The most important lesson that I have learned from the peer review is that the article’s content takes precedence over its style. All ideas presented in the paper must be logically sequenced. Another lesson is that the thesis must be clearly articulated in the introduction, which presents relevant information to readers. When revising body paragraphs, it is necessary to ensure that they are coherent and do not introduce holes in a logical progression of mini ideas in the article.
Also, a paragraph’s conclusion has to allow for a natural transition because all paragraphs must be positioned in a broader context of the article. The peer-review revealed that the findings of the study must be better articulated. It is hard to disagree with the results of the review.
In order to revise the paper by next week, it is necessary to remove in-text citations and references at the end of the article. It will help to align the article’s format with that of the publication. Furthermore, to fulfill the original purpose of the article, the findings of the original study should be summarized in the introduction. It will help the readers follow the chain of logic throughout the article. The following steps have to be taken in order to improve and fine-tune the paper:
- revise the sentence and paragraph structure;
- add a title that delivers a main idea of the original study;
- elaborate more extensively on the impact of climate change.
By following this revision strategy, it is possible to eliminate development and coherence issues, thereby making the article sensible in terms of its intentions. Also, the revision strategy will help to make the writing piece eligible for publication.