Introduction
The advantages of group collaboration in the classroom are the main subject of this research project. It will specifically examine how group work activities can be organized in the classroom to benefit students and enhance the teaching and learning environment. The Global Banking School, based in London, United Kingdom, will serve as the setting for the study.
The study will also examine the possible negative impacts of classroom group work, including challenges in monitoring and assessing group activities, as well as the increased workload for teachers. The study will also examine any potential adverse effects of group work activities in the classroom, such as the challenges of observing and evaluating group work, as well as the additional workload for teachers. The study findings will be incorporated into instructional plans and suggestions to the Global Banking School on organizing group projects in the classroom more effectively.
Research Methods
Action research is a valuable tool for exploring the potential benefits of collaborative group work. Such research is a cyclical process that involves gathering data, analyzing it, and implementing solutions to enhance existing processes (Moore et al., 2019). This procedure enables both the active participation of participants in the research process and the development of plans based on the data gathered (Chen & Yu, 2019). This is crucial in this study, as it will enable the creation of strategies specifically tailored to the requirements of the Global Banking School and its students.
The mixed methods approach is best suited for examining the potential advantages of this type of teaching and learning activity, as seen in the literature on structuring collaborative group work in the classroom. In interviews and discussions, teachers, students, and stakeholders can be questioned to assemble qualitative and quantitative data (Clinton & Wilson, 2019; Echeverria et al., 2019). Qualitative research can be used to gain a deeper understanding of how various stakeholders in the classroom perceive and experience group work activities (López-Pellisa et al., 2020). Also, it can be used to assess if they will improve or harm the teaching and learning environment.
On the other hand, quantitative information can be utilized to assess the success of group work activities, including gauging student involvement, knowledge acquisition, and general satisfaction. In group work activities, for instance, participatory observation has been utilized to watch how students interact in the classroom (Zubiri-Esnaola et al., 2020). The researcher will be able to determine any potential advantages or disadvantages of group work activities in the classroom during these observations (Wen, 2020; Tissenbaum & Slotta, 2019). This technique’s insightful revelations will influence the research findings into the dynamics of group work in the classroom.
Interviews will also be used as a study method for this research proposal. To better understand the advantages and disadvantages of arranging group work activities in the classroom, interviews will be performed with teachers and students (Albó et al., 2018). These interviews will enable the researcher to gain a deeper understanding of the potential advantages and disadvantages of structured group work in the classroom. (de Hei et al., 2019; Goedhart et al., 2019).
Ultimately, document review will be used as a research method in the research proposal. To better understand how organized group work activities are currently implemented in the classroom, the researcher will analyze relevant papers from the Global Banking School, including regulations and procedures. This will give important information about the school’s teaching and learning methods.
Data Collection and Analysis
According to prior research, arranging collaborative group work in the classroom has various possible advantages. For instance, Supena et al.’s 2021 study indicated that structured group work activities can enhance information retention, teamwork, and communication. Additionally, students engage in more active learning, which may boost motivation levels and improve academic performance. Students can develop their problem-solving skills through structured group work activities tailored to their needs.
Moreover, structured group work activities may help students enhance their leadership, teamwork, and communication abilities, according to research by van Leeuwen & Janssen (2019). This is advantageous for both individual students and the class, as it allows them to hone their skills in a welcoming and cooperative setting (Demirhan & Sahin, 2019). Furthermore, it can help children understand the value of teamwork and how to work effectively in collaboration.
Test scores were higher for students who participated in structured group work activities than for those who did not. According to McGee (2020), students who participated in structured group work activities demonstrated enhanced communication and teamwork skills, as well as higher levels of knowledge retention. Also, compared to when people work alone, focus on assigned tasks is higher (Nguyen et al., 2022).
When students collaborate, they gain a better understanding of the task’s objectives and are less likely to stray from the subject. When students are given the chance to work in groups, they can develop relationships with one another, improve their communication skills, and learn and comprehend various subjects (Prokhorova & Lebedeva, 2020). Additionally, students are more likely to take charge of their education and become accountable for their work.
