Argumentative Essay: Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace Essay

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda
Updated: Oct 26th, 2023

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a debate about vaccine mandates for companies. Many businesses, even those that do not deal with medical services, have introduced rules to exclude unvaccinated workers from workplace activities. This essay argues that worker vaccination should not be mandatory because it leads to unjust firings, makes information on employees’ health and beliefs less private, and does not consider natural immunity and its effects.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Essay on Argumentative Essay: Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace
808 writers online

Argument 1, Supporting Points, and Counterargument

Mandatory vaccines cause people to lose jobs and limit their ability to support families. First, when all workers are expected to be fully vaccinated, it leads to discrimination and affects some employees who can be their families’ only sources of financial support. In New York City, around 3,000 municipal employees have been threatened with getting fired if they refuse to get vaccinated (Fitzsimmons). This can affect both these employees’ personal situations and citizens’ access to services. Second, firing people who can do some work and wish to perform their duties is not the best decision morally because it will create effects their children as well (Bravest for Choice). Third, mandates cause additional difficulties for companies since they will have to spend time and money to replace these workers fast enough and without stopping to deliver services (Fitzsimmons). The counterargument for this point is that companies do not want firings; it is the workers who decide to quit (Fitzsimmons). However, employees who want to be free to make choices would disagree with it.

Argument 2, Supporting Points, and Counterargument

When vaccination is mandatory, workers have to report private information related to their personal life and health issues. To start with, vaccination records are treated as confidential information, but employees have to make it open for companies to avoid being fired (American Academy of Family Physicians). Continue, some workers can be unsure that vaccination will benefit them or have specific private reasons to refuse vaccination, for instance, diseases or religious beliefs. Finally, employees with good reasons to stay unvaccinated, for example, allergies, have to prove it, but this is not the type of information employers should be supposed to know (American Academy of Family Physicians). The counterargument for this position is that reporting this information is not obligatory, and employees can just quit if they want to keep it private. This attitude could reduce the problem of privacy, but it strengthens the issue of firings.

Argument 3, Supporting Points, and Counterargument

Natural immunity offers protection against the said infection, and it needs to be considered to weaken vaccine mandates. To start with, medical experts agree that natural immunity protects the body against severe COVID-19 (Magarakis and Kelen). However, workers who have been infected are still recommended to get vaccines (Magarakis and Kelen). Moreover, to get immunity from vaccines, one usually needs more than one dose, and natural immunity develops faster than that (Magarakis and Kelen). Finally, based on this, people who have had the infection should be allowed to keep working without overwhelming their immune system due to vaccination. One counterargument is that natural immunity might weaken faster than after vaccination (Magarakis and Kelen). Despite this, the power of essential immunity is not called into question.

Conclusion

Finally, mandatory vaccination for workers is negative because it causes mass firings against people’s will, ignores essential immunity, and makes workers report their private information. It goes without saying that vaccines are important, but workers should be able to make informed decisions because it is their health. U.S. society would require a lot of work to create a solution that could protect the nation without creating inequalities.

Works Cited

American Academy of Family Physicians. “”. 2021. Web.

Bravest for Choice. “Let Them Work.” BravestforChoice. Web.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper

Fitzsimmons, Emma G. “”. The New York Times. 2022. Web.

Maragakis, Lisa, and Gabor David Kelen. “COVID Natural Immunity: What You Need to Know”. John Hopkins Medicine. 2021. Web.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Argumentative Essay: Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, October 26). Argumentative Essay: Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace. https://ivypanda.com/essays/argumentative-essay-vaccine-mandates-in-the-workplace/

Work Cited

"Argumentative Essay: Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace." IvyPanda, 26 Oct. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/argumentative-essay-vaccine-mandates-in-the-workplace/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Argumentative Essay: Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace'. 26 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Argumentative Essay: Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace." October 26, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/argumentative-essay-vaccine-mandates-in-the-workplace/.

1. IvyPanda. "Argumentative Essay: Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace." October 26, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/argumentative-essay-vaccine-mandates-in-the-workplace/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Argumentative Essay: Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace." October 26, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/argumentative-essay-vaccine-mandates-in-the-workplace/.

Powered by CiteTotal, cite machine
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1