Blockchain Technology, Fraud and Accountability Report (Assessment)

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda
Updated: Mar 31st, 2024

Comparative Analysis

Methodology

It is important to note that Boylan and Hull (2022) utilized qualitative research design to gain more in-depth insight into how fraudulent activities manifest in accounting. However, both T&R Staff (2022) and Associated Press (2022) are secondary sources that rely on the utilization of primary data to make their conclusions. Therefore, the methodological comparison is greatly different between these sources, but T&R Staff (2022) and Associated Press (2022) are similar to each other.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Assessment on Blockchain Technology, Fraud and Accountability
808 writers online

Findings

Both T&R Staff (2022) and Associated Press (2022) find that there is a substantial risk behind cryptocurrencies due to the potential of fraudulence and volatility if left unregulated. However, all three sources (Boylan & Hull, 2022; T&R Staff, 2022; Associated Press, 2022) recognize the great opportunity offered by blockchain technology, which is increased accountability.

Recommendations

The study (Boylan & Hull, 2022) suggests using blockchain technology to improve accountability and recommends its use to combat fraudulent activities. However, both T&R Staff (2022) and Associated Press (2022) acknowledge that there are risks associated with the current state of cryptocurrencies, which is why they suggest adopting the technology but not the existing forms of electronic money.

Review

Fraud and BlockChain

Fraudulence is a core problem in accounting and finance overall, which has ethical, economic, and legal implications. Boylan and Hull (2022) assert that prevention of fraud is impossible to prove, and fraudulent activities can be reduced through the use of automatic identification system (AIS) systems. In contrast, T&R Staff (2022) claims that the wild volatility of cryptocurrencies makes them unappealing as a solution to the issue. Similarly, such currencies carry their host of fraudulence, such as pyramid schemes (Associated Press, 2022). In other words, electronic solutions are possible, but the existing ones are problematic.

Accountability Through Block Chain

It should be noted that fraudulence in finance is best combatted through transparency, accountability, and openness. Recent developments in money and payment methods, such as instant payment systems and stable coins, are two examples of innovations that have the potential to have far-reaching implications. It is reported that five technological systems can help in the improvement of the accounting role (Boylan and Hull, 2022). According to Boylan and Hull (2022), the use of blockchain can improve accountability, which leads to a reduction in the rate of fraudulent activities. Similarly, cryptocurrencies can help ordinary citizens fight inflation, but with a surge in demand, new forms of fraudulence take place as a result. However, on the contrary, some experts suggest that “the wild volatility in cryptocurrencies’ value has made it easy for many corporate treasurers to ignore the opportunity hidden behind the substantial risk” (T&R Staff, 2022, para. 2). In other words, one should not dismiss cryptocurrencies entirely, because they bring a higher level of accountability despite their flaws.

Block Chain is the Answer

By reviewing the literature, it is evident that the answer to fraudulence and other major accounting issues is blockchain technology, not cryptocurrencies. The study (Boylan & Hull, 2022) suggests using blockchain technology to improve accountability and recommends its use to combat fraudulent activities. On the contrary, both T&R Staff (2022) and Associated Press (2022) acknowledge that there are risks associated with the current state of cryptocurrencies, which is why they suggest adopting the technology but not the existing forms of electronic money.

References

Associated Press. (2022). .’ Market Watch. Web.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper

Boylan, D. H., & Hull, J. E. (2022). The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 24(3), 45-56. Web.

T&R Staff. (2022). . ALM: Treasury and Risk. Web.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Blockchain Technology, Fraud and Accountability written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2024, March 31). Blockchain Technology, Fraud and Accountability. https://ivypanda.com/essays/blockchain-technology-fraud-and-accountability/

Work Cited

"Blockchain Technology, Fraud and Accountability." IvyPanda, 31 Mar. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/blockchain-technology-fraud-and-accountability/.

References

IvyPanda. (2024) 'Blockchain Technology, Fraud and Accountability'. 31 March.

References

IvyPanda. 2024. "Blockchain Technology, Fraud and Accountability." March 31, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/blockchain-technology-fraud-and-accountability/.

1. IvyPanda. "Blockchain Technology, Fraud and Accountability." March 31, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/blockchain-technology-fraud-and-accountability/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Blockchain Technology, Fraud and Accountability." March 31, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/blockchain-technology-fraud-and-accountability/.

Powered by CiteTotal, referencing maker
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1