Activities that involve group collaboration can also help individuals retain knowledge more effectively. For instance, when given the chance to work in groups, students were more likely to retain the material they had learned, according to a study of student learning in the sciences (Azman et al., 2020). Yet, because every learner needs time to express themselves, the practice can be time-consuming and challenging for teachers. Some students might not benefit from the learning intervention, particularly if they don’t participate. In these circumstances, the student may prefer alternative study methods, such as customized learning.
Evaluation of Research Methods
The methods of applied research are suitable and will enable the assessment of various approaches to data analysis. Researchers can get insight into the potential advantages and disadvantages of structuring group work activities in the classroom through participatory observation, which enables them to watch how students interact with each other in a classroom setting (van Leeuwen & Janssen, 2019). Qualitative and quantitative data can be used to assess the impact of structured group work activities on student learning and engagement by conducting interviews and reviewing relevant documents. Reviewing the documents enables researchers to gain a deeper understanding of the Global Banking School’s current teaching and learning methods and any potential modifications that may be made.
Lastly, bothqualitative and quantitative methodologies can be used to assess the data obtained from various study strategies (van Leeuwen & Janssen, 2019). While quantitative techniques can assess the effects of structured group work activities on student learning and engagement, qualitative data analysis can help identify patterns and trends in the data (Wen, 2020). The data analysis can subsequently guide teaching and learning strategies and provide recommendations to the Global Banking School for more effective classroom group work activities.
Data and Conclusions
Studies on organizing collaborative group work in the classroom have identified many advantages for both students and teachers. Collaboration in groups has been linked to improved student engagement and performance. It also fosters a more pleasant learning environment, where students can enhance their morale, teamwork, communication skills, and problem-solving abilities (Supena et al., 2021).
Additionally, it can foster greater levels of creativity and critical thinking. Moreover, research has shown that cooperative group work can boost student morale and motivation. For instance, peer support increases students’ likelihood of participating in the learning process, thereby enhancing their academic success.
Moreover, when students collaborate, they can gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter and develop a more nuanced perspective on their peers’ opinions (Prokhorova & Lebedeva, 2020). Furthermore, teachers can benefit from the increased student interaction and the opportunity for students to take ownership of the learning process. Furthermore, it can help alleviate the strain on teachers and foster a fairer learning environment for all children.
Recommendations
It is advised that the Global Banking School employs techniques to support collaborative group work based on studies on the structure of group collaboration in the classroom. It is crucial to create a welcoming learning environment where students can collaborate to explore the subject matter and refine their problem-solving skills (Moore et al., 2019). To achieve this, educators should clearly define group work expectations, establish rules to ensure everyone understands their roles and responsibilities, and provide sufficient support and guidance throughout the process (Fadillah, 2020).
Additionally, it is crucial to provide students with the tools and guidance they need to succeed in collaborative group projects. This entails providing students with access to tools and strategies to enhance their problem-solving abilities, as well as materials and resources to facilitate a deeper understanding of the subject matter (López-Pellisa et al., 2020). Teachers should also provide feedback on their work to help students understand their strengths and weaknesses, as well as the areas they need to concentrate on to improve their performance.
Reflection
I have gained a better understanding of how to set up collaborative group work in the classroom after completing tasks of this action research project. Through the study process, I identified several benefits of group work exercises in the classroom, including enhanced communication, improved teamwork, and increased memory retention. I have also identified several possible adverse effects of classroom group work, including difficulties in monitoring and assessing group activities, as well as the extra effort required from teachers.
I have investigated the use of mixed approaches for this kind of study, which I believe are the most efficient and appropriate. Examples of these methods include interviews, document reviews, and participatory observation. Using these techniques, I have gained a deeper understanding of the dynamics of group work in the classroom, as well as the potential benefits and drawbacks of scheduled group work activities. My research strategies were sensible and efficient because they enabled me to thoroughly comprehend the topic.
I believe I have successfully identified the numerous benefits and drawbacks of group work activities in the classroom, considering my personal action research practice. Furthermore, I was able to analyze the data obtained through the research methodologies effectively and derive essential findings from the study. My selection of research techniques was appropriate because it enabled me to develop a thorough comprehension of the topic. Additionally, I believe I have successfully implemented a straightforward intervention approach, incorporating several tactics that can enhance the teaching and learning environment at the Global Banking School.
