Online voting looked simple during the early days of the Internet establishment. However, bots, worms, increasing threats of terrorism, unauthorized intrusion attempts, and viruses decreased the possibility of an easy solution. Today, scientists, election officials, and security analysts have identified various ideas for solving online voting problems. As a result, debates about the exercise’s credibility have emerged worldwide, with some individuals supporting and others opposing it.
Online voting advantages include convenience because it can be done from home, the office, or during vacation. Additionally, voters do not need to walk or drive to the polling station and wait in long queues to cast their ballots. The pros of voting online attract many young people whose numbers have been recorded as minimal over time. The homebound and elderly can easily vote online compared to voting places. The participation of individuals in the local areas might increase due to the flexibility of casting ballots in their comfort. Problems such as ticking more than one aspirant and voter fraud are minimized when people vote through the Internet.
This is because the software can ensure that voters revise what they do without ballots’ invalidation or prevent them from choosing multiple candidates. However, disadvantages such as the inability to vote by economically unstable people and outside interference are a primary concern. People’s social classes differ, and some can lack devices connected to the Internet, eliminating their ability to cast votes online.
In summary, online voting is convenient and should be used to vote for political leaders such as the President because its advantages outweigh the disadvantages. For example, people can vote from their location without going to voting places with long lines. Everybody, including the youth, elderly, and those living with disabilities, has a right to cast their ballots simplified by voting through the Internet. The software used during voting prohibits malpractices such as choosing multiple aspirants, resulting in fair election results.