Introduction
Devising and implementing a practical and beneficial health care system is an essential task for the government. Given the theoretical and practical advances in the field of medicine and structural organization, a variety of choices is available for a country’s authorities, allowing them to choose the most suitable option. One such option is centralized healthcare utilized in a vast majority of states, which possesses unique characteristics and benefits. Given the significance of establishing a national health care system, it is demanding to ascertain the general advantages of a centralized approach to medicine provision.
Main body
Centralized health care is highly acclaimed due to some unprecedented gains that cannot be offered by a non-centralized system. The first of such highlighted profits is the reduction of the overall cost of care for all the nation’s citizens, which potentially decreases the losses for both individuals and corporations. With the introduction of a generalized strategy that allows various parties to obtain medical services without additional charges, health care spending tends to drop significantly (Seldon, 2018). This is true not only for private health care users but for businesses as well, and the latter are not compelled to provide their employees with costly medical insurance. Furthermore, as the clinical charges begin to decrease, the citizens might divert their funds to other needs and desires, tremendously elevating their quality of life and financial stability.
Another crucial benefit of a consolidated health care approach is the possibility to offer the population a considerable level of clientele inclusion. In a centralized system, all of the nation’s citizens are eligible to receive professional medical support from clinical institutions regardless of their financial status and level of income (Khaki et al., 2020). As the government ensures that every person is protected from health-related complications, people are capable of upholding the desirable level of well-being without concentrating on health care coverage. This advantage is highly beneficial for disadvantaged individuals in need of sufficient clinical support, who cannot purchase the necessary services, for instance, poverty-stricken families, disabled persons, or military personnel (Gaille, 2018). Given that medical coverage encompasses all categories of citizens and essential medical treatment, the quality of life often enhances remarkably, especially for the populations requiring additional protection.
Finally, the third valuable attribute of the health care system discussed is the potential to reduce individual and corporate bankruptcies. A tremendous amount of financial debts are related to medical bankruptcies and fees instilled by clinical services. Quality health care is a drastically expensive service for a private buyer, and the charges further increase based on the severity of the condition treated (Khaki et al., 2020). In a scenario where an individual requires constant medical support and protection, a centralized system greatly alleviates the financial burden, positively impacting their future. In comparison, a non-consolidated health care approach might lead to monetary debts that a person is unable to fulfill due to their economic status and their clinical condition.
Conclusion
To conclude, it is evident that a centralized health care system offers the nation’s citizens several incredible benefits, namely the reduction of clinical charges, the inclusion of diverse populations, and medical bankruptcy protection. Presenting individuals with an option to secure healthcare support that does not require supplementary funds and economic prosperity greatly enhances the well-being of both ordinary citizens and disadvantaged populations. The consolidation especially profits those in need of complicated medical procedures given their medical condition.
References
Gaille, L. (2018). 20 pros and cons of centralized health care. Vittana. Web.
Khaki, A. R., Xu, Y., Cheung, W. Y., Li, L., Fedorenko, C., Grivas, P., Ramsey, S., & Shankaran, V. (2020). Comparison of health care utilization at the end of life among patients with cancer in Alberta, Canada, versus Washington state. JCO Oncology Practice, 16(12), 1543–1552. Web.
Seldon, A. (2018). The lessons of centralized medicine. In C. A. Lindsay (Ed.), New directions in public health care (pp. 51–74). Routledge.