Although I believe my action research project has been effective, I can still improve some aspects. For instance, I may have conducted a more extensive examination of the literature to better comprehend the topic and the potential ramifications of my research. I could have interviewed a broader range of stakeholders to gain insight into the dynamics of classroom group work. Finally, I could have thoroughly examined the data gathered to derive more significant conclusions from the research.
I aim to attend several workshops and seminars to enhance my action research skills as part of my ongoing professional development (CPD). I also intend to read more literature on action research to better understand the various research methods and strategies that can be applied. I also intend to share my study at conferences with an audience with a similar academic background. This will enable me to receive insightful criticism on my study and demonstrate my ability to respond to audience inquiries. I also intend to converse with other action researchers to acquire insight into their research and learn from their experiences.
Reference List
Albó, L., Hernández-Leo, D. and Moreno Oliver, V. (2018) ‘Smartphones or laptops in the collaborative classroom? A study of video-based learning in higher education’, Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(6), pp. 637–649. Web.
Azman, A. et al. (2020) ‘Addressing competency requirements of social work students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia’, Social Work Education, 39(8), pp. 1058–1065. Web.
Chen, W. and Yu, S. (2019) ‘Implementing collaborative writing in teacher-centered classroom contexts: Student beliefs and perceptions’, Language Awareness, 28(4), pp. 247–267. Web.
Clinton, V. and Wilson, N. (2019) ‘More than chalkboards: Classroom spaces and collaborative learning attitudes’, Learning Environments Research, 22(3), pp. 325–344. Web.
de Hei, M. et al. (2019) ‘Developing intercultural competence through collaborative learning in International Higher Education’, Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(2), pp. 190–211. Web.
Demirhan, E. and Şahin, F. (2019) ‘The effects of different kinds of hands-on modeling activities on the academic achievement, problem-solving skills, and scientific creativity of prospective science teachers’, Research in Science Education, 51(S2), pp. 1015–1033. Web.
Echeverria, V., Martinez-Maldonado, R. and Buckingham Shum, S. (2019) ‘Towards collaboration translucence’, Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [Preprint]. Web.
Fadillah, D. (2020) ‘The application of group work in classroom interactions of teaching reading comprehension of students’, Cendikia: Media Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 11(1), pp. 45–55. Web.
Goedhart, N.S. et al. (2019) ‘The flipped classroom: Supporting a diverse group of students in their learning’, Learning Environments Research, 22(2), pp. 297–310. Web.
López-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N. and Rodríguez-Gallego, F. (2020) ‘Collaborative writing at work: Peer Feedback in a blended learning environment’, Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), pp. 1293–1310. Web.
McGee, E.O. (2020) ‘Interrogating structural racism in STEM higher education’, Educational Researcher, 49(9), pp. 633–644. Web.
Moore, B. et al. (2019) ‘Enhancing collaborative group processes to promote academic literacy and content learning for diverse learners through video reflection’, SAGE Open, 9(3), p. 215824401986148. Web.
Nguyen, H.U., Duong, L.N. and Pham, V.P. (2022) ‘Written corrective feedback strategies applied by Van Lang University’s EFL lecturers in teaching online’, AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(2), pp. 21–41. Web.
Prokhorova, M.P. and Lebedeva, T.E. (2020) ‘Advantages and disadvantages of the Method Mutual Assessment in Higher School’, Educational resources and technologies, (3), pp. 37–43. Web.
Supena, I., Darmuki, A. and Hariyadi, A. (2021) ‘The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes’, International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), pp. 873–892. Web.
Tissenbaum, M. and Slotta, J.D. (2019) ‘Developing a smart classroom infrastructure to support real-time student collaboration and inquiry: A 4-year design study’, Instructional Science, 47(4), pp. 423–462. Web.
van Leeuwen, A. and Janssen, J. (2019) ‘A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and Secondary Education’, Educational Research Review, 27, pp. 71–89. Web.
Wen, Y. (2020) ‘Augmented reality enhanced cognitive engagement: Designing classroom-based collaborative learning activities for Young Language Learners’, Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), pp. 843–860. Web.
Zubiri-Esnaola, H. et al. (2020) ‘Inclusivity, participation and collaboration: Learning in interactive groups’, Educational Research, 62(2), pp. 162–180. Web.