Art, religion, philosophy, and literature offer resources for celebration of life in a way to stave off at least part of the suffering that afflicts us. They bring us meaning and knowledge. This knowledge is derived from the process of the liberal tradition. I firmly believe that these phenomena offer an equal and fair citizenry and appropriate systems of social interaction. Thus, this reflective treatise’s fundamental concept is a detailed analysis of the contribution of art, religion, philosophy, and literature to knowledge and sustainable life at minimal suffering.
We will write a custom Critical Writing on Art, Religion, Philosophy, and Literature in Society specifically for you
301 certified writers online
I believe that philosophy has four roles: to provide the basis of our reasoning, helps citizens to understand their social world, examines the limits of pragmatic political possibilities, and reconcile people. It is self-evident that philosophy attempts to achieve a utopian society. In my opinion, the religious system of any company is built on its beliefs and traditions. Beliefs and practices are typically theorized.
They could base on utilitarianism theory, which strongly supports maximum utility. In this case, action or thought would be right if it brings the greatest happiness to the most significant majority. Hence, it is a moral principle and does not take into perspective the farness aspect. Therefore, I suggest that these interactive premises surround organization and coexistence within optimal satisfaction as religion promises to assist in carrying a heavy burden to its followers and share according to everyone’s needs. The correct principle for any belief should depend on the idea’s nature (Norris, 16).
Therefore, utilitarianism would impose the tenets on the minority and function lawfully within the majority group. As a matter of fact, in a just society, it should be the volition of the citizens to comply with whatever principle is chosen. This would facilitate favorable social conditions, which are essential in promoting the process of social cooperation. Fortunately, religion seems to offer this aspect to a believer whose thoughts and practices are guarded and controlled by the philosophy of sharing and bearing the burden for one another.
In giving the verdict about the social system, I am convinced that the beliefs must be justified. As stated in the reflective equilibrium concept, ideas tend to cohere with it entirely. One’s abstract’s hypotheses should explain one’s general convictions, defining one’s specific judgments. The beliefs facilitate explanation for mutual support. This may be hard to attain, given that it requires adjustments to one’s set of ideas.
This would contrast foundationalism, which posits that some beliefs serve as the foundation on which all other thoughts are based (Dickinson and Oates, 14). This would be necessary for a fair social system to have logical beliefs. In my opinion, I have observed that Art is used as an expression to resonate with the need for a better life and communicate past negative experiences. Understanding these unfortunate occurrences helps society appreciate the need for cohesion and peaceful coexistence despite the company’s dynamics (Dickinson and Oates, 12).
To understand legitimacy as the citizens subscribe to different ideologies in a free society, philosophy immediately creeps in. I am convinced that appreciating the social power as a power of the people enables the company to function coherently within minimal tension. If legitimacy is not well resolved, then the stability of the society is under threat. Therefore, the power of literature surfaces by the natural law that endorses the light of principles and ideals acceptable to common human reason characterized by the need to belong aspect. This calls for reasonable citizens who can tolerate as well as respect others of different opinions.
Hence, I propose literature as a fundamental tool for appreciating the diversity of worldviews in our society. This leads to reasonable pluralism where the citizens accept the essentials of democracy and healthy competition (Norris, 14). Personal conviction then forms the basis of the ideal fundamental social norms that minimize conflict in creating a systematic orientation. This makes the aspect of natural complexity, which aligns the belief element to a line of thinking.
The legitimacy leads to acceptability but does not mean the system is just. The moral standards answer questions of both freedom and equality. This is through the fundamental structures of society. For a fair system, the cooperation should be reasonable to all free and equal citizens. Every citizen has equal fundamental liberties, fair equality of opportunities, and the least-advantaged members get the most significant benefits. In my opinion, this calls for an original position to determine terms of cooperation under fair conditions for equal and free citizens (Norris, 15).
Conclusively, in determining how Art, religion, philosophy, and literature offer resources for the celebration of life, a thorough analysis of the beliefs held by society should be done. The system should be based on fundamental ideas. In addition, the fair social network should guarantee equal rights to all free citizens as guided by the ideals of religion and philosophical inclination, as expressed in Art and literature.
Dickinson, Emily, and Oates, Joyce. Essential Dickinson. New York: HarperCollins, 2006. Print.
Norris, Kathleen. The Cloister Walk. New York: Riverhead Books, 1996. Print.