This evaluation plan is aimed at assessing the efficiency of the program that is supposed to reduce the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in hospitals. This is one of the risks that can profoundly affect the lives of many patients. Moreover, it is necessary to design tools that can educate the healthcare professionals who will take part in this project. These are the main tasks should be performed since they are necessary for developing an evidence-based practice which can be applied in various medical settings.
Overall, there are several methods that can be adopted. In particular, one can employ such an approach as multivariate analysis which can demonstrate whether this program brought any significant improvements into the current medical practices. The use of this method is important for showing whether the changes in the rate of CAUTI can be attributed to the intervention which was carried out. This is one of the aspects that should be considered. Additionally, one should use such methods as surveys and in-depth interviews which can throw light on the opinions of medical workers as well as patients. The opinions of these stakeholders can highlight the strengths or weaknesses of this program and its implications for the work of healthcare professionals. These are the main methods that should be considered.
There are several dependent and independent variables that should be measured. In particular, the main independent variable will be the early removal of catheter. Overall, this program will be based on the premise that the duration of catheterization is directly correlated with the risk of acquiring CAUTI. In turn, the rate of CAUTI after the implementation of this program will be the main dependent variable that should be measured. In turn, the second independent variable will be the rate of compliance with the new guidelines on the use of catheters and their removal. This aspect is an important part of this evaluation plan. One should keep in mind that even the most effective guidelines may not be beneficial, if they are not followed consistently (Black, 2013). This is one of the pitfalls that should be avoided. Additionally, one should pay close attention to the opinions of people who underwent catheterization. In particular, one should measure their satisfaction with the quality of patient care. Overall, the use of patient surveys is important for understanding the perspective of people who were affected by this intervention. Furthermore, it is necessary to examine the opinions of medical workers who may also express their concerns about the efficiency of this program and offer their recommendations. These are the main variables that should be examined.
Moreover, it is critical to develop tools that should assist people who will be responsible for the implementation of this project. This step is important for the proper implementation of a healthcare program since sometimes nurses may not know about the most recent findings of researchers (Black, 2013, p. 82). Therefore, at first, one can create a Power Point presentation which can briefly describe the necessity for intervention and the way in which can be implemented. The major participants should know why this intervention is necessary. Furthermore, they need to understand how it can be carried out. Therefore, the education of participants is critical for increasing the rate of compliance with the new guidelines. The main participants should be motivated to take an active part in this program. Secondly, it is important to design booklets which can assist raise nurses’ awareness about the peculiarities of CAUTI. Additionally, one should also explain the role of that printed reminders will play. So, these medical workers will see how they can better assist patients. This is one of the details that can be singled out.
There will be several assessment tools that can be used to evaluate the outcomes of this program. First, one should develop a statistical survey that will measure patients’ satisfaction with the quality of healthcare services that they received during their stay in hospital (Gray, 2009). This survey will include multiple-choice questions that will prompt people to rate the quality of care. In this way, one can determine whether the removal of catheter can improve the experiences of patients. Overall, this step is critical for exploring the views of people who seek medical assistance. Additionally, it is important to use an in-depth interview that will contain several open-ended questions about this program. These questions will be addressed to medical workers who implemented this project. These professionals should express the views about the possible challenges that could emerge during the implementation of this plan. It is critical to apply a statistical test that can indicate whether the program did lead to positive outcomes. These are the main tools that should be applied.
Overall, this evaluation plan is important for developing an evidence-based intervention. It can highlight the strengths or weaknesses of the plan. Furthermore, these steps are useful for understanding the experiences of the main stakeholders who will be affected by this project. These are the main arguments that can be put forward.
Reference List
Black, B. (2013). Professional Nursing: Concepts & Challenges. New York, NY: Elsevier Health Sciences.
Gray, J. (2009). Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health: How to Make Decisions about Health Services and Public Health. New York, NY: Elsevier Health Sciences.