Objective truths are those which are discovered rather than formed. What is considered as either being a reality or in many cases an unrealistic act is independent of any individual since one is considered to be the sole decision-maker. This is in accordance with the notions of ethical objectivists. On the other hand, the vivid description laid forward by the philosophers clearly portrays the concept on the basis of the reality of the situation. There entail more aspects of ethical objectivism and can include a number of religious opinions and certain forms of ethical egoism
We will write a custom Coursework on Ayer’s Key Argument Against Ethical Objectivism specifically for you
807 certified writers online
A. J. Ayer is an ethical nonobjective who hold that there are no objective moral facts and there are no objectively true moral principles not because they are difficult to discover, or that we might not be sure what they are but because that there are no objective moral truths to discover (Ayer, 1936). His argument is based on emotivism which states that there is nothing objective to argue about because objectivism requires a much more comprehensive vivid scheme. Since we cannot see, hear, smell, taste or touch supposed “moral facts”, for this matter there can be no evidence of the claimed truths and therefore we should not believe in things for which we have no evidence. He argues that when we talk of “stealing” then it is morally unrealistic because it must have proof that it is wrong ethically yet in a real sense it is not right.
From the argument laid down by A. J. Ayer, it is clearly depicted that statements made ethically are not well defined and that they are only enabled in the event that there is a question paused with some moral concepts to tackle the main concept for which they were meant to. Ayer, bring to light that the statement that is morally depicted are entailed to represent emotions that are expressed by individuals an aspect termed emotivism. This is considered as the way a particular feeling or notion is portrayed
The recommendation of action to another person is not an ethical thing to be performed in that this has to totally embrace the views that are laid by the person being imposed upon the actions. What is clearly portrayed by Ayer is that in most cases the attribution of the word is usually meaningless and that the only way of attaining a solution is to foster the treatment of various parties in accordance with the standards that are raised.
A thing cannot be objectively or basically wrong for all people on this view. No matter how disgusting someone’s actions may be, one cannot criticize another as having done something wrong.
One might state that somebody’s actions are not appealing to him, or that the act has offended his preferences, but not claim that other people’s actions are ethically wrong simply because one person’s actions did not satisfy him. A. J. on his part asserts that individuals should not lay the blame on the apparent entailment of evil in the universe owing to arguments often raised to counter the aspect of Christianity. Christianity does not deny the existence of evil, and the problem is not always simple to treaty with. In summary, his arguments against ethical objectivity are undisputable because people cannot just assume that things are wrong because it is just what they think and feel hence based on emotions.
Ayer, A. J. (1936), Language, Truth, and Logic. London: Gollancz Lewis C. S. Mere Christianity, Book III, chap., paragraph. 9, p. 73.