticize everything after the first failure but to have enough patience and intelligence to provide the organization with another opportunity to show talent and skills.

Reference List

Comer, D. (2007). The Internet Book: Everything You Need to Know about Computer Networking and How the Internet Works. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Evans, J. (2009). One Laptop Per Child: What Went Wrong. The Walrus Blogs. Web.

Marks, P. (2008). . New Scientist. Web.

Maxwell, J. C. (2009). Put Your Dream to the Test: 10 Questions that Will Help You See It and Seize It. Wheaton, Illinois: Thomas Nelson Inc.

. (n.d). In Wikipedia. Web.

Osso, R. (2000). Handbook of Emerging Communications Technologies: The Nest Decade. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

Schomberg, R. (2007). From the Ethics of Technology to the Ethics of Knowledge Assessment. In Assessing Societal Implications of Converging Technological Development by Gerhard Banse. Edition Sigma.

Sorondo, M. S., Malinvaud, E., & Lena, P. (2007). Globalization and Education: Proceedings of the Joint Working Group, the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, Casino Pio IV. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, March 10). Analysis of "The One Laptop Per Child" Project. https://ivypanda.com/essays/analysis-of-the-one-laptop-per-child-project/

Work Cited

"Analysis of "The One Laptop Per Child" Project." IvyPanda, 10 Mar. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/analysis-of-the-one-laptop-per-child-project/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Analysis of "The One Laptop Per Child" Project'. 10 March.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Analysis of "The One Laptop Per Child" Project." March 10, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/analysis-of-the-one-laptop-per-child-project/.

1. IvyPanda. "Analysis of "The One Laptop Per Child" Project." March 10, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/analysis-of-the-one-laptop-per-child-project/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Analysis of "The One Laptop Per Child" Project." March 10, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/analysis-of-the-one-laptop-per-child-project/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1