Cindy Marshall: Leadership Frames Case Study

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Each approach of Cindy Marshall has the right to life, but at best, it should not lead to an escalation of the conflict, but at the same time, maintain a balance of subordination and corporate ethics. Political and structural frames are simply an indication of the fact of a new leader, while Bill’s role is now to help and accompany (Bolman & Deal, 2017, p. 317, p. 319). The approach through the HR frame is much more diplomatic, while the symbolic one somehow leads to an absentee conflict, which, nevertheless, can be resolved by agreement. In this situation, the most losing option for Cindy is threats, solving a problem with high-ranking authorities, or a confrontation in front of employees. While each approach has its drawbacks or blind spots, it is in Cindy’s interest to maximize the benefits of an integrated approach (Bolman & Deal, 2017, p. 323). In the case of the symbolic frame, a good tactic is to compare the situation with the client’s expectation, but in this way, Marshall deliberately enters into a conflict, which proposes to solve it right there, which is very diplomatic.

The political frameworks are more with subordination and trying to solve the problem with the vice president. The disadvantage of the approach is that the delegation of responsibility for the conflict on the first day of work does not speak in favor of either Cindy or Bill but instead sends a signal to management that junior leaders cannot solve their problems themselves. On the other hand, Marshall must show that she now has the last word and maintain dignity, which this frame facilitates. The dialogue in terms of HR is the most diplomatic and advantageous for Cindy, as she immediately expresses confidence in subordinate employees, does not escalate the conflict, and leaves the premises. The Structural Frame keeps Cindy in line with her goals, which breaks the diplomatic a bit but also leads to conflict. Therefore, the most optimal dialogue option should be to choose the HR frame, insisting as delicately as possible on fruitful cooperation after listening to the opinion of subordinate employees, and only then making tough decisions, including in dialogues with Bill. In the end, the employees determine the quality of the company’s service, which must be improved regardless of the leaders’ debate.

Reference

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2024, May 7). Cindy Marshall: Leadership Frames. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cindy-marshall-leadership-frames/

Work Cited

"Cindy Marshall: Leadership Frames." IvyPanda, 7 May 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/cindy-marshall-leadership-frames/.

References

IvyPanda. (2024) 'Cindy Marshall: Leadership Frames'. 7 May.

References

IvyPanda. 2024. "Cindy Marshall: Leadership Frames." May 7, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cindy-marshall-leadership-frames/.

1. IvyPanda. "Cindy Marshall: Leadership Frames." May 7, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cindy-marshall-leadership-frames/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Cindy Marshall: Leadership Frames." May 7, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cindy-marshall-leadership-frames/